Jeff Miller
March 10th, 2006, 01:28 PM
I worked hard for two years of weekends helping a guy shoot an independent digital feature. It has wrapped, and we are in post. However the machine he's editting on really worries me. It is the best that he can afford, but has several shortcomings:
-Early 90's Avid software with quasi-proprietary hardware running on NT4
-Analog I/O only (we might as well have shot in VHS)
-Less then 20g of storage, spread across a dozen external SCSI drives
-Hardware/software problems that I'm too afraid to fix
He basically got it used from his work, as it's what he could afford. I've no problem with using the old tools that you are familiar and comfy with. But sometimes that thought doesn't translate into computers, I've thrown away better machines then this. I'm just really afraid that he's going to get halfway though the movie and that thing will die, and none of the work will be portable to a modern platform. And, that we might not be creating the best product possible (with all the D/A conversions, limited effects, etc etc).
Is this a normal thing to worry about? Has anyone editted a feature movie with lesser gear?
-Early 90's Avid software with quasi-proprietary hardware running on NT4
-Analog I/O only (we might as well have shot in VHS)
-Less then 20g of storage, spread across a dozen external SCSI drives
-Hardware/software problems that I'm too afraid to fix
He basically got it used from his work, as it's what he could afford. I've no problem with using the old tools that you are familiar and comfy with. But sometimes that thought doesn't translate into computers, I've thrown away better machines then this. I'm just really afraid that he's going to get halfway though the movie and that thing will die, and none of the work will be portable to a modern platform. And, that we might not be creating the best product possible (with all the D/A conversions, limited effects, etc etc).
Is this a normal thing to worry about? Has anyone editted a feature movie with lesser gear?