Didi Schoeman
August 10th, 2006, 02:02 PM
Two days ago things went horribly wrong on a wildlife shoot in Zambia and my trusted XL1s died a horrible death...
I'm now faced with replacing the camera and have to make a choice between the XLH1 and Sony HVR-Z1U... the Sony is half the price and most production companies in South Africa seem to prefer them, but I'm still leaning towards the Canon, even though it means I have to fork out a hell of a lot more... any thoughts on that, which is the better camera or is that a stupid question???
Of course to top things off, Murphy had to get his little punch in there too... Two weeks ago I bought over $500 worth of battery chargers, batteries, wide angle lens adapters etc. Does the XLH1 use the same batteries as the XL1s???
Any advice or opinions are welcome. I make television documentaries for a living, mostly wildlife documentaries that are shot off the cuff. I typically track animals for up to 10 miles on foot, so there's no ways I can hook up external drives etc.
Editing is done on FCP and then exported back onto tape, normally Digi-Beta. Upgrading to HD is a natural next step, in fact it's long overdue...
I use the Canon for various reasons:
1) It handles like the larger Professional Cameras, yet is light enough to carry over long distances.
2) It has one hell of a lens stabilizer for hand held shots, unlike any I've seen on any camera!!!
3) Obviously the ability to interchange lenses.
4) Affordability, hell my next choice comes in at a 100K!
5) Above all, the fact that I've been able to get away with it. I've had no complaints from broadcasters who have accepted my SD footage from my XL1s as if it was shot on DVCAM... I suppose I somehow hope to achieve the same with the HD footage...
I'm now faced with replacing the camera and have to make a choice between the XLH1 and Sony HVR-Z1U... the Sony is half the price and most production companies in South Africa seem to prefer them, but I'm still leaning towards the Canon, even though it means I have to fork out a hell of a lot more... any thoughts on that, which is the better camera or is that a stupid question???
Of course to top things off, Murphy had to get his little punch in there too... Two weeks ago I bought over $500 worth of battery chargers, batteries, wide angle lens adapters etc. Does the XLH1 use the same batteries as the XL1s???
Any advice or opinions are welcome. I make television documentaries for a living, mostly wildlife documentaries that are shot off the cuff. I typically track animals for up to 10 miles on foot, so there's no ways I can hook up external drives etc.
Editing is done on FCP and then exported back onto tape, normally Digi-Beta. Upgrading to HD is a natural next step, in fact it's long overdue...
I use the Canon for various reasons:
1) It handles like the larger Professional Cameras, yet is light enough to carry over long distances.
2) It has one hell of a lens stabilizer for hand held shots, unlike any I've seen on any camera!!!
3) Obviously the ability to interchange lenses.
4) Affordability, hell my next choice comes in at a 100K!
5) Above all, the fact that I've been able to get away with it. I've had no complaints from broadcasters who have accepted my SD footage from my XL1s as if it was shot on DVCAM... I suppose I somehow hope to achieve the same with the HD footage...