Simon Hansen
May 7th, 2006, 07:23 AM
Just thought I would let you know we have the prototye and will be posting footage around and about as we can during the shooting of "spoon". More info and pictures will be posted here http://indiefilmlive.blogspot.com
Simon Hansen
May 7th, 2006, 07:36 AM
Just to be absolutely clear. This camera exists. It works. It works WELL!. And we're shooting a feature on it beginning 10 May. To see footage and follow the process we will post info and clips as often as our schedule allows. visit: http://indiefilmlive.blogspot.com
Thanks to silicon imaging and cineform for making it all possible.
Wayne Morellini
May 7th, 2006, 02:01 PM
Simon, I know this might be a bit too ask. But, could you post colour processed stills along side the raw straight stuff as the movie goes, and maybe the odd micro clip, so people can see the beauty of this system?
Thanks
Wayne.
Jason Rodriguez
May 7th, 2006, 05:09 PM
BTW, Wayne, when you talk about "RAW straight stuff", please remember that the color matrix, white-balance, etc., is all metadata-so the data IS always "RAW straight stuff", even when it looks like it's going through color-processing. If you don't like what we do, just flip a switch off in Premiere Pro, and you're back into a completely non-color corrected space. But that doesn't make those types of images more "RAW" than the others . . . the RAW data is always there, and it always has to be color-corrected at some point, whether it's with the metadata in the file header, or with another color-correction tool.
Wayne Morellini
May 7th, 2006, 05:35 PM
Of course, I am talking about web jpegs of untouched frames off the camera etc, versus the sort of finale colored images that you get after conditioning to go to the theatre. Showing potential customers just what can be done with the images (probably also helps to explain to them that all cameras go through the same process aswell).
Thanks
Wayne.
Chris Hurd
May 21st, 2006, 11:53 AM
Simon's blog covering their work with this camera on the feature "Spoon" deserved to be its own topic, so I've split it out of Jason's thread.