View Full Version : any firmware ?
Manu Paty June 1st, 2006, 06:47 PM first of all, i apologize for my next poor english...!! i've done many visits on the site to read reviews, comments and download your samples & footage. I think i've understood how to consider the HD1 now.
i know why i could buy it or not, and for what to do.
i saw an update of C1's firmware. Obviously, major part of you here probably don't need this because of manual parameters...
wouldn't it be possible to ask sanyo an update to fix problems, and make interesting the "auto" mode? just to make the sanyo easier to use, and more efficient...
i know brands can accept lists of bugs, problems, from many customers : qtek, Cowon (iaudio) do this easily.
i have a last question : i actually record with a JVC GRD200E dv cam (1,33p). Can someone could confirm me the HD1 would shot better...?stills & videos...!!
thank u again
Graham Jones June 3rd, 2006, 09:49 AM Cowon make the some of the best portable media players in the world - while Sanyo aren't at the top of the video camera game at all.
But it will be interesting to see whether there is a firmware upgrade - and whether the camera's limitations can be resolved through firmware anyway.
Manu Paty June 4th, 2006, 02:03 AM Cowon make the some of the best portable media players in the world - while Sanyo aren't at the top of the video camera game at all
i know i got the A2 pmp!! nearly all-day updated !! lol
i think sanyo won't do it if it's not asked (as u said their not at the top of camera brands)
Graham you got the HD1 i suppose? Are the video quality far from a middle class DV corder? I 've difficulty to compare. It is easier to compare with better HD camcorders, but that's not what i want.
Graham Jones June 4th, 2006, 08:57 AM It's neither like a middle class DV corder or a HDV device.
Reminds me more of a Super 8 camera, actually, because it's extremely limited yet capable of creating shockingly beautiful images in certain conditions.
Manu Paty June 5th, 2006, 03:04 AM yeah i understand. Choice is not easy. My dv camcorder don't do nice movies...but if i change, maybe i should wait sony hdd or HC1-HC3 being cheaper.
thanks
Leigh Kinch June 5th, 2006, 06:21 AM But the reason i want an HD1 is coz i can get it for under £400.
Its small light, doesnt use tapes and produces good video. Ok not amazing quality, but for £400 what do you expect?
SO im hoping for a firmware update before i make the purchase.
Manu Paty June 5th, 2006, 12:55 PM exactly, my first reason to buy is its cost...on eastbay, i can get it fo 600€ (HD1+extra battery+4GB SD). I just have to sell my previous DV corder.
Any guys to send a common mail to Sanyo asking a firmware?
Carlos Serrano June 5th, 2006, 04:39 PM Hi! I e-mailed Sanyo Spain reporting the bug and asking for a firmware. They contacted Sanyo Japan and are waiting for the answer. I attached this image to explain the problem: http://www.i-real3d.com/Archivos/HD1Bug.jpg
I think that Sanyo will develope a firmware if a lot users demands it. The common mail is also a good idea.
Bye!
Manu Paty June 6th, 2006, 08:22 AM thanks for your post Carlos, i had not already seen the bug on the pixels. Your picture joined is a good idea.
I'm gonna ty to email SanyoFrance too, i suppose you agree i use your picture with it.
if someone is ok to do a common mail, we could make a list of bugs and email it to sanyo.
Knwon bugs:
- split screen bug?
- stabilization OFF mode needed
- poor quality in dark environment
- diagonal pixels
- ......??
Carlos Serrano June 7th, 2006, 06:40 AM BAD NEWS. Sanyo WILL NOT release any Firmware for this camera. They know the bug, and they will correct it in the next models (HD2?), but not in the HD1.
Here is the answer from Sanyo Spain (in spanish):
"Disponemos de una contestación desde Japón sobre este asunto y la respuesta no es positiva. Reconocen el error en la cámara pero no se va a crear una actualización de Firmware para mejorarlo. Solamente en posteriores modelos se corregirá.
Lógicamente no estará usted satisfecho con la respuesta y lo comprendemos, por ello le invitamos a que devuelva el producto a la tienda donde lo compro y solicite el reembolso del importe.
Atentamente, un saludo."
I hope you understand my translation:
"We have an answer from Japan about this point and the answer is not positive. They recognize the camera´s error but an actualized firmware will not be created to solve it. Only will be corrected in next models.
