View Full Version : My First Real Shoot
Brock Burwell January 29th, 2014, 03:18 PM I have a question for you guys…
I am doing my first shoot with someone besides my church! I am excited, but a little nervous. I was hoping to get a little advice.
I'm actually driving about an 1.5 hours to the shoot and it's with my uncles auction house. I am actually staying with him Monday night and then the auction is Tuesday evening. I planned on trying to get some footage Monday night and then interviewing him on camera Tuesday during the day then obviously getting as much footage as I can Tuesday night. I have a desktop computer, but I plan on taking it and looking at the footage after I shoot the interview so I can make sure I got what I need from him.
I plan on shooting his interview outside. What time would be best to shoot it? I have stand up lights, but they all need to be plugged in. I imagine that the place I'd like to do the interview is a bit too far for that. I believe I have an umbrella, but I'm not sure.
I have a tri-pod and just plan on using it for most of my b-roll footage.
He basically just wants a short 2-3 minute video on what the place is and why someone would want to come there
I'm not really sure which format for this video would be best as I really only have 1 style (which is, interview someone and have b-roll while they talk). I'd like to mix it up, but I'm not really sure how. Any ideas on that?
Also, any overall advice for me?
John DuMontelle January 30th, 2014, 09:04 AM Some quick suggestions.
Conduct your interview either late in the afternoon or earlier in the morning when the sun is lower in the sky. The worst time to do any outdoor "natural light" interview is from 11am to 3pm when the sun is much higher and the light is less flattering. Many times the shadows will hide the eyes...or just plain look bad.
Second suggestion. Do two interviews. One in the morning and the second late afternoon. Try and ask different questions in each interview but...don't be shy about re-asking a question or two in the second interview which you asked in the first. By the second interview your subject should be a little more relaxed and when someone is relaxed their interview is always much better. You might even make sure they wear a different shirt or something to help differentiate between the two interviews. I'd also suggest you shoot each interview with the subject looking at the opposite screen direction from the first.
Plus...doing two interviews makes it seem like you spent more time with the subject and will give the viewer the idea your finished product has more depth of information. Look at any 60 minutes story and see how many times they interview the main subject. Rarely just once and, frankly doing this is not going to eat into your day of production as much as you might think since it's all natural light anyway.
For goodness sakes use your tripod on the interviews. Give your product a consistent level of quality. Not using the sticks for the interview is going to make it that much harder for your subject to relax. Now he has to look at you with a camera on your shoulder and answer questions? You are sabotaging your own work because you too will not be concentrating on doing a good interview. Now you're also worried about keeping your shot level and steady. You won't be listening to what he says...and odds are you'll miss the chance to ask a good follow-up question which will make the interview better. Plus your interview subject will be looking more often into the lens and that often looks amateur. Sure...some people want that "look right into the lens" type of interview but it also make the interview subject MUCH more nervous. It's up to you to make the interview the best it can and it all starts with making your interview subject ignore the fact they are being recorded and just have a conversation. Not an "interview".
Something else...think about what will be your opening and closing shot BEFORE you get to the point you want to edit. Do it while you're on the shoot and make them BOTH good. A good open and close shot are the bookends that set the tone for the entire story and make or break a quality product.
Start now focusing on making your ENTIRE product consistent. Using a tripod on some shots and not others may have good reasons but...for interviews? That's just being a little lazy and your video won't look any different than a newbie out doing their first story. Start making a professional product now. Bad habits are hard to break if you start doing them early.
Hope this helps.
Robert Benda January 30th, 2014, 10:07 AM Great advice from John.
IF you do shoot during a sunny day, try to put your subject in the shade. Near the edge of the shade where the sun comes from is nice, because you'll get a bit of bounce of light up to fill in their face, which is flattering. Or don't hesitate to use off camera light to fill someone's face if you need to.
Remember that it's easier to (slightly) brighten up some footage after the fact, than it is to fix an over exposed clip.
