View Full Version : Misc. Open DV from 2003


M. Bazaillion
January 6th, 2003, 04:46 PM
Anyone tried out the New JVC DV5000U Yet?

Adrian Seah
January 9th, 2003, 07:46 PM
Hi everyone,

I was just going through the watchdog and came across this thread:

http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?s=&threadid=4271

It seemed rather incredible that a camera without progressive can can be tricked into producing video which is 25P (for PAL)... I actually tried it out with my old PC100E with FCP 3 and it really works!

Sorry if this seems to be repeating the thread, Chris you may remove it if you want but I just thought it is incredible and would like to bring it to everyone's attention in a more general section of the board.

Regards,
Adrian

Felix Jones
January 24th, 2003, 06:21 PM
Hi there,

I'm trying to find out where in New Zealand offers courses for Adobe Premiere or Avid DV certifications? Avid mentions unitec on their website , but i can't find any courses there.

Thanks in advance.

Alex Taylor
February 3rd, 2003, 08:10 PM
DV.COM has a really interesting article (http://www.dv.com/features/features_item.jhtml;jsessionid=IFTUCEUZRVOPEQSNDBGCKH0CJUMEKJVN?category=Archive&LookupId=/xml/feature/2002/johnson1202) on a few multicamera DV shoots for concert videos. It covers a few lesser known bands as well as a multi-camera concert shoot at a Garbage (www.garbage.com) show. Definitely worth checking out!

Glen Evans
February 12th, 2003, 11:42 AM
I have just signed up with alamDV2 a sort of "community" SFX software.

Owners of the software send in SFX files they have created. Blood, gun shots, muzzle flashes, light sabers.

Basically, with the software you can incorporate SFX into your movie. I signed up yesterday, but keep getting a file error problem once I have downloaded the program. It won´t install with my XP system.

The site is: http://www.csb-digital.com/alamdv/

Once I get this downloaded and installed properly, I think it will be fun playing around with it.

Interested in seeing what others think of this program.

Jami Jokinen
February 14th, 2003, 03:54 AM
I'm about to make a documentary based almost entirely on still photos. I'll be using Canopus Imaginate to pan/zoom etc. and Premiere to edit the whole thing, adding basic dissolve transitions, color correction and sound.

The finished program will be published on DVD.

What should be considered during editing and especially encoding to mpeg2 to have the best possible quality? What settings should be used, should I go for interlaced or progressive?

Imran Zaidi
March 17th, 2003, 10:53 AM
This past Saturday I went to see a film playing at the Florida Film Festival entitled "The Technical Writer". I didn't know anything about it from a filmmaking perspective - I only went because I used to be a Technical Writer in a past life, and was curious about the subject matter.

While watching the film on a fairly large screen (Universal Cineplex in Orlando, FL) I originally thought it was a standard 16mm film, maybe even 35mm. Great colors, vivid, sharp. Then I noticed a few digital artifacts that threw me for a loop. Then as I started paying closer attention, I realized this was a digital film (there were some specific scenes that gave it away). Luckily, the filmmaker was actually present and fielded our questions. Turns out, it was one of Sony's new IMX cameras.

So I did a search, and found this.

http://www.sonympeg-imx.com/articles/article_38.shtml

All I can say is that while I generally really notice digital-to-film transfers rightaway, this one totally fooled me at first. It's not perfect, but it is the best I've seen yet. The progressive scan kept the frames clear and sharp, the colors were great, and it totally stood up to the test of having it projected on a large theater screen.

They even had some outside night shots that used only available light (!!), and it looked surprisingly good.

Needless to say, I was impressed.

Don Paul
March 31st, 2003, 01:13 AM
Looking for a sony sc100 I can buy as a backup unit.Anyway to
convert to black and white viewfinder?

