Chris Harding
February 11th, 2013, 01:02 AM
Hi Guys
OK , today is just as hot as Saturday but it is a little cloudy and I did a few test shots with ND filters..Now these are "supposedly" top of the range (3 filters cost me $120) so they are no $2.99 eBay cheapies.
I did 3 clips with No ND filter, then an ND4 and then an ND8 .... the footage gets progressively "redder" as you go up and especially with a scene with greenery the green content just starts to disappear.
Judge for yourself with the pics below....the BIG question is : Do you have to go to manual WB every time you use an ND filter ...pretty much the answer would be yes...now based on the fact that the WB gets "redder" as you increase the ND ..what now would happen with a variable ND??? The way I see it is every time you dial a new setting on a variable ND it seems you would also have to re-balance colour which is a pain in the butt surely!!
I'd be interested to know if a variable ND would be any different??
Chris
OK , today is just as hot as Saturday but it is a little cloudy and I did a few test shots with ND filters..Now these are "supposedly" top of the range (3 filters cost me $120) so they are no $2.99 eBay cheapies.
I did 3 clips with No ND filter, then an ND4 and then an ND8 .... the footage gets progressively "redder" as you go up and especially with a scene with greenery the green content just starts to disappear.
Judge for yourself with the pics below....the BIG question is : Do you have to go to manual WB every time you use an ND filter ...pretty much the answer would be yes...now based on the fact that the WB gets "redder" as you increase the ND ..what now would happen with a variable ND??? The way I see it is every time you dial a new setting on a variable ND it seems you would also have to re-balance colour which is a pain in the butt surely!!
I'd be interested to know if a variable ND would be any different??
Chris