Bill Taka
February 19th, 2006, 11:58 AM
I have been out filming the last few weeks testing different frame rates. I have always used 60i however I do like the "look" of the 24f/30f. But now I am at a crossroads and I am seeking experienced opinions on this matter. Here's my dilemma.
1. Using 24f or 30f - As mentioned I like the look however I find I am limited on my depth of field which is very important to me. In many situations, if I use a shutter higher than 1/100, to control aperature, I increase the stutter effect. Thus I have no depth (ND filters will only help so much). Any Recommendations?
2. When using 60i - I get the smooth motion however a lot of people see it as the video look. I refer to it as the "familiar" look. Which is fine, however often I seen the interlaced artifacts effect especially in the high contrast areas. Any ideas on presets? (XL2/H1).
I will begin my next project soon an I would like to try out the 24f/30f rates and I'm wondering if people have used both 60i and 24f in the same project?
My project will be dvd out but I'm having a hard time with this decision.
Thanks for your advise.
1. Using 24f or 30f - As mentioned I like the look however I find I am limited on my depth of field which is very important to me. In many situations, if I use a shutter higher than 1/100, to control aperature, I increase the stutter effect. Thus I have no depth (ND filters will only help so much). Any Recommendations?
2. When using 60i - I get the smooth motion however a lot of people see it as the video look. I refer to it as the "familiar" look. Which is fine, however often I seen the interlaced artifacts effect especially in the high contrast areas. Any ideas on presets? (XL2/H1).
I will begin my next project soon an I would like to try out the 24f/30f rates and I'm wondering if people have used both 60i and 24f in the same project?
My project will be dvd out but I'm having a hard time with this decision.
Thanks for your advise.