Not sure the style and purpose of the video, but for transitions a little movement is appropriate to make the setting - such as, slowly pulling towards or away from a location to show where you are (arriving or leaving). If you don't have a slider or glidecam, you can film a location/building with a wide shot, then a closer shot to show arrival, or the reverse to show you're leaving.
John DuMontelle January 30th, 2014, 10:19 AM The shade suggestion is a great idea too...but always remember if your subject is in the shade...to do your best to make as much of the background also in the shade too.
Always consider the entire frame you are shooting. Not just the subject.
Have the shaded side of the building, sign or...whatever...fill as much of the background as possible too.
A few points of "over-bright" spots in the frame aren't bad...but if the subject is exposed correctly but all of the background is blown-out/over exposed...it doesn't look good. ;)
Les Wilson January 30th, 2014, 10:38 AM You need a lavalier microphone or a shotgun on a boom. Using a camera mic will result in poor results. So much that your uncle may not want to show the video as it reflects poorly on his business.
Kyle Root January 30th, 2014, 12:19 PM All excellent points so far.
I would also like to stress the audio portion of this equation. Having excellent audio is paramount to making the final product watchable. If the audio is weak, noisy, not good, people will quickly move on to something else and not watch the video. Even if the video is somewhat lacking, if it has good audio, people will be more inclined to continue watching.
If it's windy outside, you're going to have a hard time getting quality audio... without spending a lot of money on wind socks and such.
A good shotgun on a boom plus also a lav mic would provide a good audio source (serving as a backup too)
Jon Fairhurst January 30th, 2014, 12:31 PM You can also backlight the subject with the sun. Just make sure that the full background is in shade. A reflector helps - not so much for fill light but to add a catch light to the eyes. Otherwise the eyes will be dark.
Here's a portrait I shot with that technique (without reflector, hence dark eyes). It was around noon in November up here in Washington State.
http://fairhurst.com/photos/Z-Tday2013/ScreenQuality/ZiimermanTday2013_02.JPG
FWIW, that's the Canon 100L macro on a full frame cam.
Had they been fully in shade, I wouldn't have gotten that magical halo and the lighting would have been flatter. Had the background been sunny, the faces would be dark and/or the background blown out. Facing the sun, the subjects would be squinting and harshly lit.
Les Wilson January 30th, 2014, 01:07 PM And then a cloud rolls by during an answer ... plan to spend time in post.
Brock Burwell January 30th, 2014, 04:10 PM Thanks for the responses guys…
This was the first video I did a couple weeks ago (I know the audio is terrible and I think I've worked that out for future videos)
The Open Door "Feed My Sheep" Program - YouTube
My second video was on my church as well, but is in basically the same format (interview/b-roll). I will finish it up this weekend.
I was hoping to maybe change things up a bit and try something new with his auction house video, but I'm not sure exactly what and how.
He's basically just wanting to raise awareness/basically let people know he exists and tell people why they should come.
Thanks for your help!
John DuMontelle January 30th, 2014, 05:44 PM I thought you did a nice job.
Natural sound.
Try and work more of it into your product.
At present you just have the interview with music running underneath it.
Try and weave some natural sound moments in to break up that "track" once in a while. Don't over do it. But at present it does not exist even though we see a lot of activity in your b-roll shots.
Even if it's just very low under the track but still loud enough to hear over the music...without burying the music. A laugh. A clink of metal. A swish of a spoon as it pours soup into a bowl. Hearing someone say "thank you". It doesn't have to be a long involved break. But it adds touches of reality and depth to your story. An extra audio "brush stroke" to make your project more finished.
But I liked the consistent quality you displayed here. Now the trick is to raise that quality bar. ;)
Brock Burwell January 31st, 2014, 09:26 AM Thanks a lot! I appreciate it. Great advice on the extra audio added in. I will definitely try to do that on my next video.
