Mark Silva
September 12th, 2006, 11:47 AM
I just got back some tapes from a shoot last weekend.
They are interviews.
2 tapes are barely audible and don't register at all on the vu meter.
I have to crank it way up through a mixer to be able to tell what the guy is saying. both were shot in different locations.
one of the tapes is perfectly fine (interviewing a woman in a different location)
all the tapes have bars and tone at the head, and the tone sounds perfectly fine.
Now what does not make any sense, is that the audio guy and the camera shooter are all veterans with decades of experience in film and video production.
They were monitoring EVERYTHING through the JVC camera. and it all sounded perfect when they were shooting.
Has anyone else run into this? Is it possible for the HD100-U to monitor the audio perfectly but record something barely audible to tape?
The sound guy didn't know if the VU meter was on the viewfinder or not.
They are interviews.
2 tapes are barely audible and don't register at all on the vu meter.
I have to crank it way up through a mixer to be able to tell what the guy is saying. both were shot in different locations.
one of the tapes is perfectly fine (interviewing a woman in a different location)
all the tapes have bars and tone at the head, and the tone sounds perfectly fine.
Now what does not make any sense, is that the audio guy and the camera shooter are all veterans with decades of experience in film and video production.
They were monitoring EVERYTHING through the JVC camera. and it all sounded perfect when they were shooting.
Has anyone else run into this? Is it possible for the HD100-U to monitor the audio perfectly but record something barely audible to tape?
The sound guy didn't know if the VU meter was on the viewfinder or not.