Lamce Barton
April 2nd, 2003, 07:20 PM
Thanks in advance for checking this out for me:
Okay, just shot and edited a feature on an XL-1s. Will be in stores in about 60 days. I think we screwed up. We shot in NORMAL mode at 1/30 speed. Everyone I talk to now says that was a disaster mistake since we want to do a film blow-up as we should have shot at 1/60 so it could be deinterlaced. My questions are as follows:
1) What is the difference between 1/30 in normal mode and just using frame mode? Don't they both basically end up with a sort of non-interlaced effect as both fields are the same?
2) Is it really critical to shoot in 1/60 if we weren't going to do a film blow-up? 1/30 seems to look a LOT nicer to me, certainly a lot more "filmic".
3) Is there now NO chance of a blow-up since we shot in 1/30? Every transfer house seems to say no.
4) We looked at using DVFilm to process our footage, even though deinterlacing won't work since we shot at 1/30, the grain setting of 5 and the red boost sure make it look like 16 to us.
5) Nobody is talking about this much, but "Park" was shot on an XL-1s, I have no idea of the frame rate, but they shot a studio monitor with a 35 camera and that print went to theaters and looks great! If that is something we can narrow down a bit, everyone would be free to shoot, edit and add effects however they want and for less than 2,000.00 have a print on 35! Before everyone determines that the quality would be terrible, check it out, you might be surprized.
We will live through the DVD release on this project as is, but would love to know any tips or trick to enhance what we have shot at 1/30 and what we should do as we start the next one in June.
Thank you very much for your responses...
Okay, just shot and edited a feature on an XL-1s. Will be in stores in about 60 days. I think we screwed up. We shot in NORMAL mode at 1/30 speed. Everyone I talk to now says that was a disaster mistake since we want to do a film blow-up as we should have shot at 1/60 so it could be deinterlaced. My questions are as follows:
1) What is the difference between 1/30 in normal mode and just using frame mode? Don't they both basically end up with a sort of non-interlaced effect as both fields are the same?
2) Is it really critical to shoot in 1/60 if we weren't going to do a film blow-up? 1/30 seems to look a LOT nicer to me, certainly a lot more "filmic".
3) Is there now NO chance of a blow-up since we shot in 1/30? Every transfer house seems to say no.
4) We looked at using DVFilm to process our footage, even though deinterlacing won't work since we shot at 1/30, the grain setting of 5 and the red boost sure make it look like 16 to us.
5) Nobody is talking about this much, but "Park" was shot on an XL-1s, I have no idea of the frame rate, but they shot a studio monitor with a 35 camera and that print went to theaters and looks great! If that is something we can narrow down a bit, everyone would be free to shoot, edit and add effects however they want and for less than 2,000.00 have a print on 35! Before everyone determines that the quality would be terrible, check it out, you might be surprized.
We will live through the DVD release on this project as is, but would love to know any tips or trick to enhance what we have shot at 1/30 and what we should do as we start the next one in June.
Thank you very much for your responses...