|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 14th, 2025, 06:36 PM | #16 |
Equal Opportunity Offender
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,080
|
Re: Moving to XDCAM HD
Guessing we could think of it as a more glorious form of HDV? ;-)
Andrew |
January 14th, 2025, 10:21 PM | #17 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,578
|
Re: Moving to XDCAM HD
Doug.
“So we shall let the reader answer this question for himself: who is the happier man, he who has braved the storm of life and lived or he who has stayed securely on shore and merely existed?” ― Hunter S. Thompson Chris Young |
January 15th, 2025, 06:54 AM | #18 |
Vortex Media
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,457
|
Re: Moving to XDCAM HD
Chris, I'm not sure what that means in the this case, but it sounds very pretty. :-)
Anyway, I decided to ask a higher authority, so I put the following question to ChatGPT, and this is the (unedited) answer I got: Question: "Is 1440x1080 considered Full HD video?" Answer: "No, 1440x1080 is not considered Full HD. Full HD (FHD) resolution is defined as 1920x1080 pixels, with an aspect ratio of 16:9. 1440x1080 has a 4:3 aspect ratio, which is narrower than Full HD. This resolution is often associated with older cameras or certain recording formats, like DVCPRO HD or HDV, that supported non-square pixels (anamorphic) to achieve widescreen output. If displayed with square pixels, it will appear as a standard 4:3 frame. If stretched anamorphically, it can be adapted to a widescreen 16:9 format but is still not technically Full HD." There you go. That's the final word because you can't argue with AI because it is never wrong. :-)
__________________
Vortex Media http://www.vortexmedia.com/ Sony FS7, F55, and XDCAM training videos, field guides, and other production tools |
| ||||||
|
|