|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 1st, 2009, 09:49 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Venice-Italy
Posts: 52
|
2 questions on Stereo 3D toolbox
...ah, finally a s3d product which gives more importance to the geometric
corrections then to the color corrections. (OK Ocula I admire too) I'm only sorry to see (if I'm correct) that on the side-by-side mode the picture gets horizontally 50% squeezed. I have no idea how to project this in a 2 projector polarized filter system. If the side-by-side pictures would not be squeezed then I could project it directly to two separate projectors even with the Macintosh. Second questions, do you offer only vertical interlace or is there an option for horizontal interlacing too? I refer to the Hyundai monitors. Congratulations for your product and other questions I will put only after I bought the product:) Istvan Toth PS: I tried to download the Demo, unfortunatley after the file FxFactory.dmg is there it gives me Activation Failed before I do anything.
__________________
Istvan Toth RED #1161 |
September 1st, 2009, 10:39 AM | #2 | |||||
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Have you upgraded to Snow Leopard yet?
__________________
Tim Dashwood |
|||||
September 1st, 2009, 02:53 PM | #3 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
One more note on the unsqueezed mode for side by side.
You will have to make a sequence and slug that is twice the width of your source images to maintain full resolution. So 1920x1080 will end up being 3840x1080. Apply slug and then apply the Stereo3D Toolbox to it. Use the image well option to input your left and right eyes into the slug.
__________________
Tim Dashwood |
September 2nd, 2009, 07:02 AM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Venice-Italy
Posts: 52
|
Hi Tim
only since 2 months you are working on this? Wouw! Anyway I made it to download the Demo and indeed I see that this one is done by somebody who has some s3D blood in his arteries:) In 2-3 days I will write more about the experience I made with it. One thing I see already now, I would very much love to have reference-lines to set correctley the vertical parallax. Or what about the solution which is used in StereoMovieMaker? They copied a technic used in the astronomie where 2 images get continously substracted by each other and from the differences you can see visually down to pixelprecision where missalignments are present. I agree many programs start to use the 2:1 squeezed format as default, but I don't like it. I prefer to preserve during the editing process as much of pixels I can. I think in 2-3 years we will have better s3D monitors and I would hate to see my footage cut down to 50% of the visual information. Also on the Macintosh a 1:1 side/side quicktime clip can be projected without problems with a 2 projector system, whereas a 2:1 format would need some conversions. BTW when I use non gen-locked consumer cameras then I prefer to sync the L/R clips by using the sound track. Every consumer camera records the sound so I see it as the easiest way to do it in FCP. There is also another nice advantage, I can quickly jump to different parts of the clip and controll if later on there where some framedrops and maybe fix them. So what I do now is clapping my hands as in he beginning as at the end of each scene. Ocula has a nice feature and one day I may buy it only for that: you can change in post the interocular distance. Obviously not more then 10-15 degree but it is enough to reduce a horrible Liliput effect.(Something I hate in most of the current s3D movies.) Again, thank you for having developed this wonderful product Istvan
__________________
Istvan Toth RED #1161 |
September 2nd, 2009, 01:30 PM | #5 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Those are both great suggestions and they will find their way into v1.1 (actually I already had difference mode in an earlier version.)
The only problem with unsqueezed side by side and the filter structure of Final Cut Pro is that the filter can only occupy the same dimensions as the source clip and not the sequence. This is why you need to use a piece of slug that is double wide to accommodate unsqueezed side by side. The side by side format is going to be around for a while. It is what Nippon and Hyundai IT have been using for broadcast in Japan and JVC's new 3DTV also uses this format. However I think the best archival mode (if you aren't using unsqueezed) is over under with the split field option. By splitting the fields before squeezing into over/under I was able to maintain full resolution of converged objects or text when unsqueezed to interlace mode or displayed on an interlaced XPol screen. I've seen that virtual interaxial feature in Ocula demonstrated and it is pretty cool. It isn't always perfect (because it is basically morphing a new POV between the existing left and right eye views) but is good enough for fixing hyper-stereo in most situations. I doubt a feature like this will ever make it into Stereo3D Toolbox. Morphing is beyond the scope of my programming expertise.
__________________
Tim Dashwood |
September 3rd, 2009, 11:51 AM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Venice-Italy
Posts: 52
|
Now I have to make a stupid question concerning FCP, but how to you create an empty "slug"?
__________________
Istvan Toth RED #1161 |
September 3rd, 2009, 01:35 PM | #7 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Make your sequence first at whatever final resolution you want. Then from the generator menu select slug and then overwrite/insert into your sequence. Slug will take the same resolution as the sequence.
Apply Stereo3D Toolbox to the slug and then use both image wells for your left and right sources. This method will allow you to do unsqueezed modes (assuming your graphics card can handle the much wider resolution.) Generators in FCP are limited to 2 minutes in length so the only workaround if you need something longer is to create your own (with lots of slug in a sequence and then export as a quicktime, then re-import)
__________________
Tim Dashwood |
September 4th, 2009, 10:10 AM | #8 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Venice-Italy
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
I still struggle with the master comands, there is something I probably miss, but will come back to you later with it. I have a 1680X1050 xpol Hyundai 22" monitor... Those monitors don't recognise the side-by-side format but only the horizontal interlace metod. Thanks istvan
__________________
Istvan Toth RED #1161 |
|
December 3rd, 2009, 10:35 PM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 101
|
Hello,
This thread has been very informative, Thank You, Carlton |
| ||||||
|
|