Cliff Totten
March 20th, 2016, 09:35 AM
I have had my new FS5 for three days now and overall, I'm loving it.
However, it's 1:1 pixel readout creates a sightly softer image than the wonderfully over sampled UHD images that we see with the X70/AX100, RX10-II and A7S-II and A7R-II. (Although I don't own an A6300, we are seeing many web videos now that show it's incredible oversampling/scaling ability)
I started tinkering with the "detail" settings in the FS5's picture profiles. On the X70, the setting changes are easily visible and very obvious, especially so on a large UHD monitor. But on the FS5, with it's similar "detail" options and settings, they seem to have little effect at all. Even extreme values seem to only effect the image ever so slightly.
Anybody else notice this on their FS5?
However, it's 1:1 pixel readout creates a sightly softer image than the wonderfully over sampled UHD images that we see with the X70/AX100, RX10-II and A7S-II and A7R-II. (Although I don't own an A6300, we are seeing many web videos now that show it's incredible oversampling/scaling ability)
I started tinkering with the "detail" settings in the FS5's picture profiles. On the X70, the setting changes are easily visible and very obvious, especially so on a large UHD monitor. But on the FS5, with it's similar "detail" options and settings, they seem to have little effect at all. Even extreme values seem to only effect the image ever so slightly.
Anybody else notice this on their FS5?