Steve Hontz
March 31st, 2012, 12:01 PM
I have a Canon XF 105 & 305. My workflow is to just stick the CF cards in my computer and copy the entire Contents directory to my hard drive. Using the Set Virtual Media function in the CF utility, I can quickly view the clips and look at the camera meta data.
When I want to edit in Sony Vegas, I just use the Windows Explorer search function to search the Contents directory for MXF files. This gives me the list of the files, regardless of the subdirectories, in the proper order, and I can just drag the entire list in one move right into the timeline in Vegas.
Someone on the Vegas forum said I should never do it this way - that I should connect the camera to the computer and download the files that way, as it will properly assemble the pieces together. They said by copying the MXF files the way I am, I may get pieces that don't line up properly at the boundaries (especially since the camera is breaking single clips into 2GB chunks.)
Quote: "If you don't concatenate first then you run the risk of introducing glitches at the chunk boundaries. A second or subsequent chunk does not start at an I-frame necessarily, so the preceding frames could be garbled"
That has not been my experience; all the chunks on the timeline have always butted up against each other properly, and I haven't noticed any issues. Does the camera do something to insure that each chunk begins and ends properly?
When I want to edit in Sony Vegas, I just use the Windows Explorer search function to search the Contents directory for MXF files. This gives me the list of the files, regardless of the subdirectories, in the proper order, and I can just drag the entire list in one move right into the timeline in Vegas.
Someone on the Vegas forum said I should never do it this way - that I should connect the camera to the computer and download the files that way, as it will properly assemble the pieces together. They said by copying the MXF files the way I am, I may get pieces that don't line up properly at the boundaries (especially since the camera is breaking single clips into 2GB chunks.)
Quote: "If you don't concatenate first then you run the risk of introducing glitches at the chunk boundaries. A second or subsequent chunk does not start at an I-frame necessarily, so the preceding frames could be garbled"
That has not been my experience; all the chunks on the timeline have always butted up against each other properly, and I haven't noticed any issues. Does the camera do something to insure that each chunk begins and ends properly?