Vito DeFilippo |
October 27th, 2008 05:54 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Shealy
(Post 956148)
Vito,
Interesting. I always thought I'd have two cameras for the ceremony, one in the balcony with a wide, safe shot to use as fill and a manned camera bouncing around for the best shots.
|
I have no assistant, and the way weddings are scheduled here, I'm usually racing from the bride's after taking a shot of her getting into the limo, hoping to get there ahead of her. I have to run in to the church, set a mic on the groom and podium, set up my tripod, change tapes, run back out to get a shot of her arriving or waiting by the door, and run back in for the start. There's no way in a million years I'd have time to get up in the balcony and set up a second camera. I'd love to have it there, but that's life. If you have time, definitely go for it. The added insurance is great.
Quote:
Do you typically provide a continuous version of the ceremony or an edited "highlights" of the ceremony?
|
In between. I present a continuous edit that feels like a full ceremony, but is shortened. Knowing what I will shorten lets me use those times in the ceremony to shoot many cutaways that I will use in the edit to cover the camera movements you mention.
Most of the time, I can find time during long homilies, prayers, and communion.
|