Julia Moreno
May 19th, 2003, 08:45 AM
Hello all:

We are in process of acquiring equipment for a video duplication system. We are looking for professional rack enclosure vendors/distributors in the Philadelphia, PA area.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks,
Julia Moreno
James DeCrescenzo Reporting
1700 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
www.JDReporting.com

Bram Corstjens
June 9th, 2003, 04:28 PM
Hello people,

On another forum I started a thread about two ways of achieving widescreen on the TRV-60:

As a reference we'll start with the normal 4:3 image:
http://home.planet.nl/~snuve011/bram/normal.jpg

The widescreen mode is simple: Select the widescreen mode on the cam. It will capture a wider image from the CCD, compress it horizontally *BEFORE* writing it to the MiniDV Tape (720x576)
The result would look like this:
http://home.planet.nl/~snuve011/bram/widescreen.jpg

(when played with PowerDVD for example, the image will be stretched on the fly to get the correct proportions again)

This cam happens to have a progressive mode, which is 25 fps progressive and captures a wider horizontal and vertical view and is stored on the same 720x576 resolution. It would look like this:
http://home.planet.nl/~snuve011/bram/progressive2.jpg

If we cut out a 16:9 image out of this progressive image like this:
http://home.planet.nl/~snuve011/bram/16-9-cutout-progressive.jpg

...we theoretically get an image with a LOWER resolution than the original widescreen because we simply have cut off the top and bottom *AFTER* having captured to PC

Now we resize this lower resolution image back to 720x576 so we lose the original proportions and get this widescreen image image:
http://home.planet.nl/~snuve011/bram/16-9-cutout-progressive-enlarged.jpg

(again, this is stretched on the fly when played to get the final proportions)

Now the funny thing is: How can this cut-out image (which is actually a 720x420 image resized back to 720x576) be sharper than the 720x576 original widescreen image?

----

To (partially?) answer my own question: I think the 720x576 resulution is higher than most cams can actually use. By that I mean the TRV-60 for example will record LESS detail than the MiniDV format can save. When the progressive mode is activated, it gives us a little bit more detail which still can easy be saved on the MiniDV tape.

If you look closely you'll indeed notice (apart from the wider view) the progressive mode is more sharp/detailed than the normal mode.

I actually think this mode is so much sharper that if we cut out a 16:9 image out of the progressive image, the resulting (enlarged back to 720x576) image is still sharper than the original 16:9 widescreen.

Would this be an acceptable theory? Any comments welcome...!

Josh Bass
June 18th, 2003, 05:35 PM
Does anyone have a set method for doing this? The XL1s would be in frame mode, if that helps. My friend with the DVX has been waiting for some instructions on how to do this, but he doesn't know about the pros (that'd be you guys) so I hoped I could get some help sooner. I'd rather not just have to plop them both down with monitors side by side and tweak.

Lou Bruno
June 28th, 2003, 01:10 PM
The MAIN menu of the JVC GY DV5000 displays ONLY head drum hours.
But did you know there is a hidden menu which displays every function as it relates to the actual time utilized by a specific function?

Why is this important? Well, for the videographer who wishes to purchase a used, refurbished or demo unit you can check actual overall hours used for different functions. For instance, you purchased a USED JVC GY DV5000 from another videographer. He states that the camera has little use on the heads. You think you just got a bargain until you check the HIDDEN MENU and discover the camera was used as a studio configuration for 1200 hours which you checked via the total power-up time located in the hidden menu!


Here is how you find, locate and execute the hidden HOUR METER:

1. PRESS BOTH the + and - EDIT SEARCH BUTTON

2. While holding the above -PRESS the STATUS BUTTON

3. NOW press AUTO/FAS and LOLUX while pressing the STATUS BUTTON

4. A HIDDEN MENU APPEARS WITH A LONG LIST-DO NOT CONFUSE THIS WITH THE SMALLER HIDDEN MENU WHICH APPEARS BY PUSHING ONLY THE STATUS, LOLUX and FAS/AUTO BUTTON. YOU MUST PRESS THE + and - EDIT SEARCH BUTTON and the STATUS BUTTON-- THEN THE ABOVE BUTTONS TO OBSERVE THE LONGER MENU.

5. SCROLL down to the hour meter-drum hours

YOU CAN NOW CHECK THE FOLLOWING:

DRUM HOURS
TOTAL DRUM HOURS
POWER METER-TIME POWERED-UP
REEL FWD TIME
TIMES LOADED
TIMES EJECTED
TOTAL FWD/REVERSED
TOTAL FF/REW
TOTAL HEAD CLEANER TIME-I ASSUME THIS IS THE INTERNAL HEAD CLEANER

By using the above menu selection you will be able to establish not only the amount of unit time used but what type of functions were used etc.