Logically, you will not be happy with the answer and we understand it, for this, we invite you to return the product to the shop were you bought it and request the refund of the money.
Attentivly, greetings."
:-(
Massive mails to Sanyo Japan!!!
Manu Paty June 7th, 2006, 07:23 AM i sent an email to sanyo france, i think it's sanyo europe. Waiting for their answer but it will probably be the same as you got.
Massive mail to sanyo japan s a good idea :-)
HD2 ??? no previews on this?!!!
Daniel Steven June 8th, 2006, 01:57 PM Maybe there should be a recall then of this camera. If they are unwilling to fix it in a firmware release, I think it's a big enough bug to warrant recalling the cameras.
Chris Wells June 8th, 2006, 10:46 PM I'll stay with my HD1, even if they don't fix the firmware. But when I replace the unit, my new one won't be a Sanyo. If they won't release a firmware update for such apparent flaws, they don't deserve my future business. As I see it, the issue is one of honour. I'm very surprised that the Japanese, with face and honour so strong in their culture, would consider it acceptable to leave such a flaw in their units. The answer is a discrace. And even with honour aside, do they not realize that it's us early adopters that create the stable base that masses move on? Their choice is hardly strategic.
Euisung Lee June 9th, 2006, 12:33 AM BAD NEWS. Sanyo WILL NOT release any Firmware for this camera. They know the bug, and they will correct it in the next models (HD2?), but not in the HD1.
This is indeed a bad news. It must mean that HD1 didn't make enough buzz and the user base is small enough to ignore. How else would sanyo say it so blatantly? It is very unprofessional, and quite cooperation-like of sanyo.
How can we make this into a bad publicity for sanyo? Anybody care to start a petition?
Wayne Morellini June 10th, 2006, 09:43 AM They won't put out an firmware update, they should at least fix it up straight away for all the new batches coming off the assembly line.
With all the existing performance glitches, and problems reported with this camera lately, it's existing doesn't deserve a good name. Screens that go off, and fall off, I think I heard that one, is just incredible.
It would have been great, if Sanyo deserved a medal for the performance or the quality.
You are right, people need to email and complain.
Carlos, maybe you could ask them when the next model is coming? After all that, you can email them again and tell them that you are advising everybody to do as they said, and return their Sanyo cameras for a refund, or not buy them, that should interest them. Maybe users can't do the upgrade, or the bug is hardwired into the encoder chips, and can't be changed until the present batch of chips runs out.
Wayne Morellini June 10th, 2006, 10:11 AM I am here to post a thread about the possibility of changing the recorded files around to correct the bug. Maybe you could email them and ask them if the bug is before or after the compression stages, and how much it effects the compression, explained in definite technical terms of where it is in the process. If the bug is after compression, or doesn't effect compression at all, then a simple conversion program can change footage (as the bug should definitely effect the quality of trans-coding without it). It also means that it would be possible for all mpeg4 editing/trans-coding programs to recognise and change it around.
Re-edit:
Here it is:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?p=495645#post495645
Calin Brabandt June 10th, 2006, 12:52 PM BAD NEWS. Sanyo WILL NOT release any Firmware for this camera.
This is outrageous! I purchased a legit (not gray market) HD-1 knowing about the diagonal line jaggies, which I find objectionable. Given that most digital cameras on the market today are updated with bug fixes, I trusted Sanyo to fix this bug and I did a "risk purchase" of the HD-1. If Sanyo doesn't fix our HD-1 cams, I won't be buying their products again.
Massive mails to Sanyo Japan!!!
Yes!
Calin Brabandt June 10th, 2006, 04:29 PM I posted on this issue over at Steve's Digicams. It seems Sanyo is considering a program to enable HD-1 owners to update their firmware, though no specific bugfixes are yet available or announced.
I suggest that we write to Sanyo and request this plan be implemented and also request bugfixes for whatever problems you feel need to be addressed. For me, it's the jaggies! Personally, I think we should also mention that PC-based updates are preferable to sending the cams to a service center.
Send comments to:
SANYO FisherCompany
Attn: Service�Manager, Xacti products
21605 Plummer�StreetChatsworth, CA 91311
(Address provided by Steve's Digicams forum member and Sanyo representative.)