This video is my second video and I tried to have the same formula so I can get better at it. I will go in and add some of that extra audio in my next edit of this.
Other than that, can you give me some suggestions on this video? I have to clean it up a bit in spots and maybe fix the music, but what do advice do you have for this video
Open Door Media - YouTube
John DuMontelle February 4th, 2014, 09:09 AM Just saw your response...and I'm going to post some quick, short thoughts.
Please don't infer that I'm being mean because they are short and to the point.
There is nothing more boring than to start any project off with a talking head.
This video was about the services being broadcast. That's what you should have started with.
One better way (there are several) is first seeing the church service in progress...sound up full...then bring the guy's voice in, then go to him visually.
Or...seeing an exterior of the church while hearing the service in progress...then see AND hear the service in progress...then dove-tail the audio of the interview in on top of the church service audio (which is now lower, but still audible)...then go full to the guy talking and fade the church music away underneath him.
Or...starting in black, fade in the title graphic of the church all while first audio is the church service in progress...THEN see the church service in progress with the dove-tail audio ending up with interview full.
You should have woven that church service, audio AND video throughout this product. Not once or twice...several times. You didn't.
In fact, there's no natural sound at all. Just an interview voice(s).
The few times we did see the service, we couldn't hear anything. You effectively killed real emotion from being a part of this video. You need to make this video as engaging as possible to get people to really want to watch it. You're not making this video for the people you interviewed. You're making it to get people to want "more"...actually come to church or watch it on their computer.
This also goes back to my earlier suggestion about a quality open and close shot. As mentioned before...the talking-head does not cut it.
You also had grammar issues with your words on screen. Specifically when it mentions the church reaching people. "Since the inception of this ministry, they have reached people they thought possible." It should read "...reached more people than they thought possible.". As it stands, it's incorrect/poor English.
You had plenty of shots of all those who shoot the cameras and switch the show...but they were mundane. Everyone looked bored out of their skulls. You had one shot of a camera op sitting in a chair, well away from the camera, and in a very bored manner, holding his head on his chin, panning the camera a bit. Again, the message to me was whatever they were shooting was so boring they didn't care about it. Be more selective with those shots. Only use the good ones. In fact during the interview he was talking about the technical crew and there was a jump cut which could/should have been covered so it would not be seen.
There were some nice rack-focus moves from cameras to action during the service.
However...for a video about the service...you showed almost none unless it was in a monitor.
I want to hear that service. I want to hear the music as people sing. I want to hear the minister give some of his sermon or prayer. I want to see the joy and emotion people get by attending this service so it makes me either want to physically go to the church or, at the very least, see it online. Just a phrase here and there. Not the entire sermon. Not the entire song. Not the entire prayer. A phrase is plenty and then drop it under the voice so we can hear the voice but it dove-tails to keep us engaged and the piece flowing.
You should make a short open for these videos where you incorporate the name of the church. Key word is "short". Then go to a quality opening shot that engages me. Not a talking-head. I have yet to see an exterior shot of this church. Show me where it is. Show me people coming to church. Show me a sign outside of the church so I know if it's in West Virginia or China.
Sure, you can end with the name of the church but give me a nice "goodbye" shot too. Close with something of quality. Pretty and flattering to the subject matter you are making a video about.
These are just quick thoughts before I head off to work.
Again, I'm not trying to be mean. I simply tend to get to the point as quickly as possible.
It also helps me keep the message clear.
Use natural sound more and show me ( see AND hear) the people enjoying the service! ;)
Tim Lewis February 4th, 2014, 06:57 PM John, thanks for those comments. I know they are referring to Brock's video specifically, but there are some real pearls in there that I can take and apply for my work too. Thanks for taking the time to share your knowledge.
Brock Burwell February 5th, 2014, 12:08 PM Great advice John! I really appreciate it.
At the current time, I have nothing to shoot the "natural" sound of the church except the mic in my T3i. I have some laviers, but no shotgun at the moment. Would the camera audio be alright for that?
