View Full Version : Comparing HD-200 and HD-250
Dave Beaty October 10th, 2006, 05:33 AM I am looking at both of these cameras and I understand some of the enhancements over the HD-100 such as the 720p60 and gamma improvements as well as image flip and PL mount adaptor.
I know the HD-250 has studio options and comes with HD-SDI, BNC connectors and TC and Genlock inputs.
But what about the HD-200, does it have TC inputs and the better BNC output connectors?
That's the one pro feature we've been lacking. No way to sync two cameras in the field. I don't need the HD-SDI output (at least not on a camera, a deck is another matter).
Is it correct they don't come with a stock lens?
Dave Beaty
Carl Hicks October 10th, 2006, 06:44 AM I am looking at both of these cameras and I understand some of the enhancements over the HD-100 such as the 720p60 and gamma improvements as well as image flip and PL mount adaptor.
I know the HD-250 has studio options and comes with HD-SDI, BNC connectors and TC and Genlock inputs.
But what about the HD-200, does it have TC inputs and the better BNC output connectors?
That's the one pro feature we've been lacking. No way to sync two cameras in the field. I don't need the HD-SDI output (at least not on a camera, a deck is another matter).
Is it correct they don't come with a stock lens?
Dave Beaty
Dave, the final feature set of the GY-HD200 is still in flux. We should know for sure in about a month.
As far as lenses go, both new GY-HD250 and GY-HD200 will probably be available with the "stock" 16X HD lens, and without it, so you can choose another lens. There are now six different native 1/3" HD lenses on the market.
Regards, Carl
Jemore Santos October 10th, 2006, 07:06 AM Carl do you have details or a website about those different 1/3 lenses and also do you know if there will be an adapter for the PL mounts on the 100/1, 110/1 cameras?
Carl Hicks October 10th, 2006, 07:29 AM Carl do you have details or a website about those different 1/3 lenses and also do you know if there will be an adapter for the PL mounts on the 100/1, 110/1 cameras?
Jermone,
All ProHD cameras thus far use the same 1/3" bayonet. Therefore, any lens adaptor that is on the market or comes to market will fit all of the 100 series and 200 series cameras.
Here are the 1/3" lenses:
Fujinon - TH16X5.5BRM (the stock lens)
Fujinon - TH13x3.5BRMU
Fujinon - TH17X5BRMU
Fujinon - HTS18X4.2BRM
Fujinon - TH17X5BMD-DSD (for pan-tilt remote applications)
Canon - KT20x5BKRS (available in December)
Regards, Carl
William Hess October 10th, 2006, 09:46 AM I'm curious about the HTS18X4.2BRM. Does the HTS prefix indicate that this is a higher quality lens? I do see that it has Digipower and Quickzoom (which the TH does not) however I'm wondering if the optical quality is better then, say, the TH13x3.5BRMU.
Also, I could not find the HTS18X4.2BRM in stock anywhere (B&H doesn't even have it listed). Where would I purchase one?
Another thing I noticed is that the Fujinon website doesn't even list the TH13x3.5BRMU any more. Is this lens going away or being replaced soon?
Floris van Eck October 10th, 2006, 02:26 PM Carl, I am also really intested to learn more about these two camera's.
1. The HD-200 seems to be targeted at indie filmmakers. Is this right?
2. The camera's will have 720p/60 and 720p/50. So this will solve a much named flaw of the HD-100/HD-110... namely filming fast action?
3. Which lens comes with the HD-200?
4. Are there any changes with regards to the viewfinder and LCD screen compared to the HD-110?
5. Does it come with a battery? If so, which system?
6. Is the size of the HD-200 the same as the HD-110?
7. Will it be released this year? Or do we have to wait till 2007.
8. With 720p/60 and 720p/50, is the recording time on a tape still 60 min? Or is it shorter because of the new encoding techniques?
Thanks in advance for any answer you can give!
