If you look at the specs one would say the 320 must be much better in low-light than the EX3.

How so John, when they have the same chips?
Steve

Maybe John is referring to the PDF brochure that had a mistake (maybe on purpose for NAB buzz) that said the camera was rated at f12 at 2000 lux. But another part of the same document said f10 at 2000 lux.

I was surprised to hear reports that the much more expensive list price PMW-320 would be pretty much the same camera as the EX-1/3. Seems like quite a premium to pay just for a form factor change.

Maybe the street price will be a lot closer to the EX-3.

You're not confusing the 320 with the 350 are you? They both have very similar bodies, but the 320 has 1/2" chips, the 350 2/3" chips.

Even if the fundamental chips are the same between the EX3/320, there are many differences between them besides form factor - ability to take integral radio mics on the 320 being just one.