View Full Version : How to "X" in Vegas 7


Steve Mullen
November 2nd, 2006, 05:05 AM
I've used Vegas from V5, V6, and now V7. I've overlooked the lack of certain NLE capabilities, but now I need them. The odd thing is that I've found no posts or anything in the "Getting Started ..." asking/answering what seem like obvious questions to anyone who uses ANY other NLE.

1) The Timeline & Trimmer Time Cursor can only be dragged VERY, VERY slowly. What's wrong? (I don't want to use the Shuttle control as it's cute, but this is a computer, not a VTR.)

2) I want to instantly move to a point in the Timeline & Trimmer! But, if one touches anywhere in the Timeline Timescale to get the Time Cursor to move to this point, a "blue drag" is started. If one doesn't accidently get a blue drag, it's very easy to get yellow marks with a gray area between. I don't want either!

3) How does one SIMPLY get rid of the blue or gray areas -- I simply want IN and OUT marks.

4) Precise editing in every NLE, except iMovie, is done by 3-point editing. That means either 2 points in the Source and 1 in the Timeline OR 1 in the Source and 2 in the Timeline.

I've tried everything to accomplish this. For example, setting a LOOP area in the Timeline and placing the cursor at the beginning or end. Sending a clip from the Trimmer to the Loop seems not to work.

5) It's not only necessary to support 3-point editing, it must be possible to set an OUT-point in the Source and have the insert be "backtimed" based upon the 2 points in the Timeline.

6) Since, one needs IN and OUT points in the Timeline & Trimmer, these buttons are required, but missing:

MARK IN (yes, the I key works)
GO TO MARK IN
CLEAR MARK IN

MARK OUT (yes, the O key works)
GO TO MARK OUT
CLEAR MARK OUT

MARK ENTIRE CLIP
CLEAR IN & OUT
PLAY IN TO OUT

MOVE TO PREVIOUS EDIT (yes, the [ key works)
MOVE TO NEXT EDIT (yes, the ] key works)

7) With Liquid and FCP, either the Source or Record monitor can be sent via VGA/DVI to an HDTV for a full HD display. I see an External Monitor button on Vegas, but it seems to do nothing. From reading posts, I get the sense Vegas dosn't support VGA/DVI HD output of the current monitor. Correct?

8) Is there any way to get a Source Monitor window and not the "Trimmer mini-timeline?"

Edward Troxel
November 2nd, 2006, 08:31 AM
1) The Timeline & Trimmer Time Cursor can only be dragged VERY, VERY slowly. What's wrong? (I don't want to use the Shuttle control as it's cute, but this is a computer, not a VTR.)

Don't click on the icon at the top of the cursor line. Instead, just click anywhere and drag. This will, technically, create a "selection area" as you drag but you can move VERY quickly throughout the project this way.

2) I want to instantly move to a point in the Timeline & Trimmer! But, if one touches anywhere in the Timeline Timescale to get the Time Cursor to move to this point, a "blue drag" is started. If one doesn't accidently get a blue drag, it's very easy to get yellow marks with a gray area between. I don't want either!

I guess I'm not quite following here. If you know the exact timecode you wish to jump to, you can easily do that by double-clicking the timecode below the timeline and typing in the new value. Your "blue drag" is called a "Selection Area". If you want to click somewhere and the selection area disappear, go to Options - Preferences - Editing tab, and check the "Collapes Loop Region" checkbox.

3) How does one SIMPLY get rid of the blue or gray areas -- I simply want IN and OUT marks.

You don't. The "blue or gray" indicates the selected area showing the space between the IN and OUT marks.

4) Precise editing in every NLE, except iMovie, is done by 3-point editing. That means either 2 points in the Source and 1 in the Timeline OR 1 in the Source and 2 in the Timeline.

I've tried everything to accomplish this. For example, setting a LOOP area in the Timeline and placing the cursor at the beginning or end. Sending a clip from the Trimmer to the Loop seems not to work.

Many people do this all the time. For example, set up the loop area on the timeline, put the cursor on the first frame you want in the trimmer, and press "A". That will add video starting at the cursor location in the trimmer in that selection area on the timeline - and only the exact selected length on the timeline.

5) It's not only necessary to support 3-point editing, it must be possible to set an OUT-point in the Source and have the insert be "backtimed" based upon the 2 points in the Timeline.

