![]() |
Rendering Filters
I've noticed that some filters don't render as they look in the preview, they render less extreme. For instance Vitascene's defocus filter renders much less blurred than it looks on the preview. Also when I render film effects the grain, hairs, spots etc look much less extreme.
Anybody know why this might be? |
Is your preview window set to Best/Full?
|
Quote:
Grazie |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The resolution of the Preview window on preview/auto is half of what it is for best/full. Look at the numbers in the bottom left corner of the preview window and you'll see what I mean. I get the same "lower quality" effect if I'm previewing text. At preview/auto, it looks soft and fuzzy. At best/full, it's crisp and clear. If you can't do a proper preview at the setting, do a RAM render of a short piece. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
~jr |
Quote:
|
Preview is a trade-off of quality for frame rate. Some filters are light on the CPU and the preview doesn't have to sacrifice much quality to keep the frame rate up. Other filters are heavy on the CPU and so more quality is sacrificed in order to keep the frame rate acceptable. This will cause different filters to preview differently. Film Looks usually uses very CPU intensive processing so you may see more of a difference between Preview and Good or Best.
~jr |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:07 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network