Heath McKnight
November 5th, 2006, 09:50 PM
We shot the film in 13 1/2 days and, amazingly, the second-to-last day saw us shooting 15 (!) pages, including two driving scenes and two scenes with a Steadicam. My crew was incredibly fast and talented, led by Director of Photography Jon Fordham (www.jonfordham.com).
I learned a lot on this film, esp. since my first feature, Skye Falling (http://www.amazon.com/SKYE-FALLING-Heath-McKnight/dp/B000BDCEWS/sr=8-1/qid=1162784903/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-3497475-0721551?ie=UTF8&s=dvd), was shot dogme 95-style in 1999 on an XL1, at least a full year before digital cinema was embraced. I feel I have grown as a writer and director, and that one should only shoot a feature with a solid cast and crew, and one should do it consecutively (Skye was shot on my days off and nights for 2 months, with a 10 day marathon that saw about 1/2 being shot.)
We planned it well, but I didn't hire an A.D. (http://904am.com/crew.php?Theresa+Piorkowski) until the first day of production. I also wish I had a more dedicated sound crew instead of just one guy. Lastly, on my next feature, which should shoot late 2007/early 2008 (much sooner than 9:04 AM--that sucker took 9.5 years to get to production!), I'll be hiring a UPM and a Line Producer, depending on the budget.
But remember, my cast (http://904am.com/cast.php) was incredible and my crew (http://904am.com/crew.php) were extremely talented and more than willing to kick ass on set.
I'm cutting the movie now, shot on the Z1u in 50i with CineFrame 25. I captured all the tapes vs. logging and capturing, because I have a dedicated 300 gb drive (already need another) and my scripty took good notes and timecodes.
The rough cut, believe it or not, took only 3 days, partially because of the capturing of all tapes and scripty notes, but also because after years of working in TV news as a tape editor and a Creative Services producer, I got pretty fast. And I can finally say that Final Cut Pro works for me instead of vice versa. When I cut Skye, FCP had come out just a few months prior, and I'd never cut non-linear before. So the two months to get a rough cut was partly due to the learning curve.
We had a test screening last night and I am going to do some further editing and we'll shoot some more establishing shots. Then another test screening and more polishing, soundtrack, sound editing/design, color correction, f/x and then, it will hopefully be done. My goal is a premiere in the spring 2007.
For more on the film, visit www.904am.com where I've been blogging for 6 years now. And for more on my films, visit www.mpsdigital.com.
Thanks,
heath
I learned a lot on this film, esp. since my first feature, Skye Falling (http://www.amazon.com/SKYE-FALLING-Heath-McKnight/dp/B000BDCEWS/sr=8-1/qid=1162784903/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-3497475-0721551?ie=UTF8&s=dvd), was shot dogme 95-style in 1999 on an XL1, at least a full year before digital cinema was embraced. I feel I have grown as a writer and director, and that one should only shoot a feature with a solid cast and crew, and one should do it consecutively (Skye was shot on my days off and nights for 2 months, with a 10 day marathon that saw about 1/2 being shot.)
We planned it well, but I didn't hire an A.D. (http://904am.com/crew.php?Theresa+Piorkowski) until the first day of production. I also wish I had a more dedicated sound crew instead of just one guy. Lastly, on my next feature, which should shoot late 2007/early 2008 (much sooner than 9:04 AM--that sucker took 9.5 years to get to production!), I'll be hiring a UPM and a Line Producer, depending on the budget.
But remember, my cast (http://904am.com/cast.php) was incredible and my crew (http://904am.com/crew.php) were extremely talented and more than willing to kick ass on set.
I'm cutting the movie now, shot on the Z1u in 50i with CineFrame 25. I captured all the tapes vs. logging and capturing, because I have a dedicated 300 gb drive (already need another) and my scripty took good notes and timecodes.
The rough cut, believe it or not, took only 3 days, partially because of the capturing of all tapes and scripty notes, but also because after years of working in TV news as a tape editor and a Creative Services producer, I got pretty fast. And I can finally say that Final Cut Pro works for me instead of vice versa. When I cut Skye, FCP had come out just a few months prior, and I'd never cut non-linear before. So the two months to get a rough cut was partly due to the learning curve.
We had a test screening last night and I am going to do some further editing and we'll shoot some more establishing shots. Then another test screening and more polishing, soundtrack, sound editing/design, color correction, f/x and then, it will hopefully be done. My goal is a premiere in the spring 2007.
For more on the film, visit www.904am.com where I've been blogging for 6 years now. And for more on my films, visit www.mpsdigital.com.
Thanks,
heath