Carl Hicks October 10th, 2006, 09:37 PM I'm curious about the HTS18X4.2BRM. Does the HTS prefix indicate that this is a higher quality lens? I do see that it has Digipower and Quickzoom (which the TH does not) however I'm wondering if the optical quality is better then, say, the TH13x3.5BRMU.
Also, I could not find the HTS18X4.2BRM in stock anywhere (B&H doesn't even have it listed). Where would I purchase one?
Another thing I noticed is that the Fujinon website doesn't even list the TH13x3.5BRMU any more. Is this lens going away or being replaced soon?
Hi William,
Yes, the HTS18X4.2BRM will be a "higher-end" lens. I would not say however that it will be a "better" lens than the TH13X3.5BRMU, which is our top-end wide angle lens. The Canon lens will be less wide, and much longer, but still be of a similar quality as the TH13X3.5BRMU
As my post says, the Canon lens is not available until December. I would ask your LOCAL JVC Pro dealer to keep you in touch on this.
The Fujinon TH13X3.5BRMU is sold only through JVC Pro. Again, contact your LOCAL JVC Pro for pricing. It is a special order item, so you will probably not find it in stock anywhere. Typical delivery is 2 to 4 weeks.
Regards, Carl
Carl Hicks October 10th, 2006, 09:52 PM Carl, I am also really intested to learn more about these two camera's.
1. The HD-200 seems to be targeted at indie filmmakers. Is this right? That is exactly correct!
2. The camera's will have 720p/60 and 720p/50. So this will solve a much named flaw of the HD-100/HD-110... namely filming fast action? For most users of the HD100/110, this is not an issue, once they learn to limit pans to a reasonable speed much like you do with a film camera. We would not have been able to sell 15,000 plus cameras if this were a big issue. But for those who are doing fast action subjects, like sports or adventure/reality, then yes, the 50 and 60 fps rates will be a big benefit.
3. Which lens comes with the HD-200? This has not been finalized for sure yet, but one possibility is to offer it as a package with the 16X Fujinon HD lens, and also offer is with no lens so you can choose any lens you want.
4. Are there any changes with regards to the viewfinder and LCD screen compared to the HD-110? Not that I am aware of.
5. Does it come with a battery? If so, which system? The latest I heard is that the camera will ship with an IDX battery adaptor. Batteries and charger will be separate.
6. Is the size of the HD-200 the same as the HD-110? No, the body of the HD200 will be the same basic size as the GYHD250.
7. Will it be released this year? Or do we have to wait till 2007. Tentative release date is end of November of 2006. Final feature set is still a little in flux, so we don't know for sure.
8. With 720p/60 and 720p/50, is the recording time on a tape still 60 min? Or is it shorter because of the new encoding techniques? Still 60 minutes on a tape. The new Super Encoder yields twice as many frames, less noise, better color reproduction, and yet it still operates at the same 19.7 Mbps bit rate.
Thanks in advance for any answer you can give![/QUOTE]
Earl Thurston October 10th, 2006, 10:30 PM As my post says, the Canon lens is not available until December. I would ask your LOCAL JVC Pro dealer to keep you in touch on this.
NB: William was asking about the HTS18X4.2BRM.
Carl Hicks October 10th, 2006, 10:33 PM NB: William was asking about the HTS18X4.2BRM.
Correction: Canon KT20x5BKRS (available in December) is what I was referring to.
I have no information on the HTS18X4.2BRM.
Regards, Carl
Jemore Santos October 11th, 2006, 02:02 AM Carl sorry to confuse you but I want to know if there will be PL mount adapters for the older 100/110 series, I'm thinking about using primes on these cameras.
Floris van Eck October 11th, 2006, 02:12 AM Thanks for your anwers Carl! I am in the market for a new camera this year. And the HD200 is definately an option for me. Some questions left.
You mentioned that the HD200 will come with either a stock lens or without a lens so we can choose one yourselves. That would be great, but I suppose the $8000 price is for the bundle and the body-only would be cheaper? If so, it would truly show great flexibility and customer service from JVC!