To do that, use "Shift-A" instead of "A".

6) Since, one needs IN and OUT points in the Timeline & Trimmer, these buttons are required, but missing:

MARK IN (yes, the I key works)
GO TO MARK IN
CLEAR MARK IN

MARK OUT (yes, the O key works)
GO TO MARK OUT
CLEAR MARK OUT

MARK ENTIRE CLIP
CLEAR IN & OUT
PLAY IN TO OUT

MOVE TO PREVIOUS EDIT (yes, the [ key works)
MOVE TO NEXT EDIT (yes, the ] key works)

Nope. Just use the procedure I mentioned above.

7) With Liquid and FCP, either the Source or Record monitor can be sent via VGA/DVI to an HDTV for a full HD display. I see an External Monitor button on Vegas, but it seems to do nothing. From reading posts, I get the sense Vegas dosn't support VGA/DVI HD output of the current monitor. Correct?

You have the option of previewing externally via:
Firewire (will downconvert to SD)
Secondary monitor (uses a second monitor connected to your video card)
Other hardware (like decklink cards)

Options - Preferences - Preview Device is where you select the desired "external" preview method.

8) Is there any way to get a Source Monitor window and not the "Trimmer mini-timeline?"

Vegas has ONE monitor window. It will always show the cursor position of whichever window has the focus. If you're looking at the timeline, it will show the cursor location on the timeline. If you're looking at the trimmer, it will show the cursor location on the trimmer. If you click something in the explorer window, it will show that.

David Jimerson
November 2nd, 2006, 08:52 AM
It's important to remember that Vegas didn't develop the same way other editing apps did. Other apps developed mimicking the way old-style source/record linear editors worked. Vegas was developed not from the point of view of "how has this always been done," but from the point of view of "what's the best way to do this"?

To wit, Vegas is capable of doing everything you say, just not in the way you're used to.

As for the source monitor, a lot of people complain that it's not there when they first try Vegas, but it's not too long before they stop missing it. It's a waste of screen real estate IMHO.

Douglas Spotted Eagle
November 2nd, 2006, 09:08 AM
Amen. In fact, other apps have been asked to *kill* the source window, as it's a waste of time.

The "tiny" timeline view can actually be made to be larger than the preview window should you desire.

Vegas isn't locked into 3 or 4 point editing, but it is done exactly the same way as an Avid or FCP system should you want to work that way.

"I" for "IN", "O" for OUT" and then "A" for "ADD" to the timeline at the point of the cursor. Many people also use "R" to mark a Region in the Trimmer.

Jason Robinson
November 2nd, 2006, 02:54 PM
I had a fun experience 2 years ago when I wanted to try video editing because I had never used any, period. So I got the demos of everything and the only one that made sense was vegas (though I didn't try anything on the Mac since I don't have one). Avid was OK but confusing to find anything. Liquid annoyed me because nothing made sense. Vegas just seemed to work the most intuitively and the GUI helpd a lot with mouse over hints, prompts, etc.

jason

Simon Wyndham
November 2nd, 2006, 04:02 PM
I always get a laugh out of people who expect Vegas to work the same way as a traditional NLE. At the same time it is tragic because some of them give up on it.

Chris Barcellos
November 2nd, 2006, 04:25 PM
I always get a laugh out of people who expect Vegas to work the same way as a traditional NLE. At the same time it is tragic because some of them give up on it.

Yes, it is tragic. I am one of those who is so used to the Premiere style, that I am having trouble forcing myself to use Vegas. I have full versions of both, but I still migrate back to Premiere, and it seems to be faster in the rendering area. But like a trooper I keep trying to get on the Vegas wagon mainly because it seems to be highly recommended in this community. But old habits die hard. And there are some things I just like doing better in Premiere. For instance, the way you access transitions or effects seems more intuitive and easier to me in Premiere.

I know, I know, I need training, but I did learn Premiere without trainings, so I guess I will learn Vegas too.

David Jimerson
November 2nd, 2006, 04:42 PM
For instance, the way you access transitions or effects seems more intuitive and easier to me in Premiere.

How so? Ideally, you should just have the transition or FX windows active; you just drag/drop. Nothing easier than that.

If you work dual-screen (and everyone should), you can have every tool pallette open all the time, and then it's a matter of drag-drop for just about anything you can think of.