Martin Earnshaw June 10th, 2006, 05:18 PM Does anyone have an email for customer support for Sanyo Japan?
Also as a user of the HD1 I would like to send my concerns re this product.
Wayne Morellini June 11th, 2006, 01:30 AM I posted on this issue over at Steve's Digicams. It seems Sanyo is considering a program to enable HD-1 owners to update their firmware, though no specific bugfixes are yet available or announced.
Have you got a link to the Steve Digicams thread?
Don't forget problems with stepping in the auto functions and the other manual problems, and shadow and sky clipping. Maybe you could also mention some suggested improvements I mentioned on the other thread, like different low light/latitude binning, upping the data rate to whatever they can get (where ever it's 13 or 19 it all helps) and the other suggestions. (I hope Sanyo can redeem themselves).
Wayne Morellini June 11th, 2006, 02:21 PM Found it, and I posted a summary of suggestions and problems over there for the Sanyo rep to forward on. Even if he does, it would be good to send your own, as they are more likely to listen to numbers.
Here it is:
http://www.stevesforums.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=85196&forum_id=27&jump_to=542165#p542165
I suggest we leave him in peace over there now.
John Carlson June 11th, 2006, 08:58 PM http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=69301
I wonder if the above qualifies as a bug. I am still rather curious. Either no one else notices them yet due to the way I test my camera for defects or my hd1 must be defected
Wayne Morellini June 12th, 2006, 12:36 AM I don't know, but I put a link to your thread in that post at stevesdigicam as one of the proofs.
If the noise is individual pixels speckled the wrong colour, it could be gain noise problem causing problems with the debayering, but having not seen it, I can't say.
John Carlson June 12th, 2006, 12:51 AM Nope I am not concern about the noise color. I am more concern with how it is concentrated in some specific areas forming vertical lines
John Carlson June 12th, 2006, 12:59 AM I don't know, but I put a link to your thread in that post at stevesdigicam as one of the proofs.
If the noise is individual pixels speckled the wrong colour, it could be gain noise problem causing problems with the debayering, but having not seen it, I can't say.
Hi, You did put a link? I am sorry but i don't see any replies so far. Perhaps you could point out exactly which thread you are refering to. Thanks
Wayne Morellini June 12th, 2006, 01:30 AM To your bug thread (please note, that for some reason links to the same thread might have different formats).
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=69301
It is hard to see your bug problem, maybe you should post a frame over there. It could be the same problem I described, as the gain pushes up the noise and it spikes across a column of pixels, but it could be something else entirely. If it is from bright light in the picture then it is more likely what I said, otherwise it might more likely be something else causing the lines.
If it is blooming causing the streaks and common to all these cameras, then it is just related to the level of sensor technology. Good sensors have anti-blooming circuits to suppress this, how much depends on how good the level of tech used (these circuits also negatively effect fill factor, which is the coverage of the sensor pad across the pixel).
John Carlson June 12th, 2006, 03:50 AM Hi,
I finally found a place to upload the clip and posted a small clip over there, let me know what you think. It's defnitely isnt blooming since blooming usually follows the object and it moves as you move the camera. In my case, it's always in the same area wherever I move the camera.
Manu Paty June 13th, 2006, 03:46 AM Sanyo said :
"
Please remember my previous comments. For the US market, we are "looking" at allowing it and "may" make it available.
Also, the HD1 firmware since initial shipment is still the most current firmware.
"
posted by "sanyo" on steve's forum. I think, like wayne said, many units should be returned...and guys don't know these are bugs.
i still propose massive mail... !!! I've already sent 7 mails containing bugs description to differents adress of sanyo's support.
I hope they will react, on line.
Wayne Morellini June 13th, 2006, 10:30 AM Hi Guys!
John Carlson has a new bug, purple lines coming into his low light footage. He is on a tight time line to return the camera (days). If some of you would like to got over there and help him verify it is just a bug with his camera, I'm sure he would be appreciated.
Testing your cameras in extreme low light for these vertical column lines is probably the best thing.
The thread is here:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?p=496914
Wayne Morellini June 13th, 2006, 10:54 AM Guys, last night I realised something. Around a month ago Sanyo here told me that the camera wouldn't get here for, I think, three months. This was shocking, as it didn't make sense. It occurred to me, maybe they are waiting for something, a manufacturing revision with the bugs ironed out maybe, a 25fps UltraSHQ 9mb/s+ camera (please) even. But then they would still be up against at least one superior HD h264 camera, so maybe they might release a HD2.