The HD200 is the same size as the HD250. How does it compare to the HD110. Is it slightly larger/heavier or is it much bigger?
Finally. With the PAL model, I will have 720p/25 and 720p/50. That would mean I can shoot slow-motion sequences right?
Michael Maier October 11th, 2006, 04:14 AM Carl sorry to confuse you but I want to know if there will be PL mount adapters for the older 100/110 series, I'm thinking about using primes on these cameras.
Well I’m not Carl, but I know you can use the PL adapter with any ProHD 1/3" camera, so it will work with the HD100 and HD110 as well. But the catch is that the images will be recorded upside down, like when you use a M2 35mm DOF adapter. The HD200 and HD250 have a flip feature to correct that and allow for upright recording.
Michael Maier October 11th, 2006, 04:22 AM You mentioned that the HD200 will come with either a stock lens or without a lens so we can choose one yourselves. That would be great, but I suppose the $8000 price is for the bundle and the body-only would be cheaper?
I would guess the $8,000 is for the camera body only. It would be great if I’m wrong, of course.
The HD200 is the same size as the HD250. How does it compare to the HD110. Is it slightly larger/heavier or is it much bigger?
The HD250 is only longer in the back, to allow for the extra connectors. It also comes with a pro battery mount, which makes it even longer. So I would guess it’s also heavier, but not by much.
http://pro.jvc.com/prof/attributes/features.jsp?model_id=MDL101625
Finally. With the PAL model, I will have 720p/25 and 720p/50. That would mean I can shoot slow-motion sequences right?
Yes, that’s correct. But you can already do that with the HD100 using the HDV SD mode 576/50p. There’s a resolution drop naturally, but the slow motion effect is there.
Carl Hicks October 11th, 2006, 05:46 AM Carl sorry to confuse you but I want to know if there will be PL mount adapters for the older 100/110 series, I'm thinking about using primes on these cameras.
The PL adaptor will work on ANY JVC ProHD 3 CCD series camera.
In the case of the HD100 / 110, the image will be recorded flipped. So in your post production process, you would flip the image back to normal. Customers are already doing this with other lens adaptors that are on the market.
In the case of the new GY-HD200 or 250, the camera will flip the image for you prior to recording, thus saving time in post.
Regards, Carl
Carl Hicks October 11th, 2006, 05:58 AM Thanks for your anwers Carl! I am in the market for a new camera this year. And the HD200 is definately an option for me. Some questions left.
You mentioned that the HD200 will come with either a stock lens or without a lens so we can choose one yourselves. That would be great, but I suppose the $8000 price is for the bundle and the body-only would be cheaper? If so, it would truly show great flexibility and customer service from JVC!
The HD200 is the same size as the HD250. How does it compare to the HD110. Is it slightly larger/heavier or is it much bigger?
Finally. With the PAL model, I will have 720p/25 and 720p/50. That would mean I can shoot slow-motion sequences right?
Regarding price: Any pricing you may have seen thus far is preliminary. Final pricing has not been released yet, but should be very soon.
Regarding size: The 200/250 series cameras will be about 4 inches longer than the 100/110 series. This is comparing the 100/110 series body WITHOUT an after-market battery adaptor to a 200/250 series WITH the Anton Bauer adaptor. So if you compared both cameras, with AB battery adaptor, the difference would be maybe 2 inches or so.
Regarding weight: The 200/250 series camera head will be about 1 lb. heavier than the 100/110 series.
Regarding Frame Rates: Both the NTSC and PAL models will be able to shoot frame rates of 24,25,30,50, and 60 in the HD mode. So yes, you could "overcrank" by shooting at 50 fps and slow it down to 25 fps in post for example.
Remember that in the HD world, there is no "NTSC" or "PAL". HD standards are international. NTSC or PAL only applies to SD modes.
