![]() |
HD1 640*480 60fps
and the recorded video same the DV quality ?
|
dv is 720*480 (ntsc), 720*576 (pal), compress rate 1/5.
|
ok the size smaller , but my question is the "real look" quality
|
Some samples
Here are some samples I did with my HD1:
Moscow, 07.30.2006, Gorky park, cloudy: Attraction 1 - 12Mb, 16:09 Attraction 2 - 13Mb, 17:37 Attraction 3 - 5Mb, 17:40 Locomotive - 12Mb, 19:00 Ship - 11Mb, 19:07 Trampoline - 14Mb, 19:17 |
Frame Grab Sample
Hi,
A framegrab from a short film of a tropical butterfly taken at the "Plantasia" in Swansea S.Wales. http://www.sendspace.com/file/0cln9i A couple of things to note here :- 1. HD video is now of sufficient resolution to pull a decent still picture from. Thereby allowing you to video a scene and then pick the best stills a la multi shot / bracket shooting facilities on still cameras . Very useful if the subject is moving around(!) 2. There has been some of negative press about the form factor of this camera. However for someone with weak fingers/hands/arms - eg from Arthritis, the weight combined with the angled pistol grip holding position is ideal. Rgds. |
I have downloaded Dimitri's Gorky Park samples but they don't play very well on my PC. I'm sure they would, if I had the right viewer, or codec, installed. Does anybody have any suggestions, please?
|
Quote:
|
Ah, thanks very much. :) That is so much better. These are all handheld shots, Dimitri? No tripods?
EDIT: That Sendspace makes a refreshing change after some of the awful storage/download sites I have had to download from recently. :) |
Settings
Quote:
Image stabiliser: OFF White balance: cloudy Sensitivity: ISO50 OR ISO100 Focus: manual Exposure mode: Aperture priority - 3.5 |
Focus - manual? Wow, you must have fast fingers. I see you have image stabiliser "off". How does it affaect the quality of the picture if you have it turned "on"?
|
Quote:
|
I see, thanks. I just can't make my mind up about this camcorder. :o
|
Quote:
|
While I do see increased resolution- the quality of samples I've seen posted seem "lacking" in some way. I just don't see the absolute resolution so to speak- details seem lost, and the colors seem "boosted" too much. The video almost looks like upscaled DV. I do think the HD1 is a step in the right direction and it has "its" place in videography but I think it's going to be awhile before it's near current HDV quality.
For it's pricepoint it isn't a bad camera especially when "web" video is your target- but I think just about anyone who has used a HDV camcorder would find it's lack of fine detail and general video quality lacking. I'd like to get one sometime but more of a "webcamera" for web posts and webvids not for DVD distribution- but I'm hoping this trend continues. (Just my opinion) |
Quote:
I see you mentioned that you used ISO 50 on some of your shots. I see in the specifications page for the HD1 it specifies a minimum ISO-200 in the video mode and an ISO-50 in still mode only. I haven't received my HD1 yet so I can't confirm this. Just curious is there a 50 ISO setting in video mode? Paul |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:35 PM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network