View Full Version : Sony RX10 point-and-shoot camera
Dave Blackhurst December 13th, 2013, 06:51 AM This is where the RX10 is a bit of "luck" - it comes out of the STILL camera division, and I think most would say that as a STILL camera, it's a tad spendy.... but it's looking to be a very capable VIDEO camera, having extensive video oriented features.
It's a bit of an oddity, as arguably it's at least, if not MORE capable in many respects as any of the "consumer" Sony video cams, and holds up nicely against their "pro" lines feature wise. The list of "missing" features is pretty short, and this will be my next "video" camera, with the bonus of excellent stills. There are still a couple "dedicated" video features that would be nice - no clip limit, I like touchscreen controls... and hmmm, how about a LANC port, just because it would come in handy sometimes... unless an "app" would cover that ground!
I know that internet legend is that manufacturers deliberately cripple products so they can sell more product next year, but honestly there are plenty of other factors at work here, it's not a conspiracy...
It takes time to develop and then fine tune sensors and processors, manufacturing techniques, etc... so sometimes a product needs to ship while that process still has room to mature. Another 6-12 months, and they can and do refine the hardware and the software. And yes, they do have to consider that "next years model" needs to have some compelling reason to impress potential buyers, AND better performance/specs.
There are marketing considerations - what the vast majority of the market "expects" is different from what some of us on the bleeding edge might want/expect/dream of. Giving a laundry list of features that causes the buyers eyes to glaze over doesn't sell product. Implementing obscure features that appeal to a limited market may actually create other problems...
There are limits to how complex you can make a product for the CONSUMER market - having dealt recently with a return on a camera I sold because of USER MALFUNCTION, I can only imagine the nightmare manufacturers deal with. With complex electronics, you'd be surprised how badly a user can foul things up due to lack of knowledge, or just doing something "dumb". Look at how early video samples from the RX10 were generally bad, because still shooters with limited video experience shot "bad" samples - there you go... experienced video shooters seem to be finding the RX10 to be quite the new toy, with a little time to figure out settings and such.
I do hope Sony will open up access to "tweaking" features, but as someone who likes to "tinker", I'll have to say this is something a manufacturer must be EXTREMELY careful with - if a "hack" or "mod" fries or bricks a camera, who pays the bill... the guy who pushed it too hard, or the manufacturer that provided access to "hack/mod/tweak"? If your camera is no longer 100% stable (lets say it's 90%+), but does some nifty new things, will you be happy? If you buy a camera expecting it to work a certain way with your "smart" phone only to discover your phone isn't quite smart enough unless you upgrade to the newest version... will the manufacturer be blamed? I know I've fiddled with the RX100M2 and my "smart" phone, but it appears my "last years" Android phone ain't so bright...
My only question when looking at a "tool", is will it do the job and justify the investment... the RX100 proved it's worth, the M2 version is a decent upgrade, and the RX10 ticks so many boxes, it's almost a no-brainer for me. Haven't had a camera yet that didn't have room for improvement SOMEWHERE, but I'm liking the current Sony design philosophy exhibited in the RX series.
James Manford December 13th, 2013, 06:56 AM There are limits to how complex you can make a product for the CONSUMER market - having dealt recently with a return on a camera I sold because of USER MALFUNCTION, I can only imagine the nightmare manufacturers deal with.
Completely agree with this. The buyer of my VG20 that I sold pre-owned claimed the camcorder wasn't recording properly. It was actually a codec issue on his computer as it worked fine when it was returned back to me, but by then I had already incurred costs accepting a return (wasted £35 on postage via Special Delivery w/ Insurance etc).
But I can only imagine the costs manufacturers must incur due to consumers lack of knowledge.
Maurizio Panella December 13th, 2013, 08:21 AM Hi all,
I'm thinking to sell my EX1r for my weddings video because is too heavy for me
I'm interested in Sony NEX-EA50, the new HXR-NX3, but even in this RX10
I need to know how I can adjust the iris and focus and if there is a manual/auto switch
The operations are fast or complicated?