Regards, Carl
Paul Jefferies October 11th, 2006, 06:28 AM I think its great that people from inside the industry like Carl look at the posts and give responses - it helps to reinforce the fact that JVC are making a real effort to get the whole HDpro format right. However, as his replies are spread all over the various threads, is it time to start a seperate thread, called "Ask Carl" - where anyone who has a question like these can post, and Carl could give his responses, all in one place? Maybe once a week or something?
Michael Maier October 11th, 2006, 06:31 AM WOW! Sorry for trying to help. I was fully ignored big time!
David Ziegelheim October 11th, 2006, 08:03 AM Any chance of JVC adding an HDMI output. With the inexpensive BlackMagic HDMI card, it would provide a relatively inexpensive way (compared to HD-SDI) to get and capture uncompressed 4:2:2 video and uncompressed audio.
Jemore Santos October 11th, 2006, 08:27 AM Carl how much do the PL mount adapters cost? are they in the market?
Adam Letch October 12th, 2006, 11:25 PM Heres a link to videoguys in Aust, with the price for the CCU as well, they supply theirs with the standard Fujinon Lens, but why I don't know, they supply the BN-V428 battery, which is a mere 2800mAh. I don't have the hd100 in my hands at the moment, is that the stock battery, or is it the 3800mAh version the BN-V438U?
Anyways, here it is.
http://www.videoguys.com.au/scripts/prodList.asp?idcategory=321
Dave Beaty October 15th, 2006, 02:52 PM We are placing an order for 2 of the HD250's very soon. We are also going to use the DR-HD100 HDR now that we can use FCPro with the files.
My only concern is that with the Anton battery, the BNC connector section and the HDR on the back, this camera will be 3 feet long!
I hope I can balance it. At least it looks like the tripod plate now mounts on 2 points, is that correct?
Dave Beaty
Carl Hicks October 15th, 2006, 03:54 PM We are placing an order for 2 of the HD250's very soon. We are also going to use the DR-HD100 HDR now that we can use FCPro with the files.
My only concern is that with the Anton battery, the BNC connector section and the HDR on the back, this camera will be 3 feet long!
I hope I can balance it. At least it looks like the tripod plate now mounts on 2 points, is that correct?
Dave Beaty
Dave,
Yes, the GY-HD200 and GY-HD250 clamp onto the included tripod plate in the front and the back. These new cameras are only a couple of inches longer than the 100 series, when you include the battery bracket on both.
Carl
Jack Walker October 15th, 2006, 05:02 PM Regarding size: The 200/250 series cameras will be about 4 inches longer than the 100/110 series. This is comparing the 100/110 series body WITHOUT an after-market battery adaptor to a 200/250 series WITH the Anton Bauer adaptor. So if you compared both cameras, with AB battery adaptor, the difference would be maybe 2 inches or so.
Will the 200 and 250 with the wide angle lens still fit properly in the JVC case for the HD100?
Or is a new version of the case going to be available.
I am ordering the case, though I plan on upgrading within the near future to the HD200. Since the HD200 now has the larger body, I need to ask about the case.
Thank you!
Carl Hicks October 16th, 2006, 01:24 PM Will the 200 and 250 with the wide angle lens still fit properly in the JVC case for the HD100?
Or is a new version of the case going to be available.
I am ordering the case, though I plan on upgrading within the near future to the HD200. Since the HD200 now has the larger body, I need to ask about the case.
Thank you!
Jack, I have posed the question to product management and I await an answer.
Regards, Carl
Dave Beaty October 17th, 2006, 05:27 AM Yes, I too need to know about case options for the HD250 as we normally would order them with the camera. Since the size is different in length, that could be a problem with the current HD100 cases.
Also, I am working with my dealer and they are unsure about the battery system needed. Anton or IDX or adaptor like the HD100.
Any update on availablility or ship dates for HD250? Thanks
Dave Beaty
Daniel Patton October 17th, 2006, 09:13 PM Also, I am working with my dealer and they are unsure about the battery system needed. Anton or IDX or adaptor like the HD100.
Dave Beaty
Dave,
I was looking at the same thing the other day and found this...
