Cory James
January 18th, 2006, 11:54 AM
I'm using a Canon H1 on an upcoming feature, and I don't know if I want Firestores or not because I have a question. Nobody seems to be talking about the quality of the compressed firestore image versus the compressed tape image.
I talked with the Birns and Sawyer folk here in LA, who along with a bunch of DPs, screened footage from the new Canon and Panasonic on a giant movie screen and were impressed with the Panasonic (they didn't have a chance to see that much) but were completely "blown away" by the Canon (with a straight face they said it looked 90 - 95 percent as good as the F900!)
According to those there, the HD-SDI output (1.4 G/s) and the HDV tape (25 mp/s) output were both amazing, with some loss on the tape but not anything like what they had guessed. It looked fantastic. Confused, they asked and were told that the HDV tape actually gets up to 40 Mb/s, not 25, which helped explain it. (They were still amazed).
So to my point, if the tape gets more like 40 mb/s, will I be losing image quaility if I use a firestore? I looked at some specs that said the firestore was 25 mb/s. Is that right? Does it actually get more?
If there's a difference (ie. the tape is better), I'd rather spend the time capturing it all than lose that much image quality (this may be a film-out).
I realize this is all on the vanguard, and I'll be attending a seminar and B and S at the end of the month where I'll try to get them to screen this stuff (if anyone from there is reading, do it), but if anyone has any thoughts , please rock on with them.
I talked with the Birns and Sawyer folk here in LA, who along with a bunch of DPs, screened footage from the new Canon and Panasonic on a giant movie screen and were impressed with the Panasonic (they didn't have a chance to see that much) but were completely "blown away" by the Canon (with a straight face they said it looked 90 - 95 percent as good as the F900!)
According to those there, the HD-SDI output (1.4 G/s) and the HDV tape (25 mp/s) output were both amazing, with some loss on the tape but not anything like what they had guessed. It looked fantastic. Confused, they asked and were told that the HDV tape actually gets up to 40 Mb/s, not 25, which helped explain it. (They were still amazed).
So to my point, if the tape gets more like 40 mb/s, will I be losing image quaility if I use a firestore? I looked at some specs that said the firestore was 25 mb/s. Is that right? Does it actually get more?
If there's a difference (ie. the tape is better), I'd rather spend the time capturing it all than lose that much image quality (this may be a film-out).
I realize this is all on the vanguard, and I'll be attending a seminar and B and S at the end of the month where I'll try to get them to screen this stuff (if anyone from there is reading, do it), but if anyone has any thoughts , please rock on with them.