View Full Version : Camcorder 16-235


Pages : 1 [2]

Noa Put
August 30th, 2023, 02:44 AM
Enough out of you.

Stow it, please.

Well, good luck in finding answers to your questions with that kind of attitude.

Pete Cofrancesco
August 30th, 2023, 07:14 AM
He probably isn't buying any camera least of all one that anyone else suggests. Like I said before internet forums are for arguing and debating.

Doug Jensen
August 30th, 2023, 07:27 AM
Well, good luck in finding answers to your questions with that kind of attitude.

Noa, he's not looking for any real answers and hasn't expressed a scrap of gratitude for other people taking the time to offer help. Not even to Chris Young, who went way beyond the call of duty with his lengthy reply. People like him think they knows everything already and just want to argue when presented with facts. If he is so smart, it makes you wonder why he even posted in the first place where he's sure to only get half-assed suggestions from morons like us.

Noa Put
August 30th, 2023, 07:29 AM
Agree, seems to be just here for a technical discussion, I tried to give some helpful feedback but looks like he doesn't appreciate anything and is not willing to accept anything from anyone. Well, I"m out, wasted enough time. :)

Barry Lloyd
September 21st, 2023, 03:49 AM
I'm looking for a camcorder in the under-$2,000 range with just one requirement:

It MUST have a video output range of 8-bit 16-235 (BT.709), otherwise no deal.

OK if selectable between 16-235 and 0-255.

Thank you.

What has not been metioned I don't think is why such a specific specification and what is the purpose, and also to video what that requires that output.

Having had 3 different camcorders over the past 12 years I find it hard to justify a particular requirement.

Doug Jensen
September 21st, 2023, 10:02 AM
He was just a troll that has since moved on. Good riddance.

Barry Lloyd
September 22nd, 2023, 01:41 AM
https://i.imgur.com/OoKjcb7.jpg