Brian Luce
December 29th, 2006, 02:33 PM
Are the 1.66 duo cores roughly equivalent to a p4 3.2 ghz in computer power? In a vegas enviroment.
View Full Version : cpu power...p4 versus duo core Brian Luce December 29th, 2006, 02:33 PM Are the 1.66 duo cores roughly equivalent to a p4 3.2 ghz in computer power? In a vegas enviroment. Glenn Chan December 29th, 2006, 05:13 PM Yes. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14s - Intel QX6700 4 cores @ 2.66ghz SOURCE: John Cline @ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?ForumID=4&MessageID=496672 SOURCE2: JohnnyRoy @ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?MessageID=501735&Replies=19 15s - Macpro 2X2.66ghz dual core Intel processors (Vegas 7; old result was 45s) SOURCE: Charley Gallagher @ http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=78558 19s - Intel Core 2 Duo overclocked @ 3.56ghz (*overclocked systems should be tested for stability) SOURCE: ro_max@http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?ForumID=4&MessageID=497038 27s - Overclocked Intel E6300 @ 2.33Ghz (266mhz FSB --> 333mhz, 2MB cache, 1.86ghz originally; V6d; V7b = 28s) SOURCE: Guy Bruner @ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?MessageID=488694&Replies=31 28s - Intel E6600 Core 2 Duo (Vegas 6d; 2.4ghz, 4MB cache) SOURCE: Emailed submission. 34s - Intel E6300 Core 2 Duo (Vegas 6d; 35s in Vegas 7b) SOURCE: Guy Bruner @ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?MessageID=488694&Replies=31 39s - AMD X2 4600+ SOURCE: JohnnyRoy @ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?MessageID=423138&Replies=4 *39s/74s - AMD X2 4400+ (Toledo core, 2X2.2ghz, 2X1MB cache, no dual channel memory, Vegas 6.0b) SOURCE: philfort@ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?MessageID=399447&Replies=26 *39s - AMD X2 4400+ overclocked to 2420mhz SOURCE: Jayster @ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?MessageID=465519&Replies=0 *40s/76s - AMD X2 4400+ (Toledo core, 2X2.2ghz, 2X1MB cache, no dual channel memory, Vegas 6.0b) SOURCE: TheRhino@ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?MessageID=396239&Replies=61 44s - Pentium D 3.0ghz SOURCE: GMElliot @ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?ForumID=4&MessageID=454055 see also: http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?MessageID=423138&Replies=8 (45s) 45s - Macpro 2X2.66ghz dual core Intel processors (Vegas 6) SOURCE: Charley Gallagher @ http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=78558 47s - Core Duo 1.83Ghz (laptop) SOURCE: FrigidNDEditing @ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?MessageID=477142&Replies=3 SOURCE: GMElliot @ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?ForumID=4&MessageID=454055 *75s - P4 3.6ghz overclocked from 3.0 Pentium. A new 5xx-series 3.6ghz should be as fast or slightly slower. SOURCE: Stormcrow@ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?MessageID=396239&Replies=57 78s- AMD64 3700+ (san diego core??? [2.2ghz, 1MB cache], vegas 6, dual channel RAM) SOURCE: Charley Gallgher@ http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=45178&page=2&pp=15 *78s- P4 3.2 overclocked to 3.8ghz (Northwood core???, 800FSB [it's overclocked, so the FSB is actually higher]) SOURCE: jamcas@ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?ForumID=4&MessageID=256422 79s- AMD64 3400+ (unknown core, Vegas 6) SOURCE: Charley Gallagher@ http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=45178&page=2&pp=15 89s- 3.0E Pentium Prescott (865 chipset, dual channel RAM, Vegas 5) SOURCE: Glenn Chan@ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?MessageID=396239&Replies=57 90s - 2.8ghz Pentium (Prescott) SOURCE: TalawaMan@ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?Forum=4&MessageID=262716 90s - Opteron 246 2.0ghz X 2 (dual channel memory, old 2004 core, *VEGAS 5*) SOURCE: rohde@ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?ForumID=4&MessageID=256422 *Please keep in mind Vegas6 has optimizations for dual processors, while Vegas 5 does not. 93s - AMD64 3200+ (2004, so probably old core) SOURCE: PH125@ http://mediasoftware.sonypictures.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?ForumID=4&MessageID=256422 99s is Sid Phillip's report in the same thread. 95s - AMD64 3000+ (2.00ghz, 512kb cache, single channel, socket 754, 2004 core) SOURCE: ibliss@ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?ForumID=4&MessageID=256422 114s - Pentium-M 1.7ghz laptop SOURCE: The_Jeff@ http://www.sonymediasoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?Forum=4&MessageID=262716 128s - Sempron 2400+ 1.4ghz (Palmero core, S754, 256KB cache) SOURCE: Glenn Chan Athlon XP: There are results if you look around. They aren't as fast as Pentiums or AMD64. --- These results are for the original rendertest.veg, not the new one. You can download it from: http://www.vasst.com/resource.aspx?id=35443070-0b67-4a2e-807c-a7f431ebd02d Remember to set best rendering mode. The file --> render dialog will override other settings, so be sure to set best mode there. |