Jeff Mack
January 26th, 2007, 03:59 PM
I have a question,
I have some HDV footage - 3-5 minute clips of songs. I want to post them to the web for viewing on my site. What I have done so far was to set in/out points on a long session to break out an individual song. I then exported to quicktime movie, self contained. Then I imported that song into compressor and set up to compress it to H.264, 300 Kbps, 16x9. That went relatively fast. The results are at web.mac.com/yasgur. The interlacing is extremely noticeable. I tried changing my frame settings in compressor to the "best" for deinterlacing and after about an hour of rendering, my MBPro said there was 11 hours to go. Obviously these setting are too high.
Can anyone explain a workflow that has a reasonable render time that doesn't look so interlaced with the slightest movements?
Someone suggested about when you keep things SD, to convert to photo jpg to deinterlace.
Any comments for the best final quality from HDV source?
Jeff
I have some HDV footage - 3-5 minute clips of songs. I want to post them to the web for viewing on my site. What I have done so far was to set in/out points on a long session to break out an individual song. I then exported to quicktime movie, self contained. Then I imported that song into compressor and set up to compress it to H.264, 300 Kbps, 16x9. That went relatively fast. The results are at web.mac.com/yasgur. The interlacing is extremely noticeable. I tried changing my frame settings in compressor to the "best" for deinterlacing and after about an hour of rendering, my MBPro said there was 11 hours to go. Obviously these setting are too high.
Can anyone explain a workflow that has a reasonable render time that doesn't look so interlaced with the slightest movements?
Someone suggested about when you keep things SD, to convert to photo jpg to deinterlace.
Any comments for the best final quality from HDV source?
Jeff