![]() |
Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Check out this great 3 minute video showing off the power of the Dual Pixel AF systems, especially when combined with the Face Detection capabilities of the C100mkII. Canon's AF is so good, i've never seen anything like it in a professional camcorder. It really is like having a focus puller assistant living inside your camera. The video also highlights the cameras slow motion features, and What do you think?
Eric Petrie provideoandtape.com Finance the Canon C100 for $129 a month Finance the Sony FS7 for $248 a month |
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
This is why 4K doesn't attract me as much when it currently means giving this up. Dual Pixel AF has allowed me to get shots easily that would have taken many takes without a focus puller, and shots I wouldn't have been able to get period.
|
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
I don't think people realize how powerful the DAF tool can be, until they really give it a try.
|
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
its why we own two 70Ds, that face tracking auto focus, I'd love to have 2 or 3 of these.
|
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Quote:
Just imagine being able to use L glass while center focusing and being able to reframe as needed in post. Yes, with an STM lens you don't need to reframe due to the face detection, but STM glass isn't fast and doesn't produce the best image. For example, when I'm filming a bride coming down the aisle I often want this at f2 or f2.8 with a longer lens like the 70-200 2.8L IS II or 135L. Face detection won't work with L glass so I'll be forced to either pull focus manually or always frame the bride right smack in the middle. This prevents my ability to use the rule of 3rds and also limits my creative power. |
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Quote:
It's helpful, yes, but to rely on it is a bad choice in my opinion. |
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Gary, you seem to be on a crusade against 4K :) In an other thread saying how impossible it is to deal with in post and now that using 4K to reframe in post is no good either, just because the c100 doesn't have 4K doesn't mean it has no advantages. There are still many that wanted 4K on the c100 eventhough it does do great 1080p. I would prefer to have one 4K camera in my gearbag instead of one 1080p camera with great autofocus capability, in my case 4K doesn't cause any issues, neither in post or when using it to reframe and that last part is the main reason why I want 4K, it made a hugh difference for me when shooting ceremonies with unmanned camera's. Also about enlarging noise, actually 4K footage looks less noisy when downscaled because the noise becomes smaller as well but when you go back to it's native resolution, it won't become noisier, it will be equally noisy then when shooting at 1080p, the only difference will be it's 4 times the resolution.
The autofocus capabilities of the c100 performs great but only would not trust it in a non repeatable shot, like with any "auto" function on a camera it can be fooled at just the worst time and send you home with unusable footage. As long as you have control and be able to repeat your shots when needed it's something I wished my camera's would have as well. When you are using that auto face tracking mode, does the camera allow to override this by turning the focus ring if you wanted to correct? |
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Noa, I know with the 70D's autofocus, its touchscreen, so I keep my finger on the spot during non repeatable moments. The processional in particular, with so many faces on screen at once.
|
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Quote:
Plus most filmmakers aren't going to rely on autofocus very often, so if the C100 had 4k I doubt recomposing isn't something I would have to do very often. And I agree 4k isn't often a necessary tool, but I can see situations like this one where it can be beneficial. Personally I think 2.5k or 3k is the sweet spot. |
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Quote:
|
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Quote:
Honestly, it did not appear all that different from any modern high end consumer video camera in that respect. |
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Quote:
|
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Quote:
|
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Quote:
Here are a few bad examples. The only STM is the shot of my son on the deck outside. Its mislabeled as a USM lens. |
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Quote:
|
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Regarding 4k...
yes, the ability to recompose through zooming is handy when you are too rushed, or had other restrictions to keep you from composing properly in the first place. But I don't think too many women (or men even) over 35 are going to want to see themselves in sharp focus when shot and broadcast at 4k. Even at 1080, this can require a little softening. I saw some 4k demo footage recently with a younger model... and it was very revealing... Even with high end makeup. Sports, action scenes, and landscapes - yes. Close ups - no. |
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Quote:
I think we need to stop finding excuses why the c100 doesn't need 4K and maybe start questioning why Canon yet again intentionally cripples their camera to protect sales from higher end models, especially at the c100 pricepoint there is no reason not to incorporate a technology that's going to become a standard on every camera, even smartphones, very soon. 4K might not be something for you and that's fine but there are many other's out there that wished the c100 would do 4K and they would find 4K beneficial for their needs, it's 2015 after all. |
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Quote:
|
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
The c100 downscales internally so it doesn't output 4K, it's 1080p what you get, nothing else. I do know it's about about the focus capabilities here but 4K became a part of the discussion along the way and was not started by me, but I have no problem not talking about it anymore as I have made my point.
|
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
The face Detection on my 70d with a 18 - 135 STM Lens works great. I keep looking for more STM Lenses. My Tokina 11 - 16 works well with Face detection also.
|
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
What I find a bit amusing is the anti 4k crowd acting like it's not possible to shoot 1080p on a 4k camera.
It's like someone saying they don't want a camera to be capable of shooting high frame rates because they don't want big files, don't need slow motion, and it takes up too much time in post. Ummmm...ok then shoot in 24p. 4k is a tool just like any other tool. Sometimes you will need it and sometimes you will not. Would you refuse to buy a camera with built in NF filters because you never shoot in bright sunlight? Personally I like my cameras to have many different tools to suit a wide array of applications and we all know the C100 only falls short in a couple categories. |
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Personally, the c100 has been a great camera, and has paid for itself several times over without slomo or 4k... Just as my 5d2 paid for itself many times over without either. And one day when 4k is the required standard, I know that there will be lots of suitable, and affordable camera options... it's all good.
|
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
I doubt 4k will be a broadcast standard for a least another 5-7 years. Most of the filmmakers who currently use 4k do not deliver in in 4k. They are just using the extra resolution when needed, like any other camera feature. When delivering in 4k is the new standard, filmmakers will likely be looking for 5k or greater to maintain the same creative control. This is why my current preference is 2.5k or 3k.
And we all know there are already plenty of suitable and affordable options... they just don't say Canon on the front. |
Re: Awesome video showing C100mkII tracking AF, Face Detection, Slow Mo
Quote:
The DMC-GH4 does not shoot good 1080. It's very poor compared to its 4K mode downrezzed to 1080, which starts to resemble the C100 resolution. What other camera are you thinking of? |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:12 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network