Bob Drummond
March 13th, 2007, 08:29 AM
Hi folks. I'm new around here. I'm thinking about renting a v1 in a few weekends to play around with, and I have a few questions.
As editing/playing/delivering a finished HD project seems little beyond me at this point, I plan on filming in HDV, saving the footage for potential future use, but editing now in DV, and maybe creating an SD DVD of my weekend tests. The way I see it, even if I won't use HDV immediately, the v1's 3-chip, native 16x9 and native progressive modes will be a quantum leap in quality over the mid-level 1-chip camcorders I've used until now. Correct me if I'm wrong, but even if I film in HDV with the v1, I can still output a down-converted DV feed via firewire.
1. So is there any potential down-side to filming in HDV if I plan on only using it as DV footage for right now?
2. This question is more complex. How is it possible to make the best quality 24p SD DVD Mpeg2 file from the footage? I understand that if I film in 24p a pulldown will be added to the DV footage so that it will play as a normal 60i dv file with the motion characteristics of 24p. I guess I'm wondering if it it really necessary to have my editing package to recognize the footage as true 24p to make the best quality DVD?
There seems to be some confusion how an NTSC DVD stores progressive and 24p content. The famous DVD FAQ (http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html#1.40) states this:
There's enormous confusion about whether DVD video is progressive or interlaced. Here's the one true answer: Progressive-source video (such as from film) is usually encoded on DVD as interlaced field pairs that can be reinterleaved by a progressive player to recreate the original progressive video...
So this seems to mean that even hollywood films transferred to DVD are prepared as a video file with similar settings as the v1 video in 24p dv mode (initially filmed in 24p but transfered to 60i video with the pulldown added to stretch the frames to roughly 30fps)
So if I film in 24p, edit in dv 60i, and flag the resulting mpeg2 file as "progressive" and as having pulldown added, is that about as good as a DVD from v1 footage cam look? If I only pan on delivering an SD DVD is there any benefit from editing and encoding a true 24p file?
As editing/playing/delivering a finished HD project seems little beyond me at this point, I plan on filming in HDV, saving the footage for potential future use, but editing now in DV, and maybe creating an SD DVD of my weekend tests. The way I see it, even if I won't use HDV immediately, the v1's 3-chip, native 16x9 and native progressive modes will be a quantum leap in quality over the mid-level 1-chip camcorders I've used until now. Correct me if I'm wrong, but even if I film in HDV with the v1, I can still output a down-converted DV feed via firewire.
1. So is there any potential down-side to filming in HDV if I plan on only using it as DV footage for right now?
2. This question is more complex. How is it possible to make the best quality 24p SD DVD Mpeg2 file from the footage? I understand that if I film in 24p a pulldown will be added to the DV footage so that it will play as a normal 60i dv file with the motion characteristics of 24p. I guess I'm wondering if it it really necessary to have my editing package to recognize the footage as true 24p to make the best quality DVD?
There seems to be some confusion how an NTSC DVD stores progressive and 24p content. The famous DVD FAQ (http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html#1.40) states this:
There's enormous confusion about whether DVD video is progressive or interlaced. Here's the one true answer: Progressive-source video (such as from film) is usually encoded on DVD as interlaced field pairs that can be reinterleaved by a progressive player to recreate the original progressive video...
So this seems to mean that even hollywood films transferred to DVD are prepared as a video file with similar settings as the v1 video in 24p dv mode (initially filmed in 24p but transfered to 60i video with the pulldown added to stretch the frames to roughly 30fps)
So if I film in 24p, edit in dv 60i, and flag the resulting mpeg2 file as "progressive" and as having pulldown added, is that about as good as a DVD from v1 footage cam look? If I only pan on delivering an SD DVD is there any benefit from editing and encoding a true 24p file?