Robert Kirkpatrick
August 8th, 2006, 08:33 AM
I was hoping to do more tests with the SGPro with my FX1 and my work’s Z1U, but with the crazy heat and humidity, I didn’t want to take the cameras outside. (I’ve ruined enough cameras already in August weather.) What I have is my first initial test with the FX1 and the SGPro. I figure I should just post what I’ve got so far. I’ll try to update as soon as I do more tests.
Here’s a link to the footage (about 44 mb, please right-click and save as): http://www.crowfeatherfilms.com/dv/sgpro-quicktest.mov
These are my quick initial observations:
1. The SGPro rocks. Truly does. Very easy to set up and install without instructions. For the FX1, you essentially remove the hood and put the lens adapter as close to the FX1 lens as possible. Then zoom in with the FX1. The 35mm lenses need to be opened to the maximum iris setting. I found that I had to focus using the 35mm lens, the FX1, or a combination of the two, depending on the situation. It’s not frustrating in the least, and surprisingly easy to get used to. With practice and careful marking of the focus rings, I could do some nice follow focus shots.
2. The SGPro adds some heft to the overall weight of the camera, but I was still able to hoist it about on my jury-rigged fig rig. It looks incredibly pro and impressive, and there’s none of that homemade look of the original SG unit. I’m glad I waited for the Pro over the regular SG.
3. For the FX1 and the Z1U, you can see the black frames of the 35mm guide. In post, I had to crop about 5% to get rid of the black frames. (The posted footage already has the black frames cropped off.) I spoke to Wayne via email (who, by the way, is incredibly helpful and friendly), and he gave me clear instructions on removing the 35mm guide from the unit. It’s easy to do, but you have to be careful and use a thin knife to peel off the guide. Because of the weather, I haven’t had a chance to test out the SGPro without the 35mm guide, but I can’t imagine it would be any different.
4. If you’re not used to using a 35mm adapter (which I wasn’t), you’ll be surprised by how more limited your shot selections are, based on what lens you’re using. With standard video, you can usually move the camera anywhere. With the 35mm adapter, you have to be more selective about where you put the camera, based on what lenses are screwed on. But with the more lenses, you have more options in shot composition and can play with the mood and tone better. This is just a different way of shooting than what I’m used to, but I thought I’d mention it for those that think a 35mm adapter will instantly turn them into Steven Spielberg.
Observations regarding the quick test footage:
1. If you notice, there is some flicker on a few of the shots. I’m not sure if this is due to the SGPro’s spinning disk, or the fact that I shot in Cineframe 24 mode and converted using Cineform. My hunch is that it’s the 24 mode, but I hope to do more tests using standard 60i. It’s not from the Quicktime compression, because I see it on the Sony Vegas timeline while I’m editing.
2. My Nikon lenses are some the cheapest around, so please don’t judge the SGPro based on my lens choice. There's a definite loss of sharpness with these cheaper lenses. The Quicktime compression also doesn’t do the footage justice, because everything still looks awesome on the test DVD I made.
3. As you can see from the footage, I was testing out sharpness levels of the Cineframe 24 mode of the Sony FX1. So some of the footage is not as sharp as others – and I think there may be some resolution loss from the 24 mode. With all the test shots, I tried to include all the camera settings, so you could get an idea of how each shot was made.
4. My wife would kill me if she knew I shared her video image with everyone. So, shhhh, everyone.
Overall, I’m very happy with my purchase of the SGPro. If you guys have any questions, just let me know, since I know this post is kinda rushed. Also, I don’t know how long I’ll have this footage up, so please grab it while you can. (And Wayne, if you read this, feel free to host the footage elsewhere if you like – that is, if you need it.)
Here’s a link to the footage (about 44 mb, please right-click and save as): http://www.crowfeatherfilms.com/dv/sgpro-quicktest.mov
These are my quick initial observations:
1. The SGPro rocks. Truly does. Very easy to set up and install without instructions. For the FX1, you essentially remove the hood and put the lens adapter as close to the FX1 lens as possible. Then zoom in with the FX1. The 35mm lenses need to be opened to the maximum iris setting. I found that I had to focus using the 35mm lens, the FX1, or a combination of the two, depending on the situation. It’s not frustrating in the least, and surprisingly easy to get used to. With practice and careful marking of the focus rings, I could do some nice follow focus shots.
2. The SGPro adds some heft to the overall weight of the camera, but I was still able to hoist it about on my jury-rigged fig rig. It looks incredibly pro and impressive, and there’s none of that homemade look of the original SG unit. I’m glad I waited for the Pro over the regular SG.
3. For the FX1 and the Z1U, you can see the black frames of the 35mm guide. In post, I had to crop about 5% to get rid of the black frames. (The posted footage already has the black frames cropped off.) I spoke to Wayne via email (who, by the way, is incredibly helpful and friendly), and he gave me clear instructions on removing the 35mm guide from the unit. It’s easy to do, but you have to be careful and use a thin knife to peel off the guide. Because of the weather, I haven’t had a chance to test out the SGPro without the 35mm guide, but I can’t imagine it would be any different.
4. If you’re not used to using a 35mm adapter (which I wasn’t), you’ll be surprised by how more limited your shot selections are, based on what lens you’re using. With standard video, you can usually move the camera anywhere. With the 35mm adapter, you have to be more selective about where you put the camera, based on what lenses are screwed on. But with the more lenses, you have more options in shot composition and can play with the mood and tone better. This is just a different way of shooting than what I’m used to, but I thought I’d mention it for those that think a 35mm adapter will instantly turn them into Steven Spielberg.
Observations regarding the quick test footage:
1. If you notice, there is some flicker on a few of the shots. I’m not sure if this is due to the SGPro’s spinning disk, or the fact that I shot in Cineframe 24 mode and converted using Cineform. My hunch is that it’s the 24 mode, but I hope to do more tests using standard 60i. It’s not from the Quicktime compression, because I see it on the Sony Vegas timeline while I’m editing.
2. My Nikon lenses are some the cheapest around, so please don’t judge the SGPro based on my lens choice. There's a definite loss of sharpness with these cheaper lenses. The Quicktime compression also doesn’t do the footage justice, because everything still looks awesome on the test DVD I made.
3. As you can see from the footage, I was testing out sharpness levels of the Cineframe 24 mode of the Sony FX1. So some of the footage is not as sharp as others – and I think there may be some resolution loss from the 24 mode. With all the test shots, I tried to include all the camera settings, so you could get an idea of how each shot was made.
4. My wife would kill me if she knew I shared her video image with everyone. So, shhhh, everyone.
Overall, I’m very happy with my purchase of the SGPro. If you guys have any questions, just let me know, since I know this post is kinda rushed. Also, I don’t know how long I’ll have this footage up, so please grab it while you can. (And Wayne, if you read this, feel free to host the footage elsewhere if you like – that is, if you need it.)