On a 6 month release cycle, a big brother to the HD1, would make sense (with a much cheaper ironed out HD1 revision I can recommend to people). Even if I was Spielberg, I would still like a pocket second camera like this to carry around, so it is worth doing right.
I think this makes sense because, in my local city we have almost every major retail chain store, and not one of them sells Sanyo cameras, and I don't know of any store that does. This camera is the sort of thing that can be used to get Sanyo products back into shops, but in two months the first superior 720p H264 pocket camera will be available, ruining this retail advantage with out a competitive model (or they are waiting for ironed out model or 25fps).
Manu Paty June 16th, 2006, 03:46 AM posted on steve's forum:
"Posted: Thu Jun 15th, 2006 11:46 am
I've found that there is no problem when playing back by the camera itself. Even you zoom in the video, the quality of "\" lines is the same of the "/" lines, in the OLED screen.
The bug exists ONLY in software playback, all my tested softwares, including QuickTime, VLC, ffdshow.
So, it's possible a small program or filter software can fix the problem of the files recorded, before the firmware update is available."
Wayne Morellini June 16th, 2006, 08:24 AM That's curious, it might indicate that the screen gets uncompressed video (though the zoom is going to have to have at least 4 times the resolution to come up on the smallest pixel, 16 times before you can easily see it on the small screen).
I think the fault is recorded by the camera. What do you see when you playback from the camera to HD screen (or TV with 4-16 times zoom)?
Carlos Serrano June 16th, 2006, 08:52 AM I´ve just connected the camera to a HD projector throught component cable and the problem is still there.:-(
Bo Lorentzen June 16th, 2006, 09:11 AM Carlos,
Thank you for trying that, I was thinking the same thing yesterday.
Too bad, for one moment I was thinking that one could do straight playback and skip the problem... Oh Well. soo much for dreaming. (smile)
Bo
www.bophoto.com/HDV
Wayne Morellini June 16th, 2006, 09:33 AM Processing software to get rid of it should still be possible.
I've just noticed something interesting about the AVCHD camera format (18Mb/s h264) is that there is no 30p or 25p 720p, it goes from 24p straight to 50/60p. I think it more likely now that those modes will have 18mb/s. Should give pocket cams with out the quality problems of the Sanyo. I wonder if anybody over at the AVC threads have noticed this:
http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/prModelDetail?storeId=11301&catalogId=13251&itemId=97439&modelNo=Content05102006070009078&surfModel=Content05102006070009078
Felipe Del Villar June 19th, 2006, 10:54 AM I kind of agree with Manu, I don't see the jagged edges when watching videos in my HDTV, just a hint of blurriness in the edges (but I have to try very hard).
In the computer screen however, is very evident.
I use a 55" projection TV and for playback a Showcenter 200 network media player. My guess is that there is some kind of interlacing that is "fixing" part of the problem, probably because the output of the showcenter is 1080i.
Carlos Barbino June 19th, 2006, 04:22 PM Wayne, regarding the AVCHD standard: wouldn't 50/60P be better than 25/30P?
You can always throw out every other frame in post production to get a 25/30P product from the 50/60P stream, but the higher frame rate is there if you want smoother motion or to get a slow motion effect.
Wayne Morellini June 20th, 2006, 11:37 AM Yes, it is just likely that these modes might get the full 18mb/s. 24p might be reserved for more expensive cameras.
Also dividing the 18mb/s into 60/50fps, leads to lower performance then 30/25fps. I think it is a bit too much, but as 24fps is the main worry for quality, maybe it will be alright if that can work at 24fps. I still prefer the 50mb/s intra frame pro version though.
Chris Taylor July 24th, 2006, 09:04 PM So will the HD1A have corrected firmware ??
