Matthew Overstreet
October 30th, 2005, 11:45 AM
I'm curious of everyone's thoughts on staging in film. Specifically, cuts compared to long masters.
I noticed in some films (the only example I can think of is Arlington Road), you notice there are long masters, where instead of cutting, they physically move the camera to reframe. I think Woody Allen does this as well. What are the benefits to this method? And when would you be most likely to use it.
In other films, Road to Perdition for example, there is camera movement, but only in short bursts. The director tends to cut from shot to shot, rather than physically move the camera. Again, what do people think of this technique?
I'm just curious as to everyone's thoughts.
I noticed in some films (the only example I can think of is Arlington Road), you notice there are long masters, where instead of cutting, they physically move the camera to reframe. I think Woody Allen does this as well. What are the benefits to this method? And when would you be most likely to use it.
In other films, Road to Perdition for example, there is camera movement, but only in short bursts. The director tends to cut from shot to shot, rather than physically move the camera. Again, what do people think of this technique?
I'm just curious as to everyone's thoughts.