|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 8th, 2011, 07:04 AM | #46 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 101
|
Re: 3D's success, your current opinions please.
As the "Cloud" concept becomes more sophisticated and capable, the actual movie theaters could use software that could download the appropriate version.
And to even go further with the idea, the software could incorporate the screen distance and dimensions of the theater itself, to make a customized version of the movie for projection. Come to think of it, and to be easier, theaters could send their information to the distributer, and have a movie with the 3D specs, "custom made", then downloaded from the "cloud". Last edited by Carlton Bright; October 8th, 2011 at 07:14 AM. Reason: adding thoughts |
October 8th, 2011, 07:11 AM | #47 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: hungary
Posts: 462
|
Re: 3D's success, your current opinions please.
"And we look at it the same way we do with 3D cinema: Using a left view and a right view, one for each eye."
Hmm, not exactly. I real life we are focusing to different depth, but in cinema always to the screen plane. This is a huge difference, and often result in headache.. Another thing and conflict in brain is that in real life we feel the movement also with our body, but in cinema you sit in the chair and don't move. That result sickness sometimes. And 3D just need more fps than 24. Especially on a big screen like Imax. Is this enough reason for 3D cinema is NOT like 3D viewing in real life?.. |
| ||||||
|
|