Curt Talbot
January 4th, 2006, 07:42 PM
I have a VX2000 and an older D8. Recently I decided that it would be nice to have a good quality camcorder that was smaller than my VX2000 to take on holidays etc and to use as a second camera for the occasional wedding that I do.
I thought a good used TRV900 would be a nice match as it has a good reputation, uses the same batteries as the VX2000 and is ok in low light. However, after reading many of the posts here I am wondering if I should spend a little more and get a HDR-HC1. Good used 900's are going for $850 to $1200 US (seems like an awful lot to me). For a few hundred dollars more one could begin thinking about the HC1.
Here's my question: assuming that I only use the HC1 for SD, would the resulting picture quality be better than any consumer camcorders? How does the low light ability compare to the 900 and 950?
It strikes me that it would be better to buy for the future. I have a HD tv so I could enjoy good quality home movies while waiting for blu-ray or whatever to come around.
Any thoughts or experiences that you can share would be appreciated.
Curt
I thought a good used TRV900 would be a nice match as it has a good reputation, uses the same batteries as the VX2000 and is ok in low light. However, after reading many of the posts here I am wondering if I should spend a little more and get a HDR-HC1. Good used 900's are going for $850 to $1200 US (seems like an awful lot to me). For a few hundred dollars more one could begin thinking about the HC1.
Here's my question: assuming that I only use the HC1 for SD, would the resulting picture quality be better than any consumer camcorders? How does the low light ability compare to the 900 and 950?
It strikes me that it would be better to buy for the future. I have a HD tv so I could enjoy good quality home movies while waiting for blu-ray or whatever to come around.
Any thoughts or experiences that you can share would be appreciated.
Curt