View Full Version : Sony PMW400 shoulder mounted XDCam


Pages : 1 [2]

Paul Cronin
April 26th, 2013, 03:44 PM
Nice Simon,

I enjoy your work. With you all the way I have never owned a CMOS that could compare to the PMW500 CCD, not even close. But I am sure there will be people who will put up specs and tell me I am wrong, fine they have their opinion. But if I could trade my C300 and all my 10 Canon L glass for my 500 and Fujinon I would do it in a second.

I WILL come visit in the near future. Have Fun with Fall in the air in OZ.

Simon Denny
April 26th, 2013, 05:24 PM
Thanks for the kind words mate. When you get here we should catchup?

Justin Molush
April 26th, 2013, 06:20 PM
And frankly, if you think you are going to find operators that can do tight follow on a ball receiver with a S35 sized sensor at full telephoto, you're kidding yourself.

Horses for courses.

2/3" is alive and well.

I read that an imagined my frustration at pulling focus on a running back at full speed coming toward me while running end zone cam in the evenings when shooting borderline wide open.

/shudder

Paul Cronin
April 26th, 2013, 08:57 PM
You will be one of the fist to know Simon when I head to OZ.

Gabor Heeres
September 9th, 2013, 07:25 AM
My pre-order for this camera is already open for some time. With an expected launchdate of august 2013 I would have loved it if Sony would have brought this PMW-400 to the European market before the IBC but it seems the're just not gonna make that. Though, B&H shows the PMW-400K in stock. Is there already someone with first experiences? Curious...

Phil Goetz
December 23rd, 2013, 10:04 AM
This camera does NOT have a waveform. Correct? I see it has a histogram.

Paul Cronin
March 25th, 2014, 02:44 PM
Now this has been a quite thread for a while. I am interested in PMW-400 owners and their experience with the camera?

Also I read, but can't find it anywhere now, that you can buy PMW-400 with a 14x lens and have OS. Is this true?

Pavel Sedlak
March 27th, 2014, 03:33 AM
...Re 500 vs 400. I always liked the image quality from the 350, there is something more organic about the 350 pictures that I prefer over the PMW-500. That's a personal choice and not everyone will agree. In terms of sensitivity, noise and dynamic range the 350 and 500 are very close and I suspect the 400 will be no different.

Interesting... I know the noise level of the PMW350 (CMOS) and PDW700 (CCD) and I personaly prefer the PDW700 quality. But I'm not an operator of these cameras so I don't know which setup was used. I also don't know the quality of PMW500.