Ray Turcotte
April 19th, 2012, 01:46 PM
Like everyone else, I'm trying to save time when editing and encoding projects. In that in mind I came across these two articles that are slightly dated yet very informative.
AnandTech - The Sandy Bridge Review: Intel Core i7-2600K, i5-2500K and Core i3-2100 Tested (http://www.anandtech.com/show/4083/the-sandy-bridge-review-intel-core-i7-2600k-i5-2500k-core-i3-2100-tested/9)
and
Intel Quick Sync Hardware Encoding | Brian C. Becker (http://www.briancbecker.com/blog/2011/intel-quick-sync-hardware-encoding/)
After googling, and reading up on it, it seems to me that Intel is targeting the low end APU market with the quick sync hardware engine.
Also, it seems to me in the pro NLE space, the quick sync hardware acceleration can have benefits particularly with h.264 encoding, and particularly with NLEs that are written to be multithreaded.
So, has anyone heard anything more about it? Will any of the big NLEs take advantage of it?
I'm curious about where quick sync hardware acceleration is going and finding out which editors & encoders will have ports to it.
Thanks
AnandTech - The Sandy Bridge Review: Intel Core i7-2600K, i5-2500K and Core i3-2100 Tested (http://www.anandtech.com/show/4083/the-sandy-bridge-review-intel-core-i7-2600k-i5-2500k-core-i3-2100-tested/9)
and
Intel Quick Sync Hardware Encoding | Brian C. Becker (http://www.briancbecker.com/blog/2011/intel-quick-sync-hardware-encoding/)
After googling, and reading up on it, it seems to me that Intel is targeting the low end APU market with the quick sync hardware engine.
Also, it seems to me in the pro NLE space, the quick sync hardware acceleration can have benefits particularly with h.264 encoding, and particularly with NLEs that are written to be multithreaded.
So, has anyone heard anything more about it? Will any of the big NLEs take advantage of it?
I'm curious about where quick sync hardware acceleration is going and finding out which editors & encoders will have ports to it.
Thanks