Guest
March 7th, 2003, 03:27 PM
Yesterday I was shooting news footage at the scene of a fatal avalanche. It was at 12,000 feet elevation and colder than a... well, it was cold. Though it was mostly sunny, the wind was blowing at about 40-knots and clouds passed overhead like fluffy race cars. I had to keep my thumb on the iris wheel to make constant changes. It was not snowing, but the wind was blowing so many tiny specs of snow it was like being in a frozen shower.
The biggest problem I had was my EVF. Almost as soon as I'd put my eye to it, it fogged up. So I tried to center my shots and keep other than primary stuff out of the foreground, and held the autofocus button in... hoping for the best. Luckily, that worked and I got some terriffic footage.
I did notice, however, when I could see through the EVF the image appeared to be much darker than normal. Fortunately, I trusted my gut and shot at the exposure I thought best. If I'd have shot using the EVF to give me an indication of what I was getting, I'd have gotten a bunch of worthless stuff.
So after this winded diatribe, the question is: Was it just me, or does the EVF react to damp cold and not reflect images accurately?
The biggest problem I had was my EVF. Almost as soon as I'd put my eye to it, it fogged up. So I tried to center my shots and keep other than primary stuff out of the foreground, and held the autofocus button in... hoping for the best. Luckily, that worked and I got some terriffic footage.
I did notice, however, when I could see through the EVF the image appeared to be much darker than normal. Fortunately, I trusted my gut and shot at the exposure I thought best. If I'd have shot using the EVF to give me an indication of what I was getting, I'd have gotten a bunch of worthless stuff.
So after this winded diatribe, the question is: Was it just me, or does the EVF react to damp cold and not reflect images accurately?