Thanks in advance and sorry for my poor english
Ron Evans December 13th, 2013, 01:00 PM Dave, I just bought one of these Sony VCT-VPR100 Remote Control Tripod VCTVPR100 B&H Photo Video Sony tripods that has 4 cables to control Sony cameras. Maybe one of the ports on the RX10 can be controlled by this tripod ?
Ron Evans
Ron Evans December 13th, 2013, 02:47 PM Just had a look at the pdf for the RX10 and it has a Micro USB terminal compatible with Multi terminal devices !!! Would that include the tripod I mentioned above ? The tripod came with a micro USB cable labeled multi !!
Ron Evans
Dave Blackhurst December 13th, 2013, 03:54 PM Hmmm, the mysterious new "multi-interface" interface....going to have to start looking into that more closely... offhand it looks like it may well be possible to "hack in" on that USB port... or the new MI shoe... or both... That tripod description certainly implies it is there.
Darn Sony and their "undocumented" features - shades of the A/V jack that was so interesting to hack a while back before Sony released any compatible LANC remotes! I stumbled into cracking the code by reverse engineering a sport pack underwater shell... Sony US product support had no idea the functionality was even there, but it was in the service manuals...
Now to go figure out where to get service manuals!? Those usually document the pinouts, and you find out all the fun stuff that's hidden under the hood! I'd be happy with something akin to the tiny RMAV remotes - on/off, start/stop, zoom, and photo... sounds like there could easily be one in the future!
Right now I just have to wrestle with my aversion to paying "retail" and pull the trigger on an RX10 - I was so hoping that there would be a flood of these "lightly used" from people who would be "disappointed" when they couldn't figure out how to use the camera...
Paul Rickford December 14th, 2013, 02:34 AM Yes Ron your tripod will control the functions through the multi terminal, I'm using remote commander RM-VPR1 which clips to my tripod with the RX10.
If you have any of the old handycam AV/R accessories, there is a multi adapter VMC-AVM1.
The hot shoe is multi interface so the handycam Video light HVL-LE1 and Stereo mic ECM-EYST1m work.
Very useful for me for my travels that I can use the same accessories both from the VG30 and Rx100 and CX cams, there is even a new battery charger that will charge V,W and M batteries BC-QM1.
very neat.
Dave Blackhurst December 14th, 2013, 02:55 AM Thanks Paul for those model #'s! The remote and charger will go onto the wish list immediately! With that remote, the RX10 becomes that much more useful for video!
Mark Williams December 14th, 2013, 09:17 AM Does the remote commander RM-VPR1 allow for variable speed zoom with the RX10? Can a "creep" speed be achieved and if so is it smooth?
Darren Levine December 14th, 2013, 09:46 AM this new multi port has to be one of the most disregarded changes sony made. from some reports, it's just a replacement/change to the D connector they usually use, and just carrys the pins for a/v and lanc, which is fine, but there is seemingly no adapter out there to to get at the lanc....
if these reports are accurate, then a cable like this but for the new port is what's needed to use a regular lanc controller:
Libec LANC/AV Adapter Cable for Sony Handycam Cameras A-3AV B&H
but i've dug around and if such a cable exists, it's been hidden under 6 feet of dirt.
Darren Levine December 14th, 2013, 10:00 AM more digging found this thread, talking about it. the connector is a sony proprietary modification of usb micro, Facilitating intervalometers/computer control for NEX line: Sony Alpha/NEX E-mount Talk Forum: Digital Photography Review (http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3586905#forum-post-52659660)
how nice of them to make things difficult
Paul Rickford December 14th, 2013, 10:36 AM Does the remote commander RM-VPR1 allow for variable speed zoom with the RX10? Can a "creep" speed be achieved and if so is it smooth?
No set speeds, with the RX10 if you lightly press you can get a slightly slower even zoom(about 70%)
Dave Blackhurst December 14th, 2013, 03:40 PM @Darrin -
Yep, it looks like it's just a modification of the A/V jack implementation, just using unused pins of the micro USB, which is now a "standardized" connector - I heard from one source this was a "legislated" change so that we don't have so many proprietary USB chargers in landfills... now my phones ALL use it, and all the newer Sony cameras.
