View Full Version : Adapting a pro camera's shoulder piece to an XL1s


Josh Bass
March 24th, 2003, 01:12 PM
I have an XL1s, and I'm trying to find a more comfortable solution for handheld work. Recently I noticed that on pro cams, the piece that goes on your shoulder looks to be a separate piece from the body and head of the camera. I was wondering if anyone has tried buying one of these, and adapting it to screw into the tripod plate screw hole. This would help center the XL1s, a very front heavy camera, on your shoulder and keeping your arm from doing all the supporting. Anyway, just wanted some opinions. Doesn't seem like it would be that difficult, unless that shoulder piece costs like $30,000 or something.


"Josh," say those of you who know who I am, "don't you already have an MA100 AND a MediaPro?" Why yes, I do. The MA100 is simply inadequate, and the Media Pro is just awkward and too damn heavy. I need something that doesn't add a lot of mass or bulk to the camera, but puts the shoulder pad closer to where it would be on a pro camera. . .ideally for the XL1s it should mount on the tripod plate, or in that little area created by the angling up of the body. I suppose I would have but the system isolator to move the viewfinder forward if I did this, (or does it move it backward?) right?

Chris Hurd
March 24th, 2003, 01:29 PM
Actually a long time ago I received a tip for the Watchdog from somebody who said a certain Panasonic shoulder mount for one of their older video cameras would fit an XL1 perfectly. I'm not at home now so I can't look this up, but the camera model was something like a WV-F250, from the late '80's or early '90's.

Josh Bass
March 24th, 2003, 04:37 PM
Really? Cool. Who might have one of these cams? Think they'd sell just the shoulder piece?

I have now searched the net for info on this camera without finding any. Chris is right about the name, but that's all I've gathered. Help!

I hear people say "I can do so and so with my camera all day with no fatigue," and I want to be among this class of people.

Dylan Couper
March 25th, 2003, 03:41 PM
So Josh, you finally ran out of regular XL1 stuff to buy, huh?

:)

Josh Bass
March 25th, 2003, 04:56 PM
Yes, that's very clever.

Dylan Couper
March 25th, 2003, 06:52 PM
Actually, I'm very interested in your idea. I've never found an XL1 shoulder mount solution that I liked for long term use.

Josh Bass
March 25th, 2003, 07:44 PM
Well, see Chris's answer above. I did a search for that camera and came up with nothing.

Dylan Couper
March 26th, 2003, 01:58 AM
I searched too, and also came up empty.

If I had a drawing as to what that one looked like, I could check out the feasability of having one made out of aluminum.

Josh Bass
March 26th, 2003, 04:09 AM
You and me both, brother. Of course, you would make mine and mail it to me.

Charles Papert
March 26th, 2003, 06:41 AM
The center of gravity of a stock XL1 is way forward; start adding accessories like wide-angle converters, especially the chunky Century Optics ones, and it keeps moving forward. Shifting the viewfinder forward with the "isolater" is a good start. Adding weight at the back such as an Anton Bauer mount is another. I have long threatened to build a custom base for my XL1 which would allow for proper weight distribution but haven't had time. A camera which is meant to be used handheld should balance on the shoulder, so that one can almost take one's hands off it. The XL1, for all its charms, was not built with this idea in mind. The MA200 with Anton Bauer mount was a step in the right direction, but really the shape of the body is all wrong for a truly ergonomic handheld setup. Let's hope the XL2 puts this in mind.

Dylan Couper
March 26th, 2003, 11:01 AM
Who builds the shoulder mount with a battery accessory holder that goes a little bit down your back? I think it mounts the batteries WAY back there. Do you guys know the one I'm talking about? I've seen it but can't remember the name.

Josh Bass
March 26th, 2003, 12:01 PM
Sounds like the MediaPro, which I already have. Some people like it, doesn't really work for me. I would like something that actually moves the XL1s backward, so the there is less for your arm to support.

Alex Dolgin
March 26th, 2003, 04:01 PM
Josh, we make them since the original XL1 was introduced...
www.dolgin.net

Alex Dolgin

Josh Bass
March 27th, 2003, 12:46 AM
Looks a lot like the idea behind the mediapro, but not as much "height" to the part behind you. Maybe I'll chop half the back piece off.

Jeff Donald
March 30th, 2003, 10:44 AM
I used to own a Panasonic WV-F250. It was introduced in the early ‘90’s. It had a detachable shoulder pad, but it was to accommodate the detachable VTR on the back. I’m sure it could be made to fit but it sure would look odd.

I get mine to balance fairly well by the use of the Lightwave extender Charles mentions. I use the MA-200 (not sure if that makes a difference over the MA-100) and mount the CH-910 with dual 945 batteries and a Sound Devices MM 1. If I’m doing wireless lavs, my Lectrosonics receiver is mounted on the back also. By hanging all that off the end I can get a fairly stable balance to the camera. I can use it for several hours in that configuration without getting too tired. I don’t know if you can get all day comfort out of an XL1, it’s just not designed for that type of work.

Josh Bass
March 30th, 2003, 01:58 PM
I just simply know it would work, regardless of how odd it looks. Does anyone know somewhere that would sell me just that piece of rubber or foam rubber or whatever it is, with the metal plates and screw holes?

Jeff Donald
March 30th, 2003, 03:21 PM
Panasonic might still sell them as replacement parts. Watch ebay for broken F250's. I'm still not sure it would work without extensive modification. It would attach to the XL1 in place of the MA-100/200. In order to use the MA-100/200 you would need to extensively modify the bottom of the XL1 and the adapter. I wonder if Chris is remembering the correct model.

Josh Bass
March 30th, 2003, 05:22 PM
Are you sure? Even if you screwed the shoulder piece into the tripod plate, and not the MA100 screw hole? That was my plan.

I still have a few options before I go looking on ebay. I'm gonna try to get it for free first.