Douglas Spotted Eagle
November 2nd, 2006, 04:48 PM
I'd LOVE to be able to work dual screen most of the time. Until someone makes a laptop with dual screens, or until I can find more time to be at home and less on the road, a single screen has to suffice. So, I've worked out a Vegas layout that works for me. I do wish the window text was smaller ala FCP/AVID so that I could size the windows down and have more info available.

Coming to Vegas from other NLE's is either very easy or very difficult. Either you catch on right away or you fight with it. It's all about editing style and what makes sense to you. I had no issue at all stepping right into FCP but struggled with Canopus Edius for a week or two. Struggled with Avid a bit, and still struggle with Boris, simply because they are "thought" differently at the programming/GUI/workflow set up stages.

David Jimerson
November 2nd, 2006, 05:18 PM
Valid point, Spot. Most mortals don't travel as much as you do, though!

I've managed to do a mini-version of my dual-screen desktop layout on the laptop, though. You don't get dual-screen, but you do get about a screen and a third if you have the main Vegas window take up a 4:3 section (apprx) of your 16:10 screen.

Steve Mullen
November 2nd, 2006, 07:51 PM
I'd LOVE to be able to work dual screen most of the time. Until someone makes a laptop with dual screens, or until I can find more time to be at home and less on the road, a single screen has to suffice.

I'm working on a 1200x800 MacBook that I'll carry to Asia along with a Sony camcorder. But, I would like the Preview window on an external HDTV. (Yes, 16:9 HDTV-ready sets are very available in Asian homes.)

So I'm still not clear -- can just the Preview window be sent out via the second port on one's laptop to an HDTV?

---------------------

By the way, there is a very good reason why every NLE has a Source window. When one is trimming a Source clip, one needs to see the LAST frame of the outgoing clip in the Timeline. (Or, review a portion of the Timeline.) It's also used for Match Frame editing.

Steve Mullen
November 2nd, 2006, 08:13 PM
Vegas isn't locked into 3 or 4 point editing, but it is done exactly the same way as an Avid or FCP system should you want to work that way.

3-point editing has been used for over 30-years and for a very good reason -- it's the fastest way to do PRECISE editing FAST. So it's not clear why you think one is "locked" into something that's been proven to work perfectly. :)

"... and then "A" for "ADD" to the timeline at the point of the cursor."

That's not how these NLE's work as they Insert or Overlay between the IN and OUT points -- the cursor has nothing to do with it.

With Vegas, the incoming clip does NOT to stay within the IN/OUT area. The incoming clip, from it's In-point simply goes into the Track either before or after the cursor -- often wiping-out adjacent clips. I'm using the buttons below the Trimmer window. Am I missing something?

OK -- I understand the idea of a "loop" between IN and OUT, but "region?"

Douglas Spotted Eagle
November 2nd, 2006, 08:16 PM
The external monitor output of most laptops may double as a second display head, yes. Vegas will output via the Macbook Pro over the second head for the preview window.

Vegas allows you to do match frame as well, it's a matter of how you use the windows. In other words, it's understanding the app. The source window is a waste of real estate, IMO, and as others (who are doing work for film, broadcast, corporate as full time gigs have expressed) also don't feel they need it. But, sometimes the way a mind works and a software workflow don't mix.

BTW, see the cover of today's Screen Actors Guild magazine. A film we co-produced took the cover this month. Shot with Z1, edited entirely in Vegas. Over 3000 master clips, 120 minute film. LOTS of matching, lots of trimmer, subclip, and proxy files used. With proxies, composites, and match files, the project has roughly 12,000 events NOT including audio events, of which there are at least 4000. Finished entirely in Vegas. Much of it edited on a laptop outputting over a second head. The rest edited on an aging Dell (1.6GHzP3)
http://www.sagindie.org/spotlight.html

With Vegas, the incoming clip does NOT to stay within the IN/OUT area. The incoming clip, from it's In-point simply goes into the Track either before or after the cursor -- often wiping-out adjacent clips. I'm using the buttons below the Trimmer window. Am I missing something?

Yes. You're describing a four point edit, not a 3 point edit, and Vegas can do that, as well. Or insert editing, or insert assembly editing.