"The built-in Anton-Bauer battery bracket provides compatibility with the most popular battery systems for ENG."
at:
http://pro.jvc.com/prof/attributes/press_res.jsp?model_id=MDL101625&feature_id=08
Unless JVC has changed this of course.
.
Carl Hicks October 17th, 2006, 10:12 PM Dave,
I was looking at the same thing the other day and found this...
"The built-in Anton-Bauer battery bracket provides compatibility with the most popular battery systems for ENG."
at:
http://pro.jvc.com/prof/attributes/press_res.jsp?model_id=MDL101625&feature_id=08
Unless JVC has changed this of course.
.
GY-HD250U is to ship with the Anton Bauer bracket standard. IDX will be available as an option.
Carl Hicks October 17th, 2006, 10:15 PM Yes, I too need to know about case options for the HD250 as we normally would order them with the camera. Since the size is different in length, that could be a problem with the current HD100 cases.
Also, I am working with my dealer and they are unsure about the battery system needed. Anton or IDX or adaptor like the HD100.
Any update on availablility or ship dates for HD250? Thanks
Dave Beaty
Jack & Dave,
It's likely that there will be a new model number for the case for the HD200 and HD250 cameras. I believe that the outer dimensions will be the same as the CB100, but the foam on the inside will be cut a little different.
Regards, Carl
Ken Hodson October 18th, 2006, 12:17 AM In regards to the "Super Encoder" that allows full 60p using the same 19.7mbps, does this super encode also work its magic on 24p and 30p? If they are able to double the frame rate with an apparent increase in quality, the older 24p and 30p modes should be just gorgeous! If they are left unchanged, then there is some sevear untapped potential there. Any chance they boosted the old 480p60 mode to 480p120?(that would be very cool, although unlikely)
Stephan Ahonen October 18th, 2006, 12:44 AM In regards to the "Super Encoder" that allows full 60p using the same 19.7mbps, does this super encode also work its magic on 24p and 30p? If they are able to double the frame rate with an apparent increase in quality, the older 24p and 30p modes should be just gorgeous! If they are left unchanged, then there is some sevear untapped potential there. Any chance they boosted the old 480p60 mode to 480p120?(that would be very cool, although unlikely)
The encoder's behavior on 24 and 30p material is unchanged, all that the new encoder adds is increased processing capabilities to handle the large amount of raw data that 720p60 presents.
480p120 won't happen because the chip scans at a constant 60Hz (except in 24p mode). Doubling the frame rate would require doubling the scanning rate of the chip, which would require a fundamental re-engineering of the chip and camera.
Carl Hicks October 18th, 2006, 06:00 AM In regards to the "Super Encoder" that allows full 60p using the same 19.7mbps, does this super encode also work its magic on 24p and 30p? If they are able to double the frame rate with an apparent increase in quality, the older 24p and 30p modes should be just gorgeous! If they are left unchanged, then there is some sevear untapped potential there. Any chance they boosted the old 480p60 mode to 480p120?(that would be very cool, although unlikely)
Hi Ken,
I believe that there is only one encoder in the camera, so the increased quality of the encoder, as well as the new 14 bit A/D should give benefit to all recording modes of the new cameras.
No to the 480p/120 mode.
Regards, Carl
Floris van Eck October 18th, 2006, 07:42 AM Carl, when do you expect more information on the GY-HD200? The camera's where slated for a release in October. This is most likely not going to happen. So what's the current release frame? Are there updated details on the pricing for the models... with or without a stock lens? And what is the cost of the stocklens of the HD-110 when bought seperately?
I will be buying a camera between now and the end of december. So if the JVC's will arrive in that timeframe, they are a serious option for me. But without any new information, this is a bit difficult.
Carl Hicks October 18th, 2006, 09:28 PM Hi Floris,
Sorry, I don't have any specific information yet on the GY-HD200 release, but we should probably know in a few weeks.
I believe that you will be able to buy it with a stock 16X lens, and without a lens. Final pricing has not been set yet. The April press release shows an estimated price of about $8,000 list price.