Roman Oulko July 28th, 2006, 09:53 PM After getting tired of all problems with my camera and frustration that I can’t return because it been more that 30 days and sending emails to Sanyo with no response. I have decided to go directly to Sanyo’s office in Chatsworth CA. Yesterday I went to them . I spoke with John I tried to explain and show him what problems I (we) have 1. Stabilization 2. Low light recording 3. Purple leaves instead of green and my dog purple in HD. He denied that problems exist with camera at all and they have not received any complains but he said that some cameras experiencing problem described here http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?p=495645#post495645 even though he saw purple by himself when he made a small video inside an office. I told him either fix those problems or take camera back. He said that he can’t fixed problems in my camera because there is nothing wrong with camera. He gave a phone number of Mr. Duarte I spoke with him today he said same thing there is no problem but I asked him to take look at my camera one more time and I will bring more footage he agreed . So, I will bring my camera with footage On Monday at Sanyo office and leave there and he will call me back with results. So if anyone has footage with problems give a file I try to transfer to my card and give it to him. oh yea and John told me that HD1A is almost same camera just more features
Thank you
Wayne Morellini July 28th, 2006, 11:52 PM Roman, there are many threads here with reports of various (many) bugs, purple dog sounds like another one, and many sample clips that you could download. But if anybody has better, please send to Roman. Unless they were designed in Mpeg4 that way, there is no way it is not a bug, and that goes for a lot of things.
It would be interesting to find out how many readers, including the hidden ones, have found bugs? Would be suggested for all readers to report everything to Sanyo.
Graham Jones July 29th, 2006, 03:18 AM Well done, Roman.
Rafael Rivera July 29th, 2006, 12:33 PM Roman, I have two movies you might want to use. They're not my best examples of a defective HD1 I returned to Amazon (great place to purchase gear from, though), as those never made it past the early editing stage. But I've got two that show a split screen difference in exposure and artifactual bars of alternating exposure levels. I can also attest to the purple artifact as well, still present in my replacement HD1. Email me to let me know if you'd like to download them, and I'll send you the links.
Lance Richman July 30th, 2006, 01:44 AM seems like a minor issue but it is a very visible defect in recordings of lower light levels. If they told me it had this problem I wouldn't have bought the camera. I took a quick vid just now, the problem is noticible. IMO the room is well lit enough to take good video. Other times it is much worse. Here is the link
http://www.lanceandrachel.com/SANY0035.MP4
There is a definite vertical line about the middle of the screen, with the entire left side looking different from the right. You can minimize the effect some by messing with some of the settings however slight changes in light levels or background can make it stand out prominantly. I had hoped that it was a viewfinder issue but it shows up in the recorded video. It is not a memory card compatibility issue, the camera shows this problem with no card at all.
If you could talk to them and get some information from them about this I and others with this problem would be most grateful. Good luck and thanks.
Roman Oulko July 30th, 2006, 07:26 PM Hi Lance i just downloaded your file and transferred to my my camera.
thank you for footage
Wayne Morellini August 14th, 2006, 11:32 PM Roman, what happened with your meeting?
While you are there, could you ask if it is possible for somebody to arrange to get a camera SDK/limited SDK, so I can program a new compression scheme? But do this after you find out about everything else.
Thanks
Wayne.
Roman Oulko August 15th, 2006, 01:35 PM Today I got a call from Mr. Durte. His responds was that there is nothing wrong with my camera . I just left him a message i want to know about a footage that gave it to him on my card. I will get to you guys as soon as i get a call back
Lance Richman August 15th, 2006, 11:04 PM Thank you very much for doing this and please do keep us posted.
Roman Oulko August 18th, 2006, 04:27 PM Hello Guys yesterday I got my camera back from Sanyo. Camera was not in need of repairs I was told by Mr. Duarte So my purple dog , leaves and terrible low light footage are just part of my imagination. Personally I’m DONE with Sanyo I’m giving my camera to my sister she is 10 to play with. I was lucky I was able got hold of Sony FX 1E camera. Footage is unbelievable so I’m moving to Sony FX1 forum . Here an address for repairs for cameras with split screen issue if you have this address already then guys sorry
Customer Care Service
11343 Moorpark St.
Studio City CA 91602
Tel 1 (818) 508 0947
PS.please provide valid receipt or proof of purchase
And you want to give a call to Mr. Duarte and tell him how “great” Sanyo HD camera is here is his Phone number 1 (818) 717 2755 Ext. 457
Mike Lewis August 19th, 2006, 03:57 AM I was lucky I was able got hold of Sony FX 1E camera.
Hope you're getting a nice BIG case to put it in!
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=39573
|
|