![]() |
Re: Gh5 firmware 2,0
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The prime advantage of an All-Intra encoding is that your editing will be snappier because there is less CPU load. I would suspect that in most cases it will only give a marginally higher quality. |
Re: Gh5 firmware 2,0
Quote:
|
Re: Gh5 firmware 2,0
Quote:
|
Re: Gh5 firmware 2,0
Thanx Gary. I was wondering what would happen if I tried to view an GLG file on my Sony TV that is not listed for HLG, but it is an HDR TV. Would it play correctly? Would it look correct? I do not have a GH5 yet so I can't try it out.
I have been doing quite a bit of research the last few days on this subject and I am trying to understand 4k HDR and HLG and learn a workflow from shooting thru post to deliver. |
Re: Gh5 firmware 2,0
I tried playing 4K HEVC for HLG (the new low-bitrate version included in the update) clips on my 2016 LG OLED HDR TV via the USB stick option and the TV could not play them back. These were clips straight from the GH5. Kinda disappointing. Note that HEVC clips captured on an iPhone in iOS 11 play back fine on the same TV.
So score it Apple: 1 Panasonic: 0 |
Re: Gh5 firmware 2,0
Quote:
In my testing so far, version 2's 10bit ALL-I is free of these problems (as one would expect). |
Re: Gh5 firmware 2,0
Quote:
|
Re: Gh5 firmware 2,0
You do realize that all the EVA1 short films that are out where shot in full Vlog in the same LongGOP codec, right?
|
Re: Gh5 firmware 2,0
Quote:
|
Re: Gh5 firmware 2,0
Quote:
At work right now, will upload samples when I get home tonight. |
Re: Gh5 firmware 2,0
Quote:
Quote:
Right now I'm working with Clog2 footage that is breaking down, which is 400Mbps Intra, so it happens, it's not the panacea. |
Re: Gh5 firmware 2,0
As promised, a couple of links to 10bit DCI 4K test clips shot back in early April. These are straight from the GH5 (be sure to download them to see, the Google Drive video is highly compressed). Note the blocky artifacts that can be seen particularly on the white stucco wall to the right. I'd seen similar blocky artifacts on an earlier indoor test, but that was in low light so I assumed low light was the problem.
After these tests in broad daylight I concluded that there was some kind of issue with the codec on either the Panasonic or Apple (FCPX is my NLE) side. All my 8bit tests were clean, so I've shot nothing but 8bit since. I believe both of these were shot using the Cinelike D profile: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B9...TMzX21SRVdtbGc https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9B...ew?usp=sharing Also note: I have not had time to test 10bit 150mbps with firmware version 2. I have no intention of using it, in fact, as my 10bit 400mpbs ALL-I testing has gone well. So the above links are essentially academic, but when others complain of issues with the original 10bit 150mbps, these tests are what make me believe them. |
Re: Gh5 firmware 2,0
Thank you for the clips. That isn't codec breakdown, that looks way more like corruption of the information being written to the card. I would be surprised if these are the same cards that you're using to record the 400Mbps Intra footage too. Would that be incorrect?
What kind of cards were you using to record these clips? |
Re: Gh5 firmware 2,0
Quote:
First of all it is not correct V-Log L footage as the code value ranges are completely off, second the video range is limited instead of full as it should be with V-Log L. Also the video is not 24p but 23.97p. On further inspection on the metadata using exif tools all the Panasonic specific items are not available and there is a lot of Apple specific data instead. Are you sure this is straight out of camera? I am pretty sure it is absolutely not! |
Re: Gh5 firmware 2,0
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:09 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network