I don't see anything "difficult", other than the reverse engineering required to figure out pins and if they still use a "trigger" signal for various functions as the LANC on A/V did. It actually makes sense for Sony to finally avoid OVERLY proprietary standards - if you can charge your camera in an emergency with a phone charger, that could come in handy... and if there are a few "spare" pins not dedicated to any other functions, why not design in some more features!?
Your link was for the I/R, which is yet another "input" - previously you had A/V jack, AiShoe, and the I/R remote, now you have Micro USB, MiShoe and I/R - just changes of connectors really, and while "inconvenient", and I suppose a bit expensive if you have to buy all new remotes/etc., I'm actually pleased that the stuff is already available "off the shelf". And if the Sony community expands, as it no doubt will with the three innovative cameras just released, there WILL be more "hacker" interest, and probably more options!
I Googled the model #'s Paul provided, plenty of "hits", including the cable to adapt from A/V (so the RMAV I have would adapt, for instance) to the MicroUSB. Debating the "best" option for that... vs. the "new" remote. Either way, having a remote option for RX series cameras makes them that much closer to replacing video cams for many shooting scenarios. The RX10 will be more generally useful to me than a video camera, but I still see the slot for a PJ series in the "fleet", at least for now... though it just dropped a little farther!
Many moons ago I dreamed of having just a couple cameras to cover all the angles... this of course leads to a camera COLLECTION and a case of GAS, as you find different cameras are needed to do different things... the RX10 comes much closer to covering most of the scenarios and looks like it will cover them fairly well, so much of my thought right now is focused on... which cameras can be "re-homed" rather than sitting on the shelf!?
Bill Bruner December 14th, 2013, 05:54 PM ...Right now I just have to wrestle with my aversion to paying "retail" and pull the trigger on an RX10 - I was so hoping that there would be a flood of these "lightly used" from people who would be "disappointed" when they couldn't figure out how to use the camera...
Hi Dave - as of this post, there are five "lightly used" units at Amazon Warehouse Deals for $1195.07 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00FRHTSMW?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=B00FRHTSMW&linkCode=xm2&tag=din0a-20).
Good luck and best of the holidays!
Bill
Hybrid Camera Revolution (http://hybridcamerarevolution.blogspot.com)
Leon Kolenda December 16th, 2013, 12:47 AM I really like this camera, I'm thinking serious about getting it. There is on thing that is holding me back, I want to know if this camera overheats at all, when recording to the 29 minute limit, The limit I can handle, but the overheating, No Way! I had Sony's Nex-7, nice video, but hughe problem with overheating, especially being erratic. In some ways I cant believe I'm thinking if buying another Sony camera.
More than one test would be great to know.
Darren Levine December 20th, 2013, 03:05 PM so it's confirmed that these are actually brand new, i just got mine and even called just to ask them about it, lady claimed since they ran out of open box, they sent me a new one instead. invoice even shows new SKU. similar reports from others as well on this deal. if you were waiting for an RX10 on sale, i doubt we'll see this low for a long while:
$937
Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-RX10 Digital Camera, Black - Open Box DSC-RX10/B OB (http://adorama.evyy.net/c/78693/111874/1036)
Barry Goyette December 20th, 2013, 03:17 PM I ordered my RX10 yesterday and apparently a $300 rebate just showed up in the dealer system, even though it hasn't been "announced" yet. Perhaps the "torn" open box deal is how adorama is "not" advertising it.
Barry
Darren Levine December 20th, 2013, 03:27 PM interesting! what retailer was that?
Phil Goetz December 22nd, 2013, 09:28 PM Shot some hand held wide with image stabilization turned on:
Goetz Tests: Sony DSC-RX10 December 2013 - YouTube
Did a rambling voice over about features / benefits.