Loved the advice on opening with shots of the church or the service with natural audio then fading into the actual talking head. Good stuff.
I will make sure to take the shot out of the guy looking bored sitting back moving the camera. I should have known better than that.
I have since corrected the grammer and the jump cut that wasn't hidden. Thanks
All the advice was great. Really means a lot that you took time to watch and give me suggestions. It really is helping me become better at this. I appreciate it!
John DuMontelle February 5th, 2014, 12:51 PM A nice slow, paperwork day for me.
I really appreciate you taking my comments in the tone intended.
The last thing I want to do is sound arrogant, offensive or just plain grumpy.
I also use a T3i as a second lockdown camera on some of my shoots.
I know what you mean about the audio. It's there, but...
I bought a cheap DSLR mic like this for my Canon T3i which I use from time to time.
New Video Shotgun Mic Stereo Microphone for Nikon Canon DSLR Camera DV Camcorder | eBay (http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-Video-Shotgun-Mic-Stereo-Microphone-For-Nikon-Canon-DSLR-Camera-DV-Camcorder-/190930895576?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item2c745e42d8)
Just do a search for "dslr mic" on ebay and you'll find something to fit your budget.
Big or small.
At this time...you don't need to spend big bucks on that for your T3i...yet.
It didn't kill my wallet and was much cheaper than buying a stand alone audio recorder like a Zoom to try and synch audio to video later.
I'm a "keep it simple" kind of guy.
Spend money for the best quality possible...but balance that by always asking myself...is this item a "need" or a "want"?
I try and stick to "need" as often as possible.
You could probably get by with using the internal, built-in mic the camera has for the nat sound...if you're close enough to the audio source.
But an external DSLR mic is a lot better than the built-in camera mic on the Canon.
Frankly, what does impress me about your work is the consistent level of quality.
That's very important.
From there you build that level slowly and continue to maintain it throughout the finished product.
None of us ever stops trying to raise that "consistent level of quality" bar no matter how long we've been in the business.
I can not stress enough that too often, and I do NOT direct this comment at you and your work, people shooting video get all caught up in the video image and completely ignore the need for nice clean, quality audio.
To me that's just as important as making sure you've got good color balance and focus in your images.
Your audio quality on the interviews was good.
Try to expand your efforts with audio.
Remember a mic mounted on the camera can pick up the sound of your hand moving on the camera body...which is why some will spend even more money on a DSLR mic that has better mic suspension than lesser priced mics like I linked to.
Do what you can to record clean natural sound and then incorporate it more often in your final product.
There's a reason they offer you more than one track of audio to record to while shooting and editing! ;)
Keep up the good work!
Brock Burwell February 5th, 2014, 01:27 PM Thanks a lot.
Having just started I'm really not sure what all I need, but I have a good start with some of the tripods, lights and mics I have. I guess I am now realizing a shotgun mic will be imporant to these videos. The one you posted is very cheap and I may actually order that today. It'll be a big upgrade from my the internal mic I'm sure. Thanks!
You say you are impressed with the consistent quality of my work. Can you elaborate on that? It may seem like I'm fishing for compliments, but I don't mean it to sound that way. I am always trying to figure out what I'm doing right and wrong and this may give me an idea of what I practices I'm doing that I need to keep instead of changing.
Also one more question. I was curious where you get your music from? There are places that may charge $1 a song with most of the tracks being a bit lower quality and places, like premium beat, where they charge $40 a track. Where do you find your music? I don't mind paying $40 for a song, but I'm not currently getting paid for these jobs so I need to find places that have cheap music lol.
Brock Burwell February 5th, 2014, 01:39 PM Also, the reason for this thread was to talk about my first shoot for someone outside my church.
Well it had to get cancelled because of the amount of snow that came the night before. Going to make it up maybe next month.