STAY TUNED-got a 'goodie' next time.

Lou Bruno

Joe Gioielli
August 18th, 2003, 01:17 PM
I was considering buying this for a low cost dv camera. It would only be used for "industrial" quality film. Nothing fancy. I know it is a low budget camera and I don't expect it to take the place of my VX, but just for simple things and fill in work. Also, is there something better that can be had in the 400-500. The only "deal breaker" is I need a nightvision mode of somekind.

Thanks for the help.

Alex Zabrovsky
September 5th, 2003, 06:14 AM
I have yet acquired my first miniDV (my GS100K-K is on its way...), but paid attention people often lament on frames dropouts with more or less frequency.
I was wondering what can cause such effect ?
Loss of video synchronization ? FireWIre communication issues ? Insufficient PC power to accept isochronious (continous timing) data for prolonged period ot time ?

Also, any links to miniDV (or DV ?) format technical information ?

regards, Alex

Carlos Rego
September 7th, 2003, 07:20 PM
can somebody tell me what are the differences between those two ? (becides the larger screen on the 900) ..

just wondering wich oen to get .. too bad none of them had DVCAM playback too :)

Dan Holly
September 9th, 2003, 02:46 PM
http://www.lowepro.com/pages/series/dryzone/dzone.htm

I just happened to be in a location which is a temporal rainforest that gets 200+ inches per year, and I was really worried. Luckily, it didn't rain a drop the whole time I was on the island.

I received this item for x-mas last year, and have probably zipped it and unzipped it maybe 200 times.

I'll be contacting Lowe in the next few days to see if the item is under warranty(I'm almost positive it is).

The whole point of posting this message is to make sure the next time you go out.....check your gear!!!!

I didn't even think about it when I left, I knew everything was in that bag besides fresh batteries and fresh tapes. I noticed the zipper malfunction when I first took off the pack to setup.

Rain could have cost me a trip to Canon repair, up to a new camera.

Lou Bruno
September 12th, 2003, 07:11 PM
Some individuals are noticing grain in the dark areas of the picture. Special event videographers are also noticing some grain in the tuxedo's of their clients.

To correct this situation.

Enter the menu.

Click Camera process.

Increase the Master Black to +3.

That should do the trick.

Standby for a future tip on how to get a "SONY LOOK" from the JVC GY DV5000.

Lou Bruno

Roze Ann
September 13th, 2003, 09:14 PM
Hey Folks... FYI... if you have a "BJ's Warehouse" (like Sams Clubs) in your area and can get hold of the coupon book they are running a GREAT offer right now. A $10.00 off coupon for the 6 pack on Fuji DVC 60's. The regular price of the 6 pack here in Raleigh, NC is $27.99 so that brings it down to $17.99 or $3.00 a tape! Best deal I've found so far. Otherwise use the forums sponsors. They are GREAT folks!

Also FYI... I spoke with a Fuji rep about the stock that goes to BJ's. She said it is EXACTLY the same as what we buy from a pro tape supplier. But I like the window better on the tapes from BJ's. They have a large horizontal window across both reels. The others I have bought only had a skinny vertical window over one side. Too dark to see anything. Anyway... best of luck and stock up!

Lou Bruno
September 17th, 2003, 06:39 PM
SONY- LOOK WITH THE JVC GYDV5000

MASTER Black Level +3

Detail +1

Knee 80%

SKIN Detail ON

Color Matrix WARM*

Gamma -1

All of the above are located in the CAMERA PROCESS and ADVANCED CAMERA PROCESS menu.

*You can also use a 1/2 WARM card OR a Tiffen WARM filter (812) but you have to white balance then place the filter on the lens. NEVER WB with the filter set to ON.

By crushing your blacks too much with the compress switch it affects the overall picture. The -1 or even -2 GAMMA does the job slightly and increases color saturation. The WARM setting introduces a somewhat SONY red. ALSO-if you use a better lens such as a 19X Canon or 20X Fujinon, you will see a closer SONY-TYPE look.

Miles Loretta
October 5th, 2003, 03:46 PM
How hard is it to clean inside the lens? There are some dust particles in there that are right in the center of the lens. Is it something a camera repair shop can clean?

