![]() |
Sony offers the cleanest image, esp. with gain.
heath |
Quote:
Edit - NEver mind - found the info. |
Quote:
|
1 CCD falls apart, too, but 3 CDDs are great. So I'm guessing 3 CMOS will be great for low light, too.
heath |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
We could expect an AVCHD cam coming soon with a 3CMOS and 1920x1080... and possibly true progressive and 1080p60
(sorry if this is a wishlist.) |
Wow, seems to me Sony missed the mark on this one. Who's gonna buy it? The feature set is not attractive to the semi-pros; it's too expensive for the casual enthusiast. 1/4" CCDs. Non-native 16:9 chips? Why would they do that on a 16:9 format like HDV? MSRP $3500 (but it has to street for under $2800 or else people will just buy the FX1).
Let's see some innovation. I want a low-cost tapeless HD format. 4GB SD cards are cheap these days. Affordable 8, 16, 32GB cards can't be far away. Panasonic scored big on the HVX, and I think they'll do it again with AVC-Intra. Link to more info: http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content...CMOS-Chips.htm |
AVC, to Sony, is consumer-only.
HDV is tape-based only (with some exceptions, like FireStore and Sony's new digital capture device). heath |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:55 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network