So this Saturday I'm going to be shooting a video on our "Praise Team" (the musicians and singers in our church). Gonna make it with the same type of formula (interviews/b-roll) unless you guys had any other ideas.
I probably do need to get that shotgun mic as I do want audio of them singing. I probably will try to order that tonight.
John DuMontelle February 5th, 2014, 02:00 PM Music...
I have all three of the Music Box collection from Digital Juice.
Music & Sound FX by Digital Juice (http://www.digitaljuice.com/products/categories.asp?cid=5)
All royalty free and the best part for me is each "song" is made so you can delete different tracks so the same song can actually sound a little different.
Don't want drums? Delete them and use song without them.
It might be a bit pricey for you...but that's what I use mostly.
I did get music from the guy.
http://www.facebook.com/TheSoundTraxxMusicLibrary
Just straight songs but I liked the quality selection and the price was great.
He even offers some for free.
Your shots were all steady.
Not a mish-mash of hand-held and tripod shots.
There are times to go hand-held and there are times for rock steady.
If I had to offer a suggestion on this part of your work...try to shoot more sequences.
Wide, medium and tight of the same action. Then edit them together.
Example.
Wide shot of guy who switches your church show.
Medium shot of his hands on switcher...or whatever he touches to change the shots from different cameras.
Tight shot of his eyes watching monitors.
Medium shot over his shoulder of the monitors he's looking at.
You can do that with a lot of situations.
Wide shot of camera man shooting service.
Medium shot of his hand on the lens.
...I think you get the idea.
Now it'a all about practice and playing with how you sequence it in editing.
Much better than single shots with constantly changing subject matter...though there are times you have to do that too.
Watch tv commercials. Turn the sound down and see how they sequence their shots to send a message.
Do the same thing with your favorite tv show.
See how the shoot and sequence shots to tell a story.
Now you try to do the same...but with good audio! ;)
Last thought for the moment....
When you shoot...always ask yourself...how would the average person told to shoot a shot of what you want to shoot do it.
They'd stand there with the camera, probably hand held, and squeeze off a wide shot.
Now, every time, instead of doing that, take one or more extra steps to make your shot better.
You're basically competing with yourself in your head to do better.
Thinking of how it should be done...then taking that extra step...or two...to make your shot better than the average person.
Don't always shoot from the same level.
Shoot low angle.
Think about foreground...and use it to enhance your images.
Every image is more than just the main subject.
There's the subject of the image.
The background.
The foreground...if any.
Sometimes you may want to work to make sure there IS foreground to deal with in the shot.
Maybe the leaves of the trees outside used as foreground to frame the top of the church...or a flag.
Consider all three...foreground, background and subject every time you compose a shot.
Not just the subject of the image alone.
By the way...that Digital Juice site...
Digital Juice - The Best Products and Prices for Video & Graphics Professionals (http://www.digitaljuice.com)
...is one of many places you can buy extra stuff to help make your edited product look better.
But...wait for sales. They run a lot of them and if you're patient...you can get them much cheaper than the list price. Plus watching their tutorials of their products can give you ideas...even if you never buy a product from them.
I get stuff from them because they are not far from Miami, but I've been very happy with their products.
Got to go...hope this helps.
Brock Burwell February 5th, 2014, 02:14 PM Again, amazing advice.
I'll look into the Digital Juice music collection. Looks pretty good.
Love the suggestion of having a competition with the "average" person. That is very good advice.
Thanks for everything! You are awesome!
John DuMontelle February 5th, 2014, 04:13 PM Thanks for the kind words Brock.
I forgot to add one thing on the subject of music.
Don't overlook the music right in front of you.
It's a church.
They must have a choir...or some kind of music.
Shoot a choir practice.
A few hymns as the choir or audience sings.
Tell the folks you're NOT doing it for video of their faces...though they may go for that...and that could be good too.
You're just going for good clean music.
Make sure it's a complete song from first note to last.
Try using that sometime for a music bed.