Ron Evans December 22nd, 2013, 11:34 PM This looks like it is set up for control of the camera Shooting Grip with Mini Tripod - Action Cam Accessories Sony Store - Sony CA (http://store.sony.ca/shooting-grip-with-mini-tripod-zid31-GPVPT1/cat-31-catid-All-Action-Cam?_t=pfm%3Dapr)
Ron Evans
John McCully December 23rd, 2013, 12:26 AM Shot some hand held wide with image stabilization turned on:
Thanks for that Phil; the active stabilization works quite well.
I have a question; why did you choose 24p rather than 60p for that kind of shoot. The stutter was too pronounced and annoying, I thought, especially when you panned as you did, a lot. Kind of defeats the purpose of active stabilization I would have thought.
Cheers...
Paul Rickford December 23rd, 2013, 02:55 AM This looks like it is set up for control of the camera Shooting Grip with Mini Tripod - Action Cam Accessories Sony Store - Sony CA (http://store.sony.ca/shooting-grip-with-mini-tripod-zid31-GPVPT1/cat-31-catid-All-Action-Cam?_t=pfm%3Dapr)
Ron Evans
I have the D plug version of this which was made for the CX cams. It works, but unless Sony has used stronger materials for the multi version it has a lot of flex, it only has 4 set clicks for angle and as this was designed for flat based handycams with the weight towards the back of the bracket the RX10 topples if you set it flat to use as a tripod.
You may find it usefull only for hand holding 'steadycam' shots
Paul Rickford
Jeff Harper January 13th, 2014, 08:56 AM In the market for this cam...anyone knows of an open box, etc., please post or message me! Thanks!
Rich Adrion January 27th, 2014, 06:32 AM Do any of you have any wedding footage shot with this camera posted online? Most of the demos I have seen online have been of outdoor scenery and not really concentrated on people. I would love to see some professionally shot indoor wedding footage from the camera so I could gauge how much better it is than my Sony EX1.
Noa Put January 31st, 2014, 07:27 PM I have some rx10 footage from the last wedding I did last year (end december) and will start editing it in a week, if you want I can share some footage through a password protected link?
John McCully February 2nd, 2014, 01:46 AM Noa, yes, please, I for one would like to see a sample of your footage. I would also appreciate your comments regarding your overall assessment of the camera not just for wedding work but as a general purpose machine compared say to your GH3.
I might add that thus far I am more than delighted with the RX10 for just fooling around, the birds and the bees, landscapes, trains and rain, cats and dogs and the like. As a photographic tool I find it not too shabby too.
To answer your question; yes please; I want.
Dave Blackhurst February 2nd, 2014, 05:48 PM Got to take the RX10 out on a day hike... nothing "special", but used it mostly for stills, and a couple little clips. Got to say I'm very happy with the results. 86 shots/clips, only a couple slightly out of focus (through glass shots are always tricky!), and the rest are solid "keepers"... I don't usually shoot a lot, but I kept seeing good shots, and even better results on the LCD, this is a very addictive camera to shoot with.
Viewfinder was nice for outdoor shooting, although the articulating LCD made a few shots easier too.
Circular Polarizer was mounted and used, at least some of the time. Had to take it off for some shots where it picked up more glare... a couple extra layers of glass can do that. Fill flash from the pop-up was handy in a couple backlit "people" shots, and was powerful enough to do the trick.
The surprise was a full digital zoom (yeah, I leave that turned on, I can see the level of zoom in the display and decide whether I can live with the consequences!) shot of a hawk on a distant rock - so small we weren't sure if there was something there or not... actually got a couple "usable" shots where you can see the eye/head position and some detail... doesn't look "bad" at all, probably better than the average pocket camera at "normal" distances!
The video clips were just for giggles, not worth sharing, but I think it's time to do a couple controlled shots against the 7xx series Handycam... I have a "feeling" the footage is better, but it could be just the fun of the "new toy".
It's nice to feel very confident that the camera will "get the shot", and get it well. The RX100 and the Mk2 have been my "go to" carry around cameras, but of course are limited by the short zoom and aperture ramp (not like those were a "big" deal in a pocket rocket, an HX300 covered the gap when called upon). The RX10 is bigger and heavier, but still portable, and now has a small sling bag with the RX100M2 snuck in behind it, and a selection of batteries and accessories, so that's the bag that will be "handy"...
