View Full Version : Final Cut Pro 5 - HDV workflow?
Benji Wade January 25th, 2007, 12:35 PM Hello everyone, I'm not very smart. Is there a thread somewhere or does somebody know of a link for HDV workflow using FCP5 for dummies like me?
In other words, is there a workaround that allows you to edit in real time without rendering every single time you cut?
Also, when I go to log and capture, I only have one option and that's to name my clip. I can't preview or anything, but I'm assuming I'll need a beefy video card or something in order to have that luxury.
So, just looking for a few pointers, hoping there are others out there like me.
Benji Wade January 25th, 2007, 01:00 PM Please feel free to move this to the proper forum. Sorry, I didn't see the Mac / FCP subforum.
Peter Ford January 25th, 2007, 01:40 PM Make sure your sequence is in the right format- if its a HDV sequence, then you wont need to render every clip, and can edit hdv natively.
Before i start a project, i usually use 'easy setup' to make sure everything is set up for the format im working in.
if youve already started a project, goto sequence, setting, and make sure its all set up for your type of hdv.
What mac have you got? Editing HDV on the fly does use more beef, but i manage to get by using a bottom of the range mac mini (although it struggles at times). Usually i transcode to apple intermediate format- more hd space, but uses less CPU beef.
Hope that helps
Benji Wade January 25th, 2007, 01:54 PM Make sure your sequence is in the right format- if its a HDV sequence, then you wont need to render every clip, and can edit hdv natively.
Before i start a project, i usually use 'easy setup' to make sure everything is set up for the format im working in.
if youve already started a project, goto sequence, setting, and make sure its all set up for your type of hdv.
What mac have you got? Editing HDV on the fly does use more beef, but i manage to get by using a bottom of the range mac mini (although it struggles at times). Usually i transcode to apple intermediate format- more hd space, but uses less CPU beef.
Hope that helps
that's very helpful, but it still requires me to edit anything I take from my bin and place in the timeline...is that normal? This footage was taken from an Canon HV-10 so I assume it's only capable of 1080i 60. That's what I've set the sequence for and it still requires me to render everything. Maybe I am as clueless as I thought!
Benji Wade January 25th, 2007, 02:00 PM I think I figured it out. Last time, I had used Apple's Intermediate codec (I think) and sent it into a DV timeline. That's how clueless I am.
So I have to recapture everything native HDV and then send it to my HDV timeline to edit native.
Do I understand all this correctly? Using the Intermediate codec will save, what, hard drive space and processor? But you'll then have to render everything before putting it in a timeline?
Benji Wade January 25th, 2007, 02:05 PM Nevermind, just read Apple's synopsis of its intermediate codec. It basically stretches everything out on your hard drive but saves the processor from working too hard.
By the way, I'm on a duocore G5 2.0ghz with 1.0 gigs of RAM.
|
|