Dee Joslin
June 1st, 2006, 07:03 PM
My experience has been with Canon XL1-s, XL2, JVC hd10u, Sony FX-1. Recently, I've been editing Sony HDV and cranking out HDDVD on the Toshiba unit. I've filmed in Alaska and Disney and I thought my HDV looked pretty good. Certainly leaps and bounds above "most" DV.
But when I saw the specs of the HVX200 and some of the sample video, I knew I had to have this camera. Sure I looked at the Canon H1. Great machine. but it came down to the formats, the bandwidth, and recording options. The Canon is like in another price bracket anyway with all the add ons. But 100mbps, 4:2:2 sampling and a FCP friendly format was very tantalizing after dealing with HDV. I've seen both sides of the fence and it's not just about resolution. The bottom line is the quality of the video and I for one am impressed with the HVX200. So much so that I just sold my FX-1, Canon 20d, and my dual 1.8 mac. I;m upgrading to a quad core mac and just ordered my HVX200 and FS-100. I dhould have it all within 2 weeks and I can't wait.
But when I saw the specs of the HVX200 and some of the sample video, I knew I had to have this camera. Sure I looked at the Canon H1. Great machine. but it came down to the formats, the bandwidth, and recording options. The Canon is like in another price bracket anyway with all the add ons. But 100mbps, 4:2:2 sampling and a FCP friendly format was very tantalizing after dealing with HDV. I've seen both sides of the fence and it's not just about resolution. The bottom line is the quality of the video and I for one am impressed with the HVX200. So much so that I just sold my FX-1, Canon 20d, and my dual 1.8 mac. I;m upgrading to a quad core mac and just ordered my HVX200 and FS-100. I dhould have it all within 2 weeks and I can't wait.