Federico Dib
October 8th, 2003, 07:42 PM
Hi, I´ve uploaded a few "modified" frame grabs from a video I shot a few months ago on a Harley Davidson anniversary meeting here In Barcelona.

Here´s the link for the "enhanced" version:
FJIDIB.TK (www.fjidib.tk)


If you want to see the Original Frame grabs directly from the XM2 go here...
Original unmodified grabs (http://64.5.61.10/~federico/federico/originales/)
(These ones are JPG compressed at 50% for space reasons.. so the Real Originals actually look better. But no other modification was made to these).

Please keep in mind this is just an alfa test site.. Just to check out my new server speed and stuff like that..

Barry James Hillis
October 13th, 2003, 02:50 PM
Can some one please help .We were given a Sony picture computerXV-T600 and a SonyXv-C700 video multi color corrector but with no manules .Can any one help with the manuals ?

Francesco Marano
October 21st, 2003, 04:44 AM
Ciao,

when the dv format was introduced was predisposed also for the high definition.
Someone knows the parameters of the format hd-dv?

Francesco

Mike Zorger
October 23rd, 2003, 07:47 AM
Who is going, I am. Its kind of $$ but i'm a student so it wont be as bad. Hope to see lots of peopel there from the indrustry. http://www.digitalmediadc.com/

Keith Laurent
October 25th, 2003, 01:30 PM
Hi, I'm new to this forum and I know it's rather bad form to dive in with a request for help, but to be quite honest, I'm at the end of my tether! So, albeit rather humbly, perhaps someone can assist and thanks in advance if you can. I also apologise if this is the wrong forum, I have to admit the choice frazzled my brain and this one seemed the nearest.

I can't get my Sony PC-120 digital camcorder to be recognised by any video editing software. Using firewire link, I switch on the camcorder into playback mode and hey presto, winXP recognises it fine (as "Digital Video Device") and asks me which program I wish to use to work with.

The default is Moviemaker II and I also have a copy of Adobe Premier. As soon as I try to get the camcorder to communicate with either of these programs, they just hang. The egg-timer is on and sits there for several minutes, after which I am told the program is not responding and to close it.

So, XP knows my camcorder is there, so the firewire/XP process works. It's just the software that won't work. The fact both react in the same way suggests this is not a specific MM2 or Adobe issue? It's as if my camcorder is alien to both sets of software.

However, I did get MovieMaker to work once by pure luck, and only once. I cannot remember how exactly, but all I know is that it was in timeout mode, I went down to watch TV (in a rage of frustration!), came back up 4 hours later and it seemed to have synched in. But ever since, even if I leave it for hours, the software has simply timed out. The fact it worked momentarily though, kind of fuzzes the issue a little.

I have searched the web for forums and websites that might discuss this, but found little or nothing. The one place was some place called "papa johns" but this is now offline (404 error) and last time I browsed it, the issue didn't seem to be noted there anyway. I have a gut feeling it's likely to be something simple and obvious, it often is.

Cheers in advance for anyone who has a clue and once again, apologies for such a 'begging' beginning to my time on these forums. Hopefully I can reciprocate any help in time, I will certainly endeavour to do so.

Regards.

David Slingerland
November 19th, 2003, 05:01 AM
Hello ,
Does somebody have any experience with wireless radio transmittors, digital radio camera systems? Do you know of any American publications in American magazine's on similair systems or on the one below?
It is made by BBC Wiscape.

WiCam™-C

WiScape's newest product, the WiCam-C, is designed to meet the needs of SNG and ENG newsgathering teams. The lightweight, clip-on unit provides from-the-battleline footage with the highest quality digital wireless connectivity. WiCam-C also introduces an easy-to-use built in configuration interface making on-the-fly changes simpler and fast enough to outmanoeuvre your competitors.

John Jay
November 24th, 2003, 02:03 PM
I found this

http://www.sonylfs.com/index/interfac.htm

whilst looking for a cable from 26 pin CCZ to RGB plus Y/C cable splitter. If you know where to get one please tell

Imran Zaidi
December 28th, 2003, 10:26 AM
"After years of Hollywood hype, 2004 could truly be a watershed year for digital cinema..."

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=technologyNews&storyID=4049134