Time to go look at bigger memory cards and hard drives!
Jim Giberti February 2nd, 2014, 07:27 PM I shot the RX10 on a series of scenes for an image/promo piece last week.
It featured a 2 horse sleigh in brilliant sun and deep snow.
It was a quick decision and I had to use the EVF, which frankly, on a day like that, was pretty ineffective.
After the first several shots, I did something else I've never done and switched it to autofocus.
Bottom line is the footage is pretty impressive, great detail, zero moire even with a number of actors and fabrics and motion.
The lens range and IQ was just great as is it's being the only camera that allows for one button slow motion on the fly with the ability to get right back to 24p 50fps with one touch.
Another notable plus is how well the lens handles flare...like better than almost any lenses I've shot.
Overall, because of the comprehensive R&G features, we got a lot more, clean, quality footage than I'd expect with any other small camera, including the C100 (given the 60p).
I shoot Natural -3 -3 -3 and start with a Filnconvert grade to match my other cameras (in this case the BMPCC for the close-ups)
When I got back from that location I immediately rigged the RX10 with a magnetic plate and the Kinotehnik LCDVF BM and now it functions like a real video camera, by far the best you'll use for any where near this price. IMO, for this type of work, with the LCDVF, the RX10 might be the best R&G camera out there.
Werner Graf February 3rd, 2014, 02:28 AM I am very happy what is coming out with this little Gem..
Last saturday I was at a great concert and filmed for pure pleasure with one of my 2 RX 10.
Movie Mode 1080 50p. I like to ability to change the gain with the extra Dial "audience and the couple".
Handsfree 5000 ISO Tungsten VIVID Color I was taking photos and forgot to go back to Natural. In FCP X I reduced the Color and Contrast, EQ on Sound, Video Stabilized.The Automatic is very smooth and als good exposure, no pumping from the AF. A Canon 70 D has much more noise above 400 ISO. Bought two while so relatively cheap, for Interview Situation I will use one for a closer framing and can intercut.
Close up zoomed in the AF has some issues, just zoom back and in again I bought 2 Tiffen Ultracontrast Filters 1/2 and 3 need soon a 2 as good compromiss. A number 2 whould be good also for the CANON DSLR's wich crushed the blacks. The Ultracons lift the blacks...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1WCC6BIutc&feature=youtu.be
Werner Graf February 3rd, 2014, 04:24 AM Youtube always change colors and Contrast...
Rich Adrion February 3rd, 2014, 06:53 AM I have some rx10 footage from the last wedding I did last year (end december) and will start editing it in a week, if you want I can share some footage through a password protected link?
Sure that would be great
Thanks
Jeff Harper February 3rd, 2014, 09:36 AM Very excited this camera will be my next purchase. Thanks for your reports, everyone.
Phil Goetz February 3rd, 2014, 02:49 PM Which DVINFO sponsor are you considering ordering from? wink wink...
Cliff Totten February 3rd, 2014, 09:14 PM Just got my new RX10 last week.
I was originally expecting to have a nice "all in one" camera for vacations. Something that took "good" photos and shot "good" video. After spending a day with this camera, I realized that I completely underestimated the image quality and complete functionality of the RX10. In fact, I became downright shocked at how much better this camera actually was, compared to my original expectations.
The good:
The build quality is superb. It's magnesium body feels great in your hands. (close your eyes and it feels like a baby A99)
The lens is fast, bright and very sharp from corner to corner at all lengths. The constant f2.8 is sweet. I also LOVE having an aperture ring on a small camera like this.
You can configure features to your hearts content. The function button brings up two rows of user programmable icons to control most of the functions you could ever want.
Manual audio level control, great meters and headphone monitoring.
Full and seperate manual control of ISO, shutter speed and Iris. No "Handycam/NX30" crippling tricks!
Full scan sensor and scalling...no line skipping = VERY sharp video. (look at slashcam.com's resolution charts...it will shock you)
Clean 8bit 4:2:2 HDMI out for external recording.
Perfect lens to sensor optical match up.
