Jeff Troiano
January 17th, 2012, 09:34 AM
Hey all, I want to get a 70-200 zoom, and was curious if anyone has had experience with either the sigma (about $1400) or the Tamron (about $700)?
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG APO OS HSM for Nikon 589306 B&H Photo
Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD (IF) Macro AF Lens AF001NII-700 B&H
I'd like the Nikon, which is over $2k, but don't know how often I'd be using it. My main filming is Narative, with some music videos mixed in. Since I don't own lens, and am buying all new, I'm getting Nikon mounts. I'm already getting the Nikon 17-55, And Tonkina 11-16. As I said before, I'd like to add a 70-200 to my zooms. The rest will be Ziess primes. Is it worth skimping on the 70-200? Any thoughts?
Keith Forman
January 17th, 2012, 10:12 AM
Will you get the optical stabilization without an electronic connection to the FS100?
Jeff Troiano
January 17th, 2012, 10:33 AM
Really I'm just worried about best possible picture. Everything I've read (mostly reviews from still photo sites), says the Nikon, hands down is the winner in this department.
I wasn't aware there was a smart adapter for the Nikon lens. I have planned to use all my lens in manual. I haven't given thought to image stabilization, because I didn't figure it would apply when used with the fs100.
Nate Haustein
January 17th, 2012, 10:44 AM
I've used both the Tamron and the Sigma (non-OS version).
I think the Tamron is Sharper, but I liked the build quality and "feel" of the Sigma better so it's the one I bought. In video, the difference in sharpness is in my opinion, negligible.
I don't use it a lot, but it's nice to have when you need it for telephoto stuff. However, I usually rent a Canon 70-200mm F2.8 IS long lens when I need it though...
Stu Siegal
January 17th, 2012, 11:06 AM
Thanks Nate. I've been looking at both of these. One of the other costs to consider in adding a lens this size to your kit is a base plate with rods and a lens support, if you don't already have them.
Lee Mullen
January 22nd, 2012, 12:15 AM
What are you guys using to attach EOS lenses to the FS?
Kevin Dooley
January 22nd, 2012, 08:16 PM
I'd really like something like the Canon 70-200f4 - I think it's a good balance of image quality and reach with a decent enough speed for outdoor work (which is when I typically use a lens this long), without being crazy heavy. Problem is everything else I own is Nikon mount with a novoflex mount, which I really like... I don't really want to fool with a "smart adapter" - I just wish there was a novoflex-type mount (or that a mount like that would even work) for Canon lenses.