Petter Flink
February 26th, 2013, 09:54 AM
This is one of those nightmarish what camera to choose...
Long story short. I got the HM100 a while back, loved it for the simple workflow on mac, world-framerates cheap media, size etc. Disliked it for missing interval recording, iris, remote, few user buttons, small screen, low light and too narrow on the wide side.
The HM150 even though a couple of years old would give me most of these things and in a weak moment I put it up for sale, got more then I bought it for(!) and sold it. :)
So now I'm without camera and asked for a few qoutes on the HM150 and I got some nice ones.
At the same time I've been looking at the XF100 and it sure seems to be a nice camera. But the workflow is not as fast at all, CF-media is way more expensive though the 50Mbit 422 and low light including IR/night shot and larger monitor is great.
The XA-10 and NX30 are impressive for their small size as well but I hate having to use the screen to set or change settings all the time.
How would you weight a smoother workflow and familiarity of the HM150 against the XF100s better features but higher price?
The XF100 is almost $1000 more then the HM150 in Europe. And another $800 to get it patched to do all framerates. :/
On top of this I'm sensing that JVC might be about to release a HM150 replacement soon.
Long story short. I got the HM100 a while back, loved it for the simple workflow on mac, world-framerates cheap media, size etc. Disliked it for missing interval recording, iris, remote, few user buttons, small screen, low light and too narrow on the wide side.
The HM150 even though a couple of years old would give me most of these things and in a weak moment I put it up for sale, got more then I bought it for(!) and sold it. :)
So now I'm without camera and asked for a few qoutes on the HM150 and I got some nice ones.
At the same time I've been looking at the XF100 and it sure seems to be a nice camera. But the workflow is not as fast at all, CF-media is way more expensive though the 50Mbit 422 and low light including IR/night shot and larger monitor is great.
The XA-10 and NX30 are impressive for their small size as well but I hate having to use the screen to set or change settings all the time.
How would you weight a smoother workflow and familiarity of the HM150 against the XF100s better features but higher price?
The XF100 is almost $1000 more then the HM150 in Europe. And another $800 to get it patched to do all framerates. :/
On top of this I'm sensing that JVC might be about to release a HM150 replacement soon.