Yes, there are quite a few HD displays in Asia. And Australia. And....well....everywhere but EU. Brazil is full of them, so is much of the rest of South America. South Africa is as well.

Steve Mullen
November 2nd, 2006, 09:57 PM
The external monitor output of most laptops may double as a second display head, yes. Vegas will output via the Macbook Pro over the second head for the preview window.

Yes. You're describing a four point edit, not a 3 point edit, and Vegas can do that, as well. Or insert editing, or insert assembly editing.

If I'm missing something something, which I may be, it's because the only manual shipped is a very short "Getting Started ..." that covers none of these subjects. There's a reason Avid and FCP ship with a 2-inch manual. :)

I've downloaded the Sony Vegas PDF, however, the list of main topics doesn't even have an entry for "Trimmer."

By searching, I did find a SYNC TO description on page 123 . It will create a Selection in the Trimmer equal in length to a Region in the Timeline. Sounds good, but there's nothing about how to get this selection to line-up with a Mark In or Mark Out point already placed in the Trimmer.

It says to "drag" it where you want it. Dragging is never precise, which is why the world uses In and Out points. (I'm sure that any In/Out previously set is removed by the Sync and if you set an In/Out after the Sync it will screw-up the Sync!)

I suppose one could preset a MARK, and drag to it, but this adds even more steps to a convoluted procedure.

So, based upon the documentation supplied by Sony -- 3-point editing cannot be done. I'm not saying it can't be done -- I'm saying it's not documented.

Moreover, there is nothing obvious in the PDF about how to create a 4-point edit. Searching for the term yields nothing.

I've reviewed every NLE ever made, and it's nice to take a class to learn insider "tips" -- but the fundamental 2-, 3-, and 4-point editing operations are covered in great depth by the supplied documentation.

Moreover, given that Vegas departs from both world-wide, industry-standard terminology AND editing style -- it is even more Sony's responsibility to document their NLE in a manner that works for those who already know how to edit and have been editing for 30 years.

How about a book that available at a bookstore?

UPDATE: Found DSE's book. Only 4-pages on Placing Events in the Timeline and it didn't even mention the Sync Option I found in the PDF. No index item for Sync. Nothing on three- or four-point editing. So it remains an undocumented capability.

David Jimerson
November 2nd, 2006, 10:40 PM
In the Vegas HELP file (F1):

Three-point editing

1. Open a media file in the Trimmer.

2. Mark the in and out points in your media file to create a selection:

a. Click the Play button in the Trimmer to start playback.

b. Press [ or I to mark the beginning of the selection.

c. Press ] or O to mark the end of the selection.

3. Position the cursor in the timeline where you want to add the event.

4. Click the Add Media from Cursor button to insert the selection after the cursor position in the currently selected track, or click the Add Media Up to Cursor button to insert the selection before the cursor.


Look around in the Help file for a while. It's FANTASTIC. Better than the manual in many respects, and always available right while editing.

Douglas Spotted Eagle
November 2nd, 2006, 10:45 PM
Vegas might not have the greatest documentation, but it is easy to figure out, unless you're trying to apply paradigms from other applications to Vegas. If you're going to get into the old-world paradigms, Vegas definitely isn't the app for you, as it's not based on a 30 year old model that emulates tape, but rather was the first "true" non-linear editing system that didn't rely on old models, which is why it is a significantly faster workflow, format agnostic, resolution independent compositor, multitrack recorder, and editor.

You can purchase books from one of two authors for Vegas; one from Doug Sahlin, who clearly isn't a Vegas user but a damn good writer, or one of four books that I've written on the app. You've already posted that I'm not a good writer, but one thing I'm pretty good at is using Vegas. ;-)

1. Put two events on the timeline. Be sure they're separated by "X" amount. This will be similar to, but not the same as an insert edit.

2. Double click between the events. This creates a selection, indicated by a grey area, between the two events.

3. Open a clip in the trimmer. You can do this by:

A; setting a pref in the Options/Prefs to open any double clicked clip in the Trimmer
B; Right click a clip in the Vegas Explorer and choose "Open in Trimmer."

4. Now select your In point on the clip that is in the trimmer. No setting of markers anywhere, just place/scrub the cursor to your desired in point.

5. Now press "A" for Add.

This will automatically determine the Out point by the length of your selection or In/Out point (as determined by the selection) on the timeline.