Great image processing and excellent noise reduction
The not so good:
Lens zoom is not variable. It's a smooth slow crawl. (the way I like it anyway but having variable speeds would have been nice)
29 minute recording time. Yeah,..they all have it and we all know why. (I still hate it though)
"OK" image stabilization. Optical-only provides best resolution. Adding "active" mode will lower resolution slightly.
AVCHD Codec. This one baffles me. Sony has no problem making a great h.264 chipset on their FS100. The AVCHD standard generally is pretty damn good considering it's 8bit 4:2:0 limitation. The FS100 is especially durable and tough. The RX10 does NOT have this Sony FS100 chipset. In fact, it's surprisingly bad. Here is what I have seen so far. When recording internally with AVCHD 60p and recording externally with prores at 30p...with slow moving scenes and even moderate moving scenes, both recordings look similar. However, if something moves quickly, the AVCHD will suddenly "soften" and in some cases even block up badly. The HDMI ProRes will NOT disply these problems. These same frames are sharp and clean. Also, the internal AVCHD dosn't hold the blacks well. Even light grading on the shadows can uncover compression noise in the blacks. (nothing at all like the FS100's ability to hold it's quality in shadows) Again, ProRes from the RX10 (Atomos Samurai Blade) is much better quality.
Now,...let me say the the RX10's codec isn't "that" bad. Allot of the motion problems are seen mostly in a "frame by frame" viewing. When watching it in real time, it's fairly well covered up. And again, most scenes with slow to moderate motion are OK. Also, I noticed that 24p AVCHD is far less likely to break down like the 60p does. I fail to understand why Sony allowed this to happen. Did they play with the long GOP structure? Was this a mistake or intentional?
All in all,....it's a damn good camera. I'm very happy with 95% of it and still surprised at how good the over all package is. (now if it just did 4K!!!)
CT
Jeff Harper February 4th, 2014, 07:25 AM @Phil, looking at open box deals from Amazon, but I would love to buy from one of our great sponsors!
Cliff, your report seems very consistent with most everyone else! The 29 minute limit and the slow zoom both bother me as well. With nothing else quite like it, it's the only game in town in it's price range. I wonder how a product like this will affect other manufacturers. I imagine in a short while something even MORE amazing will be released. Now that Sony and Panasonic have both released contstant F/2.8 bridge cameras I can't wait to see what's coming too the world of regular video cameras. I have believed for a long time that prosumer/low end pro video cameras with faster zoom lenses were possible, this product only confirms it.
Thanks for sharing!
Bill Bruner February 4th, 2014, 07:56 AM I've been very interested in the RX10 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00FRHTSMW?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=B00FRHTSMW&linkCode=xm2&tag=din0a-20) as a replacement for my old Panasonic TM900 (and maybe my GH3), so I rented an RX10 from borrowlenses a few weeks ago, but I didn't like the 28mbps AVCHD compression and I couldn't bring myself to buy a camera with a 30 minute limit, so I'm waiting for the Sony CX900 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00HNJWVNK?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=B00HNJWVNK&linkCode=xm2&tag=din0a-20) to ship in March.
Overshadowed somewhat by the RX10 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00FRHTSMW?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=B00FRHTSMW&linkCode=xm2&tag=din0a-20) and the simultaneous release of the 4K AX100 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00HNJWVIA?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=B00HNJWVIA&linkCode=xm2&tag=din0a-20), the CX900 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00HNJWVNK?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=B00HNJWVNK&linkCode=xm2&tag=din0a-20) looks like it's going to be the "RX10 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00FRHTSMW?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=B00FRHTSMW&linkCode=xm2&tag=din0a-20) in a camcorder body" - with the addition of unlimited recording time, 120fps and multiple codecs (to include 50mbps XAVC-S).
