Brian Duke
November 24th, 2006, 04:03 AM
Not sure if this is the right forum, but I wanted to share my experience after seeing this promising film by Daren Aronofsky (Requiem for a Dream). I was really excited about watching it, and went to the Grove here in Los Angeles; however, I cannot stress how disappointed I was.
So let me quickly go over the major problems with this movie.
1. There was no real story (generally 3 Acts), but a good idea about forever living. That does not, however, translate into a movie.
2. Most of the shots/scenes were repeated throughout the movie, but not to enhance a story. It seemed like they only shot 40 minutes of footage and then repeated the shots over and over again.
3. There is not any real background or explanation for any of the events in the movie. There is no real pay off or explanation for the end.
4. There was no character development or build up. Frankly, I didn't care about any of the characters.
Overall a real disappoinment, which may have been visually interesting movie, but a narrative challenged one. Again tells me that it is the story that will keep an audience entertained, not special effects.
So let me quickly go over the major problems with this movie.
1. There was no real story (generally 3 Acts), but a good idea about forever living. That does not, however, translate into a movie.
2. Most of the shots/scenes were repeated throughout the movie, but not to enhance a story. It seemed like they only shot 40 minutes of footage and then repeated the shots over and over again.
3. There is not any real background or explanation for any of the events in the movie. There is no real pay off or explanation for the end.
4. There was no character development or build up. Frankly, I didn't care about any of the characters.
Overall a real disappoinment, which may have been visually interesting movie, but a narrative challenged one. Again tells me that it is the story that will keep an audience entertained, not special effects.