Your clip becomes an inserted event with the In point of the CLIP selected when you placed your cursor in the Trimmer, the In/Out points on the timeline determined by your selection created when you double clicked.

That's a four-point edit in most systems.

[edit] I see David beat me to explaining a three point edit, so deleted my three point instruction.

Vegas is easily the fastest editing system on the planet. It might be seriously challenged for speed but not features with the soon to be released SpeedEdit from NewTek, but it's a fairly sparse app.

If you're looking for weaknesses in the Vegas system, they're not hard to find, but they're not at all basic editing features. If you really want to, you can EXACTLY emulate keystrokes from AVID or FCP with the Keyboard manager. Most of the similar tasks are already key-mapped to be like Avid.

Rolling edits, sliding I/O points, channel-dependent ripples, slip edits, they're all there. You just gotta open the on-line help that David mentioned; it's FILLED with examples, specific tasks, etc.

Matti Remonen
November 3rd, 2006, 01:00 AM
Just to add my €0.02 worth. And no, I'm not a professional in this arena, just a "regular home-video guy".

I've newer used any other NLE than Vegas (except Windows MovieMaker for a very short time). Instead I'm computer professional with bacground of 20+ years of system design, programming and consulting. Vegas is more like any other computer application than it is a video editor in my mind. It felt extremely comfortable from the first encounter onwards.

And getting back what Steve said in the beginning:
1) The Timeline & Trimmer Time Cursor can only be dragged VERY, VERY slowly. What's wrong? (I don't want to use the Shuttle control as it's cute, but this is a computer, not a VTR.)
How come? You just grab the timeline (not the "bug" in the top but just the line) and move it as much and as fast as you will/can.

And I do not know what is three or four point editing. I don't care, I just edit. I drop the event to timeline and trim it directly there. Only if I have extremely long take (tens of minutes) I might use trimmer. I use very much S (for splitting) to make rough cutting. Then I switch to Edge Trimming (with Num-7 and Num-9) and trim the take on frame precision using trimming keys. Actually I use ShuttlePro2 for this. Eventhough this is a computer and not a VCR I like to use ShuttlePro. I'm using keyboard and mouse also because it is so hard to find a decent cardreader nowadays (don't know the exact term for the equipment, but you know those perforated cards used to input computer commands in sixties).

All the best,

MRe

Steve Mullen
November 3rd, 2006, 04:35 AM
And I do not know what is three or four point editing. I don't care, I just edit. I drop the event to timeline and trim it directly there. Only if I have extremely long take (tens of minutes) I might use trimmer. I use very much S (for splitting) to make rough cutting. Then I switch to Edge Trimming (with Num-7 and Num-9) and trim the take on frame precision using trimming keys.

From the comments, other than from DSE, it seems clear that many don't understand 3/4-point editing. What's being done is drag&drop editing. I've used Vegas since V5 and used this style, and of course, it works. But, it can't be EFFICIENTLY used for complex, precise editing. And, efficiency is why Hollywood and TV uses Avid.

3/4-point editing is one of the primary reasons because it achieves precision the fastest possible way. Avid editors ONLY use the keyboard which is why they can edit, as they must, very rapidly under pressure.

Bottom-line: Once the main AV track has been laid down, EVERY addition to a Timeline "should" be done using 3-point editing. Every still, title, extra audio, extra video -- every element -- is precisely inserted and not dragged into the Timeline.

1) The 2 SEND TO CURSOR functions are not 3-point editing. Thankfully, I have been able to use the SYNC function (page 123) and then dragged the Selection in the Trimmer to the cursor which I have pre-placed at the start or end of the correct point in the Source clip. (After which one must drag the selection to the Timeline.) So, I can now SIMULATE a 3-point edit. But, this is NOT 3/4-point editing. It's like hammering in a screw.

2) Using a Numeric Keypad for the primary trim commands was obviously invented in the days before laptops. This is a killer limitation. Thankfully, I don't have a big need to Trim "by pixel" or by "CD Index." :)

3) When you say you drop a long clip into the Timeline and trim it -- that works fine if you are creating a simple one track video. But, let's say you have two cutaways 1-minute apart in an upper track. Now you want to "precisely" place a third cutaway between them.

