View Full Version : No Wide Version??


Kevin Dooley
October 17th, 2005, 12:28 PM
I usually keep my screen resolution at my LCD's native (1280x1024) and use the "wide" version of DVinfo.com forums... but the choice has disappeared today and now I'm stuck with a version that only fills half the screen. What happened??

Chris Hurd
October 17th, 2005, 12:37 PM
Hi Kevin, pardon our dust... try this link:

http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/index.php?styleid=10

Kevin Dooley
October 17th, 2005, 12:39 PM
Thanks Chris, however its a no go on that link.

But if you're just restructuring and promise the wide version will be back, I can be patient....

Chris Hurd
October 17th, 2005, 01:16 PM
Ack, stand by and I'll see what I can do...

James Emory
October 17th, 2005, 06:11 PM
Chris, I clicked on that link to see what wide looked like and now I can't get it to go back to narrow. Do you have a link for the narrow option? I get an error and nothing happens when I try to change views in the drop down menu. The narrow version is better for you because it makes it look like even more people are visiting in the Current Users section. As of today, I am also having trouble logging out. I have to click that link that says An error occurred while attempting to log you out. Click here to log out. for it to release me.

Boyd Ostroff
October 17th, 2005, 06:16 PM
See the Style Chooser drop down menu on the bottom left of the page. It should allow you to choose formats.

-EDIT-

Oh, I see... it doesn't seem to switch to narrow even though it lists it as an option. I'm sure Chris will get this all sorted out soon :-)

Chris Hurd
October 17th, 2005, 06:39 PM
Yeah, it's a tad wonky at the moment... but I'm workin' on it!

Justin Kohli
October 18th, 2005, 10:49 AM
I personally prefer to read (and design) forum or content widths at no greater than 600-650 pixels about, otherwise your eyes have to scan too far from left-to-right, and it's more work which can get bothersome.

Kevin Dooley
October 18th, 2005, 10:59 AM
That's why it's great to have choices. I personally prefer to have more content visable on the screen at one time, especially in forums where I do a lot of reading.

Chris Hurd
October 24th, 2005, 05:57 PM
The "Blue-White" style has been taken down temporarily but will be fully restored very soon.

Michael Wisniewski
October 24th, 2005, 06:22 PM
Hey, that temp style is pretty nice. Easy to read the forum categories.

Pete Bauer
October 24th, 2005, 06:34 PM
Here's another thumbs up for this temp style. I can see links better and just generally like the look.

Robert Mann Z.
October 25th, 2005, 12:17 AM
i like the temp style much better, much easier to read and navigate...

Lorinda Norton
October 25th, 2005, 12:45 AM
What are you guys talking about? Doesn't it just blast your retinas? And some of the fonts are so big now I feel like I'm reading the "large print" version. :) Maybe it's just my computer.

I really like the original style. Not that I'd gripe if everyone wanted to keep the new look, but honestly, this one (for now) is driving my eyes bonkers.

Steve House
October 25th, 2005, 04:06 AM
I'll second the favourable comments for the new style. To my geezered eyes on my monitor this is far more readable. The two-word description of the effect that comes to mind is "crisp & clean."

Pete Bauer
October 25th, 2005, 06:35 AM
Fortunately it isn't a matter of all of us having to live "in the same skin." The software allows a choice of "skins" -- the only downside being that Chris and his tech guy have to spend time to create them.

Some of us like this one and since it was intended as a temporary placeholder during upgrades, we're asking that it be kept. Definitely let Chris know what you like in a DVi skin so, with luck and Chris' good graces, your preferences are included as a choice on the drop-down list of skins.

Kevin Dooley
October 25th, 2005, 06:45 AM
Both of these skins have been available since the big reorganization a few months back (in a convenient drop down list--in fact there was a wide and a narrow version of the DVi blue and white version)... I however, prefer the one Chris et al. made (the blue and white DVi skin). This stock vBulletin skin I've never liked... it reeks of what I call the "dumbed down" look... big gaingly icons, overly large text... I much prefer the minimalist style that the forum re-launched with... but that's me.

Chris Hurd
October 25th, 2005, 07:06 AM
I prefer "minimalist" as well... and would rather have the "blue-white" version back. We're still going to offer the "old skool" classic DV Info look shortly as well. The Skinz drop-down menu shall return very soon.

Steve Crisdale
October 26th, 2005, 07:24 AM
I prefer "minimalist" as well... and would rather have the "blue-white" version back. We're still going to offer the "old skool" classic DV Info look shortly as well. The Skinz drop-down menu shall return very soon.

Mmmmm... this current incarnation had me wondering whether I was at DV Info: and not at the HD forum instead!!

There's quite a few video forums that have this look - so any likelihood that DV Info can again be visually distinguishable from the rest would be welcomed by me at the very least...

Thanks for your continuing efforts Chris!!

Chris Hurd
October 26th, 2005, 08:22 AM
Yup, this is yer "default" skin -- and strictly temporary -- although we'll keep it as a user selection.

John Jay
October 26th, 2005, 11:12 AM
What are you guys talking about? Doesn't it just blast your retinas? And some of the fonts are so big now I feel like I'm reading the "large print" version. :) Maybe it's just my computer.

I really like the original style. Not that I'd gripe if everyone wanted to keep the new look, but honestly, this one (for now) is driving my eyes bonkers.


Agreed. The white bits are tooo bright. How about 18% gray?

Kevin Dooley
November 16th, 2005, 12:43 PM
Any idea when the nice, pretty version of DVinfo will be back?

Chris Hurd
November 16th, 2005, 11:24 PM
We're working on it... when it's all said and done, there will be several pretty versions to choose from.

Versions. I said versions. Get your mind out of the gutter.