It may not work for every piece you do...but the price is right and it's "real".
Right from the place you are trying to profile with your videos.
Then, when you use it, do your best to back-time the music so it ends at the very end of your edited piece.
Be sure to keep all of your raw video, even after you've used it to edit a finished product.
That archive can come in handy in the future and help you turn out more projects faster without having to re-shoot. There's nothing wrong reusing a shot in a future product...or have a shot that didn't work before...but now it does.
Just something to think about. :)
See you around!
Tim Lewis February 5th, 2014, 06:36 PM Thanks for all that info as well, John. There used to be an online course that the BBC had on camera techniques that covered a lot of that, but unfortunately they took it down. Sound Traxx looks good.
John DuMontelle February 6th, 2014, 08:08 AM Just my way of helping others with their own "journey" as others helped me...too long ago for me to admit.
It's one reason I really like dvinfo.net.
There are a lot of quality people here who help when they can.
Wanted to do my little part in that effort. ;)
Brock Burwell March 5th, 2014, 04:50 PM This is what I have as my "finished product."
I know I didn't do all the advice that was given here, though I plan on using that advice for future videos. I just needed to get this one finished so I can move forward with a couple other projects. What do you think? Better?
The Open Door Broadcast/TV Ministry on Vimeo
Jody Arnott March 6th, 2014, 02:26 AM I haven't been involved with this thread, but my 2c anyway...
I personally think it's great. Good audio, perfect music choice, on-screen graphics work well. My only tiny criticism would be the framing in the interview is a little off, he's a bit too far off the right-hand side of the frame for my liking (just my opinion). But the eye-line looks good.
Also did you zoom into the frame in post? The CU looks a little blurry.
But otherwise, really great work for your first real shoot :)
Brock Burwell March 8th, 2014, 10:00 PM OK So I finally got around to filming this video for my uncles auction house. I think I got everything I needed, but I had one hiccup.
I filmed his interview in the place where his auction is. It has metal roofs, cement floor and nothing to "absorb" the sound. Anyway, once I completed the interview I took it to my computer to test the audio (I had forgotten my headphones at home) and it sounded very echoey. Basically unusable.
So I reinterviewed him in a different location (in his home). Once I got home and on my home speakers and not listening through iPhone headphones, I realized that the audio was perfect in the original interview. So I have two interviews of him, which isn't bad, but he is wearing the same shirt and hat in both. I would like to use footage from both interviews, but I don't know if that is acceptable to have him in two different locations wearing the same shirt and hat in a 3 minute video. I can probably get by with just using the original footage, but he said a few cool things in the second interview. I don't know is proper in this situation. What do you think?
John Nantz March 8th, 2014, 10:32 PM For an auction video - Going once! ..... Going twice! ....
A thought about John's suggestion:
Something else...think about what will be your opening and closing shot BEFORE you get to the point you want to edit. Do it while you're on the shoot and make them BOTH good. A good open and close shot are the bookends that set the tone for the entire story and make or break a quality product.
It appears the video may be be for an advertising spot, or something on his business web site?
One thought I'd have is to open with a shot of the business followed by a shot of the auctioneer rattling off the beginning of the auction - not the description of the item but, say, as the bid is being ante'd up.
The shot of the business should have the audio of the auctioneer and then it segues into the auctioneer clip. At this point, your uncle's interview kicks in.
During the course of the interview, at some break point, go back to the auctioneer as he is a little further along in the bid process. A shot of the auctioneer and another shot of the audience/bidders, total maybe only 3 seconds.
Back to the Uncle interview.
End with the last bid, then " going once, going twice, SOLD!"
Another shot of the business with a bit of the auctioneering in the audio and fade out.
The beginning and ending could be reused on future ads.
In the course of the 2 or three minutes, maybe one could revisit the auction twice instead of once.
I remember a song called, I think, "The Auctioneer".
Sounds like fun!
|
|