|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 16th, 2011, 07:40 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 101
|
Wim Wenders' Pina's 3D Finish
Here is an interesting Article on the Production of this 3D Film:
Wim Wenders' Pina's 3D Finish | Studio Daily |
July 16th, 2011, 05:23 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 147
|
Re: Wim Wenders' Pina's 3D Finish
It's a beautiful film I really enjoyed it, looking to see it again when it next comes close by
|
July 17th, 2011, 09:17 AM | #3 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Re: Wim Wenders' Pina's 3D Finish
I saw most of it at the Toronto Int'l Stereoscopic Conference last month and Wim talked about it for a couple of hours. He said that he had been trying to think of the proper way to photograph Pina's choreography since the early 90's but it wasn't until he saw U23D at Cannes that it occurred to him 3D might be the solution he was looking for.
The chosen camera positions and steadicam work were great, the editing was excellent and it was definitely the best 3D dance film I've ever seen. However, my only criticism is that they used very wide interaxials and had a pronounced dwarfism effect throughout. At least it was consistent.
__________________
Tim Dashwood |
July 17th, 2011, 07:21 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Malibu, CA
Posts: 480
|
Re: Wim Wenders' Pina's 3D Finish
Since the film's DP has stated that he used Methode Derode throughout the filming, what percentage of BG divergence would you guess he set the rig at?
I haven't been lucky enough to see the film yet, but I would guess he got out into the 3% - 4% range judging from your description. Just trying to work the thing backwards into logic. . |
July 18th, 2011, 08:55 PM | #5 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Re: Wim Wenders' Pina's 3D Finish
I would positive parallax was typically 2% and often more in the scenes Wim showed us. I was sitting way back in the theatre and it was only a 30 foot screen so my angle of divergence per eye was low but I still felt it. They didn't utilize negative parallax very much at all, but when they did they would tend to brake the stereo window quite often.
__________________
Tim Dashwood |
| ||||||
|
|