![]() |
Solutions for dealing with noise and grain in low-light shots?
I've returned from a trip with a lot of night shots. They looked fine on the built-in LCD but, as I edit them, it's obvious that there is a lot of noise and grain, no doubt from the camera's gain getting kicked up.
Two questions: 1. How do I avoid this in the future? I shot at 1080i/60 and would prefer to avoid the issues of shooting at 24p, though I would if there is no choice. Does the camera's "cine" gamma setting defeat the gain? It's not practical for me to try to lock the aperture off for each shot. 2. Any good post solutions? I've seen some filters ranging from free for a Virtual Dub plug-in to a couple of hundred dollars for a Premiere Pro plug-in. I'll spend the money if I have to, but not on something that offers only marginal benefits. |
1) Add light. Cost: < $500
2) Get a more sensitive camera. Cost: $5000+ 3) Clean it with Neat Video. Cost: < $100 |
I invariably do some exterior night shots of the wedding venues I film, and shooting at a very slow shutter speed on the Z1 (on a solid surface of course) means I can have no gain-up at all. Remember that correcting exposures in post never looks as good as getting it right up front.
Of course if you need to film natural movement you'll simply have to add more light - there's no two ways about it. You can't 'defeat the gain' if you amplify the signal electronically, though I'm pretty pleased with the way the Z1 trades grain for sharpness in 1080i, it a fair swap in my view. I'm slighty horrified to learn you don't lock down the exposure for each shot Paul. It really is the number one requirement in any movie scene. tom. |
I use the UK version of the camera, so there may be some difference in behaviour, and obviously the PF25 mode doesn't have the pulldown problems that the 24p mode has, but overall -
When you use the PF25 mode in combination with Cine mode, the camera will try and keep the shutter at 1/50, but if it needs to increase exposure, it'll drop the shutter to 1/25 before it bumps up the gain. Overall, as long as you don't swing the camera around too much, this gives a fairly nice motion signature. Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Paul, et al
I just tried the Neat product on some EX footage 1080p24. It was incredible, I was awe struck by the easy, simplicity, and outstanding results. Jim |
Quote:
|
Follow-up
I tried the Neat filter last night. Though not a perfect solution, it did a reasonable job of bringing the grain and noise down to something I'm willing to live with. One note, however: it adds, dramatically, to render times in Premiere Pro CS3.
|
perhaps im a bit late on this.
I haven't tried neat, but exporting adobe media encoder you can turn on noise reduction. Then use the clip again in the timeline. It gives the footage a very nice look too. |
Paul have you tried the trick with mini-SD card and covering up the lens while setting the exposure?
|
Quote:
Quote:
BTW, do I assume correctly that, even if I select aperture priority and manually set aperture, the camera will still kick up the gain? |
I would try the Cine mode as well. In most low light situations, I can't stand the gain, but Cine mode severely limits (or stops completely) the gain applied to the image.
|
Quote:
|
See my post above. It isn't that Cine mode disables the gain, it's that it drops the shutter speed down to 1/24 before it applies gain. The gamma is just one aspect of the Cine mode.
|
I am just learning, but I think you can just cover the lens (black) and set the exposure to get rid of the gain. Check with the mini-SD card to be sure if the gain is off or on?
http://www.dvxuser.com/jason/hv20/ |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:29 PM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network