Sure you can place the cursor at the beiginning/ending of where the cutaway should go. But, what's going to happen when (IN NON-RIPPLE MODE WHICH YOU SHOULD BE IN) you send a 5-minute clip to the cursor point. You'll wipe-out either the first or second cutaway. Whoops!

-----------

Now to be honest, Avid's "modal" interface drives me nuts which is why I use FCP, EDIUS, Premier, and Liquid. All these NLE's offer most, but not all, of Avid's power, yet are far more relaxed in their rules.

And, like you -- I mostly drag&drop because its EZ. But:

1) I know I'm not editing correctly.

2) I don't teach this method because I don't want my students laughed at when they try to get a job.

3) I know my NLE can do 3/4-point editing when a Timeline gets complex.

Now, I've learned that I can at least simulate 3-point editing in Vegas. Hopefully, we can get past the "new way" is better than the "old way" attitude that pops up everytime Vegas is found missing a function. Every NLE has missing functions.

One question: It's way too easy to wind-up with a dark gray bar between IN and OUT points. It's a distraction. That's why other NLE's offer a CLEAR BOTH IN AND OUT button or key. What's the simplest way to erase both In and Out points.

PS: Vegas seems to be working fine on the MacBook with 1080i HDV. Preview quality is typically full-speed.

The only problem is I can't set the Intel 950 under Windows to open a second monitor larger than 720x480. Thnakfully, Vegas uses it fine -- but I must Zoom 4:3 to 16:9 on my HDTV.

Edward Troxel
November 3rd, 2006, 08:30 AM
3/4-point editing is one of the primary reasons because it achieves precision the fastest possible way. Avid editors ONLY use the keyboard which is why they can edit, as they must, very rapidly under pressure.

Bottom-line: Once the main AV track has been laid down, EVERY addition to a Timeline "should" be done using 3-point editing. Every still, title, extra audio, extra video -- every element -- is precisely inserted and not dragged into the Timeline.

1) The 2 SEND TO CURSOR functions are not 3-point editing. Thankfully, I have been able to use the SYNC function (page 123) and then dragged the Selection in the Trimmer to the cursor which I have pre-placed at the start or end of the correct point in the Source clip. (After which one must drag the selection to the Timeline.) So, I can now SIMULATE a 3-point edit. But, this is NOT 3/4-point editing. It's like hammering in a screw.

3) When you say you drop a long clip into the Timeline and trim it -- that works fine if you are creating a simple one track video. But, let's say you have two cutaways 1-minute apart in an upper track. Now you want to "precisely" place a third cutaway between them.

Sure you can place the cursor at the beiginning/ending of where the cutaway should go. But, what's going to happen when (IN NON-RIPPLE MODE WHICH YOU SHOULD BE IN) you send a 5-minute clip to the cursor point. You'll wipe-out either the first or second cutaway. Whoops!

I'm still not understanding your problem. You want to fill in the 1 minute gap - very simple. Double-click the gap which will create a selection area around that 1 minute area. Now, in the trimmer, click on the FIRST frame to appear in that gap. Now press "A". This will fill that gap and ONLY that gap. This is the exact instructions I gave in the first post. Three points - data added precisely where you wanted it.



2) Using a Numeric Keypad for the primary trim commands was obviously invented in the days before laptops. This is a killer limitation. Thankfully, I don't have a big need to Trim "by pixel" or by "CD Index." :)

My laptop DOES have a numeric keypad. Not all laptops are missing the keypad. I agree that on the laptops that do not, it is a pain to switch back and forth between modes but it can still be done. Better yet, get a USB numeric keypad or reassign the functions to some other key.

Douglas Spotted Eagle
November 3rd, 2006, 08:32 AM
you're not "simulating" a 3 point edit. Nor are you simulating a 4 point edit. The media doesn't have to go to cursor, that simply is how it's been explained to you.

And, in YOUR OPINION, every editor should be inserting from a source window, which demonstrates you're not an editor that sits behind a computer all day cutting video for a living. Those of us that do love the fact that we can drag, insert, 3 point, 4 point, generate, slip edit, roll edit or whatever we want. And do so efficiently.

If you want Vegas to behave like a "30 year old paradigm" then you should probably be editing with the 30 year old application, because you've already wrongfully denounced several features in Vegas.


And, like you -- I mostly drag&drop because its EZ. But:

1) I know I'm not editing correctly.