I understand your need, and I will forward your questions to product management.
Regards, Carl
Floris van Eck October 18th, 2006, 11:37 PM I also understand that your company has a different schedule then me! I just hope that the information will be there before I make my purchase.
I think you already told me that you don't know, but is the estimated release price of $8000 with or without a stocklens (I think you mentioned without).
Carl Hicks October 18th, 2006, 11:45 PM I'm going to be conserative and say without lens. By comparison, the price on the GY-HD250U is $9995, without lens.
Regards, Carl
Floris van Eck October 18th, 2006, 11:46 PM What is the price of the lens that comes with the HD-110/111?
Carl Hicks October 18th, 2006, 11:54 PM It's not available from sales as a separate item. But, it can be ordered thru the parts department, as follows:
Part #LW30610-001B LENS - FUJINON LENS $2,208.07
Floris van Eck October 18th, 2006, 11:56 PM But I understand that there will be a lenskit as well?
Carl Hicks October 19th, 2006, 06:58 AM A good chance of that.
Paulo Teixeira October 19th, 2006, 03:42 PM Press Release
http://news.ecoustics.com/bbs/messages/10381/280056.html
Stephan Ahonen October 19th, 2006, 04:43 PM I've got a question here... Will it be possible to operate the camera handheld when it's hooked up to multicore for CCU control?
Carl Hicks October 19th, 2006, 09:51 PM I've got a question here... Will it be possible to operate the camera handheld when it's hooked up to multicore for CCU control?
Hi Stephen,
In order to connect the rack-mount CCU, RM-P210U, to the GY-HD250U, you have to use the KA-HD250U Studio Adaptor. This, of course, converts the camera into a full studio-type camera, designed to be tripod mounted. See our website and the brochure for details on the KA-HD250U. http://pro.jvc.com/prof/attributes/color_broch.jsp?model_id=MDL101625&feature_id=12
However, there are two solutions that are in the works that will allow shoulder-mount operation, with CCU control. One is from Telecast Fiber, and one is from Camplex. Details on these solutions will be coming later.
Regards, Carl
Stephan Ahonen October 20th, 2006, 12:02 AM Reason I'm asking is I work at a cable station that's looking to go HD in a couple years, we cover high school sports. The HD250 looks like a great solution to go HD very inexpensively, especially since the cameras can be used for ENG as well. TBH I wasn't too keen on multicore in the first place, if it were possible to run an HD250 over fiber or triax I would be sold. Triax preferably, since state tournaments happen in arenas that are wired for triax.
Also, a friend of mine runs a video program for a school district and he's looking to update his nearly decade-old video system as well, if he could get some proper CCU-controllable cameras (HD no less) for $15k each he would be all over it.
But... the big issue is being able to work with these cameras effectively handheld, which means for example being able to take the camera all the way up and down a football sideline.
Floris van Eck October 22nd, 2006, 02:28 AM Carl, what is the current status of the two camera's? I see different releasedates at each different site. Some say the HD-251E will be released early 2007 and the HD-201E will be released in october. But from what you have said, I understand that this is not the case?
Also, has your company already decided if the 200 will have IDX or AB? I am almost convinced to buy into the JVC system. Another question I have is if both camera's work easily with Adobe Production Studio (Premiere) as that is the NLE system I am using and am comfortable with.
Marc Jayson October 22nd, 2006, 03:52 AM Carl, what is the current status of the two camera's? I see different releasedates at each different site. Some say the HD-251E will be released early 2007 and the HD-201E will be released in october. But from what you have said, I understand that this is not the case?
Also, has your company already decided if the 200 will have IDX or AB? I am almost convinced to buy into the JVC system. Another question I have is if both camera's work easily with Adobe Production Studio (Premiere) as that is the NLE system I am using and am comfortable with.
This is the reply (10-10-2006) that I got from JVC Pro in The Netherlands:
Dear Mr/Mrs,
The GY-HD251 will be available as of the coming month.