I'll miss the RX10 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00FRHTSMW?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=B00FRHTSMW&linkCode=xm2&tag=din0a-20)'s 8.3x constant f2.8 lens - but a 12x optical f2.8-4.5 power zoom doesn't suck ;)
The sample video from Sony looks really good, and they even have camera movement and fast moving objects (e.g., a hang glider) in the scenes, but we'll have to see more before making a final "buy" decision:
Sample Movie for Handycam HDR-CX900 - YouTube
Best,
Bill
Hybrid Camera Revolution (http://hybridcamerarevolution.blogspot.com)
Jeff Harper February 4th, 2014, 08:32 AM The Sony has a 1" sensor! This is revolutionary for a $1500 videocamera! Thanks for confusing me Bill!
James Manford February 4th, 2014, 08:54 AM I'm liking the CX900 ... might be the perfect replacement if needed, for the CX760 I own.
Jeff Harper February 4th, 2014, 09:19 AM Will this sensor appear in a larger prosumer or low-end pro camcorder? Would be very interesting.
Cliff Totten February 4th, 2014, 09:49 AM The CX900 and the RX10 appear to have many internal similarities. (aside from the codec)
If there is one thing that drives me nuts about many "Handycams" are those goofy triangle audio meters. There are no markings for db and very few steps to judge input levels. They are not worthless, but they are very close. I'm certain this is designed to be that way ;-)
I'm sooo happy that the RX10 has "real" meters that are large and easy to measure levels.
It seems to me that the CX900 is an RX10 with much better codec and no recording limit. The CX900's lens (to me) is a downgrade though.
Jeff Harper February 4th, 2014, 09:57 AM Yeah, I agree Cliff, the whole handycam thing sucks. I despise the looks of them, but the 1" sensor and unlimited recording are so great. This is a lot of camera for the money no matter how you slice it.
I'm holding off totally, I'm completely flummoxed now. Need to see what else is happening and gather my thoughts.
I do love the Sony look always have, never liked Canon anyway. Put a shotgun mount on the CX900 and I'd pay another $500 and I'd probably be reasonably happy.
Dave Blackhurst February 4th, 2014, 01:14 PM The odds are 100% that it will get MORE "confusing"... The Bionz X is already mentioned in upcoming Alpha series cams, which means APS-C and FF sensors (with FF likely to include 4K based on the rumors).
Sony WILL release more cameras with this sensor and/or processor - they've set a pretty high bar for any "successors", but there will be something new next year if the numerous releases for 2014 sure to come don't trip your trigger... that's the "consumer" market for ya! Next years models may be better or worse...
Considering Sony history, the odds again favor a "pro" version of one or both the AX100 and CX900 - they don't even have to shoot black plastic into the molds instead of grey! A1u based on HC1, NX70 was CX700 based, NX30 is based on the PJ760, FX1/Z1U, FX7/V1U, etc... again, the odds virtually guarantee a "pro" version of the AX100! There are some skips in the lineage because Pro lines don't refresh at the same crazy rate that consumer lines do (3-5 years vs. annual), but since the AX100 clearly replaces the top of the consumer line, it's a virtual lock to appear with "NX" or other "pro" badging.
All that aside, there's something to be said for the cam you have or can get... the RX100 rapidly became the camera I was using most of the time, the M2 version is even better with video, and is still the "compact" choice. It's not "perfect", but it's darn good... The RX10 is already a "favored choice", a "one cam" solution for most things still or video. Again, not "perfect", but it will outshoot most anything else I can grab from the camera collection... Toss in a "dedicated" video camera (AX100) to complement those two, and I can't think of too much I CAN'T do with that lot! For a list price of $4k-ish for all 3 cameras, you're talking less than ONE "pro" camera... buy used or open box, it's even less... and you get a lot of high quality shooting FUN for that, vs. one big heavy camera. "Perfect"? No, but should give a creative shooter a virtual arsenal (one that fits in a small camera bag, no less!), with quality output most people would consider to be stellar.
I don't find the slow zoom or the clip length to be THAT much of a problem in practical use, but I've shot video with still cameras long enough that the limitations aren't a big deal. Like Werner, I typically shoot multicam, so those things are easily worked around.
Matt Thomas February 4th, 2014, 01:52 PM I wish there was a work around the 30 minute limit as I would get one of these as my 3rd camera as a stationary wider shot, but having to go back to it to press record again wouldn't work for this purpose. Does the app let you control the camera remotely?
