Piotr Wozniacki |
August 13th, 2008 01:15 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Kellett
(Post 919601)
Conclusion
V1.1 is about twice as fast as V2 when clips don't span cards, about 2.5 times faster when clips do span cards.
|
Thanks John, Paul, and Tom; I have now both versions installed under Vista x64 so my comparisons are more precise. The speed difference increases faster than in proportion to the clip size; with 16GB it's almost 10x (re-wrapping only - I'm not counting the copying and merging process).
Judging from the low CPU usage (in both case some 15% on my quad), there is really not too much processing involved other than disk I/O operations; it beats me why such a big difference...
|