For more information please contact Inter VCD Duiven
026-3196969 Mr. Geert-Jan van der Mark.
The GY-HD200 is officially announced, according to company policy
we can not inform the market until the product is officially released.
In order to have you fully informed,
--
Best regards/Met vriendelijke groet,
Paul H.A.G. Pasveer
.
.
.
JVC Professional Europe
Sales & Marketing Manager
-----------------------------
De Heyderweg 2-4
2314 XZ Leiden
THE NETHERLANDS
-----------------------------
Tel: +31 (0)71 - 545.33.22
Fax: +31 (0)71 - 545.34.05
Mob: +31 (0)6 - 525.55.103
-----------------------------
Carl Hicks October 22nd, 2006, 06:57 PM Reason I'm asking is I work at a cable station that's looking to go HD in a couple years, we cover high school sports. The HD250 looks like a great solution to go HD very inexpensively, especially since the cameras can be used for ENG as well. TBH I wasn't too keen on multicore in the first place, if it were possible to run an HD250 over fiber or triax I would be sold. Triax preferably, since state tournaments happen in arenas that are wired for triax.
Also, a friend of mine runs a video program for a school district and he's looking to update his nearly decade-old video system as well, if he could get some proper CCU-controllable cameras (HD no less) for $15k each he would be all over it.
But... the big issue is being able to work with these cameras effectively handheld, which means for example being able to take the camera all the way up and down a football sideline.
Hi Stephan,
JVC is working with two companies to finalize long-distance cable solutions for the GY-HD250U. One is Telecast Fiber, and one is Camplex. Both systems will allow remote control, powering, and signals over cable that is a combination of either fiber and a copper pair, or fiber and a coax.
I saw the Camplex prototype last week with a GY-HD250, and it was quite impressive. It's base station will output a composite SD video signal and a HD-SDI HD signal from the camera. The system powers the camera, and in conjunction with a small JVC remote, full CCU control is provided. Intercom & genlock are also sent down the coax. Cabling is fiber for the HD, and coax for all other signals and power. The fiber and the coax are bundled together in a single jacket. The cable is flexible, durable, and lighter weight than triax or multicore. The coax portion of the cable assembly can be tied into a traix facility with a coax to traix adaptor that Camplex sells, but an extra fiber cable would need to be run for the HD-SDI. You might be able to do SD-SDI over the triax alone. Cable lenths up to about 1400 feet are possible. This system would work well in your football application.
The Telecast Fiber system will be more feature-rich, and will accomodate cable lengths up to about 5000 meters. Of course, it will cost more. I have not seen it yet in operation, so I can't comment on it's qualities yet, but it should be top-notch.
With these options, we will be able to cover virtually any studio or EFP application, with 3 different alternatives for cabling and control.
Regards, Carl
Carl Hicks October 22nd, 2006, 07:08 PM Carl, what is the current status of the two camera's? I see different releasedates at each different site. Some say the HD-251E will be released early 2007 and the HD-201E will be released in october. But from what you have said, I understand that this is not the case?
Also, has your company already decided if the 200 will have IDX or AB? I am almost convinced to buy into the JVC system. Another question I have is if both camera's work easily with Adobe Production Studio (Premiere) as that is the NLE system I am using and am comfortable with.
Hi Floris,
I can only speak for what's happening in the US. We expect to have a small amount of GY-HD250U's in the U.S. in a few weeks. Orders are already in-hand for many units.
Regarding the GY-HD200U: We have always said that it would come sometime after the GY-HD250U. I don't know the exact time, but in the near future.
The U.S. GY-HD250U will have an Anton Bauer battery mount standard. I do not know about models for other parts of the world.
Tentative information for the GY-HD200U is that it will likely have an IDX mount.
Regarding Adobe Premier: The GY-HD100U and GY-HD110U work fine with Premier. The new cameras should work equally as well. In fact, Adobe Premier was one of the very first NLE's to fully support JVC's ProHD equipment.
Regards, Carl
|
|