Cliff Totten February 4th, 2014, 04:23 PM HDMI recorder will allow you to bypass the 29min limitation. Plus you get a great codec as well.
Matt Thomas February 4th, 2014, 05:08 PM HDMI recorder will allow you to bypass the 29min limitation. Plus you get a great codec as well.
But wouldn't that essential make it $2000 camera? Seems to be defeating the purpose for a lower priced C-Cam.
Cliff Totten February 4th, 2014, 09:39 PM Using an external recorder is a pain, no doubt. I have an FS100, EX1r and VG20 so I already had the recorder before I got the RX10.
I wonder if the AX100 and CX900 will shoot RAW pictures like the RX10. We know it's certainly capable. We just don't know if Sony will block that feature on these Handycams.
On teh RX10, it's certainly is nice to have a smooth "iris" ring on a lens. Those little partially exposed "wheels" on many Handycams sure are fiddly. (like the ones on the VG10/20 and 30...and now the AX100/CX900)
I hate how the AX100/CX900 rings can be assigned for "focus" or "zoom",...but not "iris". hehe...they know how to "getcha" alright.
I just got an RX10 I'm going to turn right around and by an AX100 in about two months. (depending on NAB announcements)
CT
Bill Bruner February 8th, 2014, 07:47 AM [QUOTE=Matt Thomas;1830615]I wish there was a work around the 30 minute limit as I would get one of these as my 3rd camera as a stationary wider shot/QUOTE]
Hi Matt - sounds like you may want to look at the £1680.48 CX900 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00HNJWVNK?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=B00HNJWVNK&linkCode=xm2&tag=din0a-20) when it is released in April in the UK :)
Sadly, that's £770 more than the current price for the RX10 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00FRHTSMW?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=B00FRHTSMW&linkCode=xm2&tag=din0a-20) (darned EU camcorder tax).
Good luck,
Bill
Hybrid Camera Revolution (http://hybridcamerarevolution.blogspot.com)
Nigel Barker February 9th, 2014, 08:10 AM [QUOTE=Matt Thomas;1830615]I wish there was a work around the 30 minute limit as I would get one of these as my 3rd camera as a stationary wider shot/QUOTE]
Hi Matt - sounds like you may want to look at the £1680.48 CX900 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00HNJWVNK?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=B00HNJWVNK&linkCode=xm2&tag=din0a-20) when it is released in April in the UK :)
Sadly, that's £770 more than the current price for the RX10 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00FRHTSMW?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=B00FRHTSMW&linkCode=xm2&tag=din0a-20) (darned EU camcorder tax).
That "darned EU camcorder tax" is only 4.7% of wholesale import price so it hardly accounts for any significant price difference. The street price of the RX10 is about £900 so even if the 4.7% camcorder duty were levied on the retail price it would only be under £50. It's a damn shame that the camera manufacturers want to trim their prices so much that none of them are prepared to up the retails price to cover the tax & produce a proper stills/video hybrid without this 30 minute recording limit nonsense.
Rich Adrion February 18th, 2014, 05:07 PM Caught a couple of new test shots from the RX10
RX10clip2 on Vimeo
and
Oslo Central Station - a Sony RX10 test shoot on Vimeo
Jeff Harper February 21st, 2014, 08:16 PM I saw this photo at the Sony site on this page: DSC-RX10 Digital Still Camera - DSCRX10/B Review - Sony US (http://store.sony.com/dsc-rx10-digital-still-camera-zid27-DSCRX10/B/cat-27-catid-All-Cyber-shot-R-Series-Cameras?XID=O:sony%20rx10:dg_di_msnsrch:p&k_id=77e72c92-d69e-c5c8-82cd-00005013e4bd&adparam=sem73p1577481&searchdef=2443051&k_clickid=77e72c92-d69e-c5c8-82cd-00005013e4bd&affcode=1577481&002=2443051&005=24834777144&006=4185914601&009=p&011=sony%20rx10%20battery%20grip&020=2044559344)
I can't find anything like it on the web. Does anyone know about this accessory?
|
|