Thomas Smet |
June 11th, 2007 10:19 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd Giglio
(Post 694875)
Hello,
I'm in pre-production for a feature film and I intend on using the Redrock Micro M2 with the camera I choose (I already have the V1U). My question... do you think it would be better to use the V1U with HDMI output to the AJA IO HD for an 'uncompressed' ProRes 422 image, or use the upcoming Sony XDCAM EX. I know that using the AJA IO HD would require tethering the camera to a laptop, hard drive, etc. for a live feed, but I wonder what the differences in video quality would be. Also, would there be any advantages to using the ProRess 422 over the XDCAM workflow (I do not plan on using/sharing between the windows platform at all).
I also know that the Sony XDCAM EX isn't out yet (same for the AJA IO HD), so there is no comparisons between the quality (I'm pretty sure that the XDCAM EX codec is the same as it's big brother's). So basically, has anyone compared the uncompressed V1's image direct from the HDMI to the image delivered by an XDCAM?
There's a lot of speculation since neither the XDCAM EX or AJA IO HD is out yet, but I just figured I'd ask a few questions anyway.
Thank you to anyone who would like to comment.
Todd
|
What kind of movie is this going to be? mpeg2 codecs depend on how complex the scenes are. If this is a slow paced drama then XDCAMHD will be more then enough for perfect quality. Even HDV itself only really starts to fall apart with very fast and complex scenes. XDCAMHD has that extra chunk of bits to help out even some of the most demanding situations. 24 movies tend to compress a lot better then live shot material because usually the camera is on a tripod or a steadycam of some sort. Many times the camera itself may not move at all which makes the compression very easy. Even an action movie may be ok with XDCAMHD although sometimes you may notice a few blocks during explosions or photograph flashes or strobe lights ect...
If the project is a drama or comedy or something that isn't super complex and fast paced the live capture to lightly compressed or uncompressed may be a little overkill.
What I may suggest doing for your test shots in October is maybe rent one of the current XDCAMHD cameras to see how well the codec works out for your material. If it holds up very well and will be more then enough for you to work with then you can think about getting the XDCAM EX when it comes out. During this time you can even bring along your V1 to see how it compares to XDCAMHD. At that point you may even be able to rent the EX itself to compare to the V1. Nobody will be able to tell you better about how well each camera will work for your project then you yourself could.
|