Stephen Pruitt
August 22nd, 2006, 07:31 AM
Hi all. . .
Here are two probably incredibly dumb questions about the HVX200, but I guess unless I ask, I'll never know.
1. How can something be both progressive AND interlaced at very same time? That is, the HVX200 records in 1080i/24P! This makes no sense to me. It seems that it should either be interlaced OR progressive, but not both. Or am I really missing something?
2. Finally, EXCEPT for storage issues, is there ANY visual difference between recording in 720/24pN and recording in 720/60 and then pulling it down to 24p? It would seem to me that the less processing one uses, the better things out to look, but, again, I may be missing something.
Thanks so much.
Stephen
Here are two probably incredibly dumb questions about the HVX200, but I guess unless I ask, I'll never know.
1. How can something be both progressive AND interlaced at very same time? That is, the HVX200 records in 1080i/24P! This makes no sense to me. It seems that it should either be interlaced OR progressive, but not both. Or am I really missing something?
2. Finally, EXCEPT for storage issues, is there ANY visual difference between recording in 720/24pN and recording in 720/60 and then pulling it down to 24p? It would seem to me that the less processing one uses, the better things out to look, but, again, I may be missing something.
Thanks so much.
Stephen