2) I don't teach this method because I don't want my students laughed at when they try to get a job.

3) I know my NLE can do 3/4-point editing when a Timeline gets complex.

"Not editing correctly?" Damn, didn't know there were rules requiring a certain workflow. If that's the case, then every non-Avid editor should fold up his tent and go packing.

I have students, Jeffery Fisher does, Mike Chenoweth does, John Rofrano does, Paul Zimmerman does; Keith Kolbo does, Patrick Masters does, and how ever many others I don't care to name, because we genuinely have classes we teach both for certification and not for certification. Who are you to suggest that we're teaching incorrect techniques whether it's Vegas, FCP, Xpress Pro, or Final Cut? You're currently a journalist, not a shooter, editor, or instructor.

On behalf of those of us that are "not editing correctly", I'd submit that many of us are making a great living and having a great time while doing so. And doing so for small clients like MTV, CNN, Fox Sports, ESPN, Discovery, Food Network, TLC, ABC Nightline, ABC News, NBC, HBO, Showtime, Encore, Justice Network, Disney, Comcast, yadayadayada.

Matti Remonen
November 3rd, 2006, 08:53 AM
You want to fill in the 1 minute gap - very simple. Double-click the gap ...
Thanks Edward, this really made my day. In two days I've again learned more about Vegas than in during last six months (about how to show/hide envelopes and now this).

You know: Vegas is like Word (the MS app): you probably use 10% of its power and features in any given time but everybody is utilizing different 10% slice of the full potential. Everyday you learn something new if you just walk your eyes open.

SPOT: calm down ;) it's not worth it.

And yes. I do not understand the 3/4 -point editing. I can hardly do a 3-point turn with my car. But so what, this is not a religion, its an app. The bottom line here is how fast and on what quality it will help you to get your job done.

Marco Durando
November 3rd, 2006, 10:23 AM
I'm only a hobbyist videomaker, I recently tried Vegas 7 and found it quite easy and practical to use after a short training period, although I was used to Premiere Pro (that is quite different).

However I couldn't find a way to perform in Vegas a simple task: having a clip that freezes on a certain frame and holds it for a defined time (in Premiere this was easily done by "Hold on" associated to "in/out point" or "marker").

May I take advantage of your knowledge and ask you whether this is possible in Vegas and how ?

Thank you

Edward Troxel
November 3rd, 2006, 10:37 AM
Yes it is. You simply add a Velocity envelope, add a point the frame before the cursor and a point at the cursor location and change the second one to 0%. If you want a gradual slowdown, put more space between the two points. Vol 1 #9 of my newsletters (http://www.jetdv.com) explains changing the speed of a clip in much more detail. Also search for Velocity in the help file. 0% is freezeframe.

Bill Ravens
November 3rd, 2006, 11:50 AM
doncha just love brand loyalty? i work with a lot of PhD's, and beleive me, they have one way...their way. too funny.

BTW, Steve, I am most greatful to you for your JVC GY-HD110 handbook. There's info in there no one else has ever explained to me.

David Jimerson
November 3rd, 2006, 02:44 PM
There's a difference between respecting a particular tool and "brand loyalty." Me, I don't give a rip about Sony in the slightest.

David McKnight
November 3rd, 2006, 06:32 PM
I don't understand what the initial problem is?

1. Other, older tools FORCE you to do things one way.

2. If you want to do things that way, Vegas will let you.

3. At the moment, you can't (or couldn't) figure out how to do it so you condemn Vegas?

I can't understand why you'd want to follow a 30-year old, less efficient paradigm. And if you say it's because that's the way it's always been done and that you're teaching editors this way for employment reasons, I say baloney. I'd rather have a sharp independent thinking editor that can efficiently SOLVE PROBLEMS and deliver the goods, I don't really care what NLE he uses or which method he chooses to edit. You should be showing them how to do these 3-point edits in Vegas and them show them that they don't have to do it that way anymore!

For me, I may never work in someone else's post facility, all my stuff would come through independent channels. And my opinion is that in the future you will see more of that. Just as recording studios have become project based businesses, so will editing and post production.

Steve Mullen
November 3rd, 2006, 09:23 PM
I just moved to LV, but in NYC I taught at Video Production at Rutgers, the University of the Arts, and in NYC. Of course, one needs a PhD to teach university students. :)

My coverage of Vegas in HDV@Work (25,000+ readers twice a month) would be very good for Vegas, but since all of my readers are professionals who do use 3-point editing, I don't think they really want to hear they are "30 years behind."

