Adrian Tan
March 23rd, 2013, 11:20 AM
I'm very curious how other people handle this problem, so any thoughts appreciated.
With Catholic weddings and some other types (for instance, Greek Orthodox), I think it's very helpful to shoot from to one side of the priest (if you're allowed), facing the audience, since, often, the couple have their back turned to the audience for most of the ceremony. This audience-facing camera then neatly captures the bride's first look, as well as the father handing the bride over, and whatever follows -- all from one nice, continuous, tripod-friendly angle.
But I think you need at least one manned camera on the other side as well, facing the altar, for lots of reasons. For instance, because the readers and the priest face towards the audience, because there might be some action where it's better to view from the audience's side, because that person has more freedom of movement to get cutaways or possibly run around to check sound, etc.
But where do you put this altar-facing camera?
Here's four possibilities I think about. But they all seem to have shortcomings.
Sketches below. Apologies for their crudeness. Unmanned wide, by the way, is usually from second level or back of church raised up high.
Example 1: The altar-facing manned camera gets the groom's first look, and the audience-facing camera gets the bride's first look. The problem then, if the cameras don't have much freedom of movement, is that there's no close-up of the bride during crucial parts!
Example 2: Mirror reverse. Now you're favouring the important person. The problems are: (1) groom's first look might be difficult; sometimes the groom even stands side-on, so you can miss the first look entirely; (2) bride's first look might be difficult, because groom and priest might block you; (3) no close-up of groom during important parts.
Example 3: Cameras diagonally opposite. You're now set up to be able to get two close-ups during the important parts. Problems are: (1) crossing the line, though presumably the audience isn't really confused by the geography, and though you could always cut to wide camera or to a cutaway before you go to the other close-up; (2) more importantly, cameras getting in each other's line of fire!
Example 4: Relocating from a groom's first look set-up to double-aisle-camera. Interesting compromise, but: (1) the shuffling time involved in relocating cameras; (2) now you're blocking the aisle for photographers and for people taking communion; (3) you're probably blocking guests' views of the action; (4) some churches have aisles that are too narrow for this configuration anyway.
Anyway, for anyone who's faced a similar problem, with three cameras, what option do you go with?
With Catholic weddings and some other types (for instance, Greek Orthodox), I think it's very helpful to shoot from to one side of the priest (if you're allowed), facing the audience, since, often, the couple have their back turned to the audience for most of the ceremony. This audience-facing camera then neatly captures the bride's first look, as well as the father handing the bride over, and whatever follows -- all from one nice, continuous, tripod-friendly angle.
But I think you need at least one manned camera on the other side as well, facing the altar, for lots of reasons. For instance, because the readers and the priest face towards the audience, because there might be some action where it's better to view from the audience's side, because that person has more freedom of movement to get cutaways or possibly run around to check sound, etc.
But where do you put this altar-facing camera?
Here's four possibilities I think about. But they all seem to have shortcomings.
Sketches below. Apologies for their crudeness. Unmanned wide, by the way, is usually from second level or back of church raised up high.
Example 1: The altar-facing manned camera gets the groom's first look, and the audience-facing camera gets the bride's first look. The problem then, if the cameras don't have much freedom of movement, is that there's no close-up of the bride during crucial parts!
Example 2: Mirror reverse. Now you're favouring the important person. The problems are: (1) groom's first look might be difficult; sometimes the groom even stands side-on, so you can miss the first look entirely; (2) bride's first look might be difficult, because groom and priest might block you; (3) no close-up of groom during important parts.
Example 3: Cameras diagonally opposite. You're now set up to be able to get two close-ups during the important parts. Problems are: (1) crossing the line, though presumably the audience isn't really confused by the geography, and though you could always cut to wide camera or to a cutaway before you go to the other close-up; (2) more importantly, cameras getting in each other's line of fire!
Example 4: Relocating from a groom's first look set-up to double-aisle-camera. Interesting compromise, but: (1) the shuffling time involved in relocating cameras; (2) now you're blocking the aisle for photographers and for people taking communion; (3) you're probably blocking guests' views of the action; (4) some churches have aisles that are too narrow for this configuration anyway.
Anyway, for anyone who's faced a similar problem, with three cameras, what option do you go with?