Moreover, this thread will certainly give pause to anyone looking at Vegas before buying. Most folks want a tool, not a religion. They want questions answered. They do not want to be told they don't need answers because they are "doing it wrong."

I suggest those who want to learn how to edit efficiently, read my bi-monthly series on Avid editing at camcorderinfo.com. Next week I'll cover trimming. Later, you'll learn true 3-point editing.

Chris Hurd
November 6th, 2006, 12:48 AM
It's clear that part of the appeal of Vegas (make that tremendous appeal... it's the fourth most active forum here, and it enjoys a level of enthusiasm from its worldwide users similar to that of Final Cut Pro) is the variety of available ways with which one can accomplish a given task. In fact it reminds me of Final Cut quite a bit in its flexibility; in Vegas, like Final Cut, you can pick a particular task and find several ways to do it, as has been demonstrated in this thread.

Its customization is also appealing: as has been pointed out, if you want Vegas to work like an Avid application, then you can simply map the keyboard within Vegas to function exactly as it would in Avid.

Using a Numeric Keypad for the primary trim commands was obviously invented in the days before laptops.Add a numeric keypad to any laptop for $20, and gain an extra USB port in the process:

http://www.targus.com/us/product_details.asp?sku=PAKP004U

While Vegas might not yet be found in a Hollywood edit suite, it's worth noting that more than a couple of broadcast news affiliates are using Vegas to prepare their ENG packages for air... Digital Media Net ran a story on one such station in Dallas. I'll try to find that link.

Edit: Here's that link: http://vegas.digitalmedianet.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=28885

Steve Mullen
November 6th, 2006, 04:35 AM
... it enjoys a level of enthusiasm from its worldwide users similar to that of Final Cut Pro ...

That's very good news. To me it seems obvious that Apple owners are going to stay with FCP. So the really interesting, from a news point of view, is what will PC users use for HDV and XDCAM HD. With the support of XDCAM HD (and the new JVC 200 and 250), I suspect Vegas is in a position to attract a different kind of customer. One with a much bigger budget. One who is very comfortable in the Avid world.

If there is one thing that Avid editors believe, it is that nothing "trims" like an Avid. And, despite my dislike of Avid's "modal" interface -- I believe they are 100% correct. And, they have a client list that proves it. To claim the top Hollywood and Post editors "just don't get it" is absurd. I've never even heard a pro FCP person make such a claim.

It's also a very poor marketing tactic -- one I really doubt Sony wants to follow.

Because I have used Vegas for years -- I asked the ONE question which would be asked by any high-end editor. I asked the question because I missed page 123 in the PDF.

As some may know I'm finishing a series on Avid Liquid. The open question is which PC NLE to cover next. Avid has announced XDCAM HD will ONLY be supported by Composer at $5,000. (Which means they see XDCAM HD as something only the high-end will use.)

Premiere Pro as part of Adobe Studio is THE obvious choice. However, it still has an issue with long HDV programs and I don't think XDCAM HD is yet fully supported. So that leaves Vegas.

I really wasn't interested in hearing opinions about Vegas or about what certain people thought of certain styles of editing. I simply wanted answers about HOW to do ALL forms of 3-point editing. << I still want to know how 4-point can be done! >>

Having figured-out a way to do all types of 3-point trims -- is a very positive step toward covering Vegas.

Vegas and Liquid have something in common -- the creation of 5.1 surround sound IN the NLE application. The difference is that Vegas allows the AC3 file to be exported while Liquid does not. Now if you are planning to burn high-definition DVDs that's a very big positive. And, since Sony's VAIO is ready to burn BD -- you can see the obvious connection between Vegas and VAIO. Especially when the BD burning software is $80.

Thank you to Chris for cleaning this thread up.

Bill Ravens
November 6th, 2006, 08:00 AM
FWIW....I've worked with one of the editors from The Sopranos, you may recall she won an emmy. She's used to working with Avid and was completely blown away when she saw me doing work on Vegas. Needless to say, I spent over 80 hrs working for her independent piece...and all on Vegas. The limitations were